Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 1, 2022 Author Share Posted October 1, 2022 I'll let Donald Trump Jr. speak for himself here. Quote Is there a consensus on what pronouns to use for World War III if our idiot politicians decide it’s brilliant to get further involved in a regional conflict between two corrupt nations one of whom has the worlds largest nuclear Arsenal? Because that’s what really matters. He's got quite a tongue on him, doesn't he? If you include the sarcasm, he summed up all the fundamentals in that short phrase. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 2, 2022 Author Share Posted October 2, 2022 Here is something a little different on the question of who sabotaged the pipeline. Two opposites analyses from highly intelligent people, both of whom are no friends of Russia. Darren Beatie of Revolver believes the US did the sabotage and that this hurt Russia. World War III Anyone? Nord Stream Pipeline Sabotage Is One Giant Leap Toward Armageddon World War III Anyone? Nord Stream Pipeline Sabotage Is One Giant Leap Toward Armageddon - Revolver News WWW.REVOLVER.NEWS The West is being guided by extremists who seek Russia's destruction, not for geostrategic reasons but for ideological ones. Rebekah Koffler, author of of "Putin’s Playbook: Russia’s Secret Plan to Defeat America," believes Russia did did the sabotage. Five reasons why Russia is likely behind the Nord Stream industrial sabotage Five reasons why Russia is likely behind the Nord Stream industrial sabotage WWW.FOXNEWS.COM The apparent sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline has experts pointing to Moscow as the culprit. Rebekah Koffler, author of "Putin's Playbook," is one such expert. That two people this intelligent, and of stellar integrity, can disagree this frontally shows just how vague fog of war communications makes things. Read both articles and come to your own conclusions. One thing is for certain. You will come away far, far, far better informed than 99.99% of the people on media everywhere right now. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmj Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 I’m sixty-forty Putin did it . He only gains in the short term , didn’t lose any immediate revenue and I’d suspect the damage to the pipeline isn’t catastrophic to eventual full use. I’d go 90/20(fog of war) if in fact it is documented that the damage is ‘strategically’ repairable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 This military 'campaign' so far has been a tightly limited effort with limited aims, using limited methods to avoid destroying civilian infrastructure, several analysts who understand full-scale warfare agree. Premised falsely upon Putin wanting to escalate the war, his brutal intentions, imperialism, apparent nuke threats, etc., towards Europe and the West - that he would blow his own pipeline may seem a strong possibility. Bizarre, out of touch with the observable reality and events. A product of western scholars and journalistic cover-up, blindly accepted because of Russians' caricatured inherent 'evil', deviousness and cunning. And so a false flag attack which gains Russia nothing. Not even a publicity advantage. "Look how Russian property is being attacked by evil Western forces!" So what - Who cares? It's the West that's running short of options and needs to a). keep upping the ante or b). fold - and accept the negotiations they've stupidly and immorally rejected from Day one- i.e. 'admit defeat' after its massive investment, material and moral, in Ukraine. It is the losing side that always needs to "double-down" to get out of trouble and recoup losses, and no matter what one hears in the lying media Ukraine is steadily losing. Obversely, things are moving along quite satisfactorily for Russian objectives, with minor counter-attacks to contend with, most of the held territory is under control--Russia is staying. Certainly, in response to advanced arming and NATO close-support, Putin has needed to increase his out-numbered initial forces, the fresh intake required mostly for defense now. Putin made very clear what he wanted, security guarantees and liberation for the Russian Ukrainians. No one was prepared to take him at his word--nor, to closely watch if his actions corresponded. Ultimately, one sees now in retrospect that, from his p.o.v, the "offensive" invasion was SELF-defensive (not always a self-contradiction) - protective of both Russia and the Russo-Ukrainian separatists. The insane, wider "imperialist" notion is being laid to rest by evidence. (Is it expected by fear mongers that Putin will shortly conduct referendums in western Ukraine and Kyiv, to also become part of Russia? Before, that is, he invades and conquers e.g. Poland? heh). The NATO alliance was losing its economic-political grip on popular support in Germany. Their huge industry is crashing and winter is close. But after Putin openly told Schultz recently he would resupply them with gas, at any time he wanted - "just a push on the button", there clearly was western alarm that they might independently arrange that, and so lose a critical EU partner to "the other side". That had to be stopped, pre-empted to remove Putin's energy-supply edge over Europe. But the rewriting of the facts/motives to cause ambivalence and perhaps shift the public's blame and attention from the obvious culprits who alone benefit, was predictable. Like every step in this war, the embedded 'narrative' is too powerful to oppose. The West's single battle that's been won from the start is the propaganda war. Put it this way, if done by a third party, the sabotage wasn't carried out without the Americans/British pre-knowledge and approval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 3, 2022 Share Posted October 3, 2022 US and UK Sabotaged Ukrainian Peace Deal – scheerpost.com SCHEERPOST.COM The West's aim "is not the victory of Ukraine, It's the defeat of Russia," Baud says. "The problem is that nobody cares about Ukraine. We have... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 3, 2022 Share Posted October 3, 2022 Article by Vladimir Putin “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” Published July 12 2021 Text from Russia's Presidential website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 3, 2022 Share Posted October 3, 2022 "Kinda makes you feel more alive, don't it?" Nuclear weapons convoy sparks fears Putin could be preparing test to send ‘signal to the West’ Train operated by secretive nuclear division spotted in central Russia heading towards the front line in Ukraine Nuclear weapons convoy sparks fears Putin could be preparing test to send ‘signal to the West’ WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Train operated by secretive nuclear division spotted in central Russia heading towards the front line in Ukraine 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 How the media operates: Various leaders and interviewees voice rhetorical insinuations about Russia possessing and possibly using nukes, adding "well - we have them too! So watch out! Putin responds to the reports by stating Russia's "No First Use" policy. Only in the case of ... etc., etc. The front page of New York Times next day exclaims: "Putin boasts about using his nuclear weapons!" --and every paper and network worldwide echo with the news. [Therefore anything which occurs on or near the battlefield will not be questioned - Putin's doing.] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 5, 2022 Author Share Posted October 5, 2022 Surprise, surprise, surprise... Here's a comment by a person who believes the US should send money to Ukraine. He goes there to help. But he doesn't see any money going there. US Veteran Working on the Ground in Ukraine: There Is NO EVIDENCE of the Billions in US Dollars Sent to Ukraine – Not Seeing Any Relief (AUDIO) US Veteran Working on the Ground in Ukraine: There Is NO EVIDENCE of the Billions in US Dollars Sent to Ukraine - Not Seeing Any Relief (AUDIO) WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM In August a US team of veterans led by Chad Robichaux announced they had rescued 17,000 US Legal Permanent Residents from Afghanistan After Joe Biden pulled out of the country a year earlier in... Quote Chad Robichaaux, the founder end CEO of Mighty Oaks Foundation, was recently on the ground in Ukraine. Chad told Glenn Beck that he saw NO evidence of the billions of dollars in aide the US taxpayers sent over to the country. You can hear him on this video. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 The 2019 Rand Corporation report. "Over-extending and Unbalancing Russia" It's deja vu like the conferences on Covid 19 before Covid 19. An analysis and critique: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjzr_T348n6AhVaOMAKHfOdA90QFnoECBYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fenglish.almayadeen.net%2Farticles%2Fblog%2Frand-report-prescribed-us-provocations-against-russia-predic&usg=AOvVaw2tpM_ooYac6e60Vrc-PrMt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 Anyone check the Defcon level, lately? HHS purchases drug for use in radiological and nuclear emergencies HHS purchases drug for use in radiological and nuclear emergencies ASPR.HHS.GOV "As part of long-standing, ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is purchasing a supply of the drug Nplate from Amgen USA Inc; Nplate is approved to treat blood cell injuries that accompany acute radiation syndrome in adult and pediatric patients (ARS). "Amgen, based in Thousands Oaks, California, developed Nplate for ARS with support from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), as well as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 23 hours ago, ThatGuy said: Anyone check the Defcon level, lately? HHS purchases drug for use in radiological and nuclear emergencies HHS purchases drug for use in radiological and nuclear emergencies ASPR.HHS.GOV "As part of long-standing, ongoing efforts to be better prepared to save lives following radiological and nuclear emergencies, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is purchasing a supply of the drug Nplate from Amgen USA Inc; Nplate is approved to treat blood cell injuries that accompany acute radiation syndrome in adult and pediatric patients (ARS). "Amgen, based in Thousands Oaks, California, developed Nplate for ARS with support from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the HHS Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), as well as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health. " Incidentally, we're currently at Defcon 3... Current Defcon Level Today | 2022 Warning System Condition WWW.DEFCONLEVEL.COM Current defcon level today. 2022 warning system condition and alert status meaning. DEFCON 3, Round House Or Yellow Alert Level WWW.DEFCONLEVEL.COM Defcon 3, - round house or yellow alert status level. "DEFCON 3, or Round House is an increase in alertness and military readiness, also known as 'yellow alert' status. With Defcon 3 the air force is in a higher state or level of readiness so that they can deploy and mobilize within 15 minutes time. Taken from Defcon Level Warning System: https://www.defconlevel.com/levels/defcon-3.php "The alert color for DEFCON 3, or Round House is yellow. The meaning behind this condition level is similar to that of a yellow "caution" sign. We are prepared, cautious and in a state of military readiness. This condition represents a state of preparedness and a high level of caution. "The alert status may be raised to Defcon 3, or Round House after a precision strike is carried out by an an enemy. This condition may also be reached after a precision strike is carried out by the United States military or any event that warrants a cautious state of military readiness and alert by U.S forces. Taken from Defcon Level Warning System: https://www.defconlevel.com/levels/defcon-3.php" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 MORE - Putin "not joking" about tactical nuclear weapons, Biden added. NEW - Ukraine's Zelensky calls on NATO to launch "preemptive strikes" against Russia to "eliminate the possibility" of a Russian nuclear strike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 7, 2022 Author Share Posted October 7, 2022 Raheem has it right. Quote Why is no one stating the obvious? Zelensky has regime-ending dirt on Biden and other Western leaders who have used Ukraine as their corruption playground for decades. That’s why they projected that onto Trump during Impeachment #1. He’s blackmailing us into nuclear war. What's more. I might be wrong, but I think--if the money keeps rolling into Ukraine--we will see one reason after another to postpone nukes. When it looks like it is going to drastically lessen or stop, the nuke stuff will heat up again. Zelensky has Biden and others over a barrel and he is squeezing their nuts. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 This is what's called "prepping" the public - and not only by the psycho TV performer, Z. Did a Brig.Gen. actually just say that? ... and on a nuclear power plant!! Off the scale panic from western powers, accepted calmly by a CNN flunky. about 5min. in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 20 minutes ago, anthony said: This is what's called "prepping" the public - and not only by the psycho TV performer, Z. Did a Brig.Gen. actually just say that? ... and on a nuclear power plant!! Off the scale panic from western powers, accepted calmly by a CNN flunky. about 5min. in. Don't forget how a nuclear war might be good to in the war against climate change...(but you didn't think about that, did you? No; you only think about yourself...;) ) Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming WWW.HUFFPOST.COM Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 7, 2022 Author Share Posted October 7, 2022 LOL... This is not supposed to be funny, but this is all we've got. As I said, I might be wrong, but I believe this is the bulk of what it's all about. Michael 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 12 hours ago, ThatGuy said: Don't forget how a nuclear war might be good to in the war against climate change...(but you didn't think about that, did you? No; you only think about yourself...;) ) Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming WWW.HUFFPOST.COM Nuclear War Could Reverse Global Warming "The cons seem to outweigh the pros in the event of global cooling caused by even a small nuclear war." Yay for that! Maybe, a nuke war won't be such a good idea... On balance - but maybe a very "small" one could work...? All part of the "normalizing" about nuclear exchanges suddenly prattled about. Get used to ¬some¬ of the human race being extinguished, too many of them anyway. To even consider the horrendous notion shows scientists have lost a rational epistemology. (Rand: The physical sciences are still ruled by some remnants of a rational epistemology (which is rapidly being destroyed)..." She should have seen the Covid 'scientists'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatGuy Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 9 minutes ago, anthony said: "The cons seem to outweigh the pros in the event of global cooling caused by even a small nuclear war." Yay for that! Maybe, a nuke war won't be such a good idea... On balance - but maybe a very "small" one could work...? All part of the "normalizing" about nuclear exchanges suddenly prattled about. To even consider the horrendous notion shows scientists have lost a rational epistemology. (Rand: The physical sciences are still ruled by some remnants of a rational epistemology (which is rapidly being destroyed)..." She should have seen the Covid 'scientists'. "Why are liberals so eager to wage nuclear war? Half of them can’t figure out what bathroom to use." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 Yes, on that Twitter page, Pharma also are quick to cash in: "US buys $290 million worth of of drugs in preparation for nuclear emergencies" A vaccine against radiation poisoning coming next? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 Why are liberals so eager...? That's an interesting one. I'm considering perhaps they, some, many, have such pathological narcissism/subjectivity that they can't conceive of their own dying by nuke-- other people (peasants) will be killed, but not me. We the elite class are too supremely special for that. Like a secularist form of a chosen by God complex. Something in that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 Backing up James Woods' query, a sober assessment of Biden's nuclear weapon rhetoric at Moon of Alabama. For me, Putin was never the primary culprit for creating "a false flag event". MoA - Biden's Fearmongers About A Russian Nuclear Threat That No One Has Made WWW.MOONOFALABAMA.ORG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now