anthony

Members
  • Posts

    7,733
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

anthony last won the day on February 14

anthony had the most liked content!

About anthony

Profile Information

  • Location
    Republic of South Africa
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Full Name
    AJG
  • Looking or Not Looking
    not looking
  • Description
    My all-time quote: "Man is a being of self-made soul."

Recent Profile Visitors

21,448 profile views

anthony's Achievements

Experienced

Experienced (11/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

448

Reputation

  1. Without meaning, yup. I don't know why it wasn't plain, ( it was, but why stop a war to weaken/regime-change Russia, with Ukraine doing the heavy work?) - that Putin was trying to force Kyiv into negotiations from the start--and that almost worked, until Boris and Biden talked Zel out of it. He wanted to conquer all Ukraine, then to invade Europe, the experts said: all scaremongering b.s. to get the European backing. Hardly-reported was the Istanbul meeting in which Zel was already agreeing to neutrality terms with the Russians. Putin - the only "imperialist" in history with a tiny outnumbered army (to begin with) who sought negotiations only one month into the campaign. Somebody has to say it: RFKjr Volker nonsensically delivers the narrative, Ukraine's innocence and Putin's 'Empire building'.
  2. A very good discussion, I'm only glad some can see the perils ahead by mobilizing more troops over there. It seemed to me that NATO could never and would never back down-- too much prestige and credibility at stake. The time to de-escalate and take the negotiation 'off-ramp' was early in 2022 with minimum losses, minimal concessions to Russia and NATO's reputation intact. But - somehow- they believed their own fantasy, Russia would be beaten (military, economy, Putin's overthrow). All fine and upbeat until the reality of the war set in. Once in, Russia wasn't going away. And they fed the major lie to Europeans: Putin intended to invade beyond Ukraine. Ukraine was dragged down for that, "defending Europe". Now my fears of the possibility of false flag attacks to justify a huge operation gets closer.
  3. Left Woke and Palestine explained by James Lindsay
  4. The Truth About the Hostages and the Israel-Hamas ‘Ceasefire’—Colonel Richard Kemp | ATL:NOW WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM Colonel Richard Kemp is a former British army commander and the author of 'Attack State Red; A Landmark Tour of Duty in Afghanistan.'
  5. Sorry, at the start of BK 's discussion, "You will own nothing and be happy" came to mind. Effortless happiness... No free will - and that's great! Ha, confirms what 'a relief', I suggested I seem to repeatedly see the identical strawman such thinkers raise; Whatever they take it to mean, volition is NOT *a guarantee* of life success, happiness, certainty and so on, but is THE essential prerequisite for them. AND it is not any single "choice", but a series of many. I will watch more. I had to turn for relief to Branden and bits from a passage in HTS: "Free will - in the widest meaning of the term - is the doctrine that human beings are capable of performing actions that are not determined by forces outside their control, that we are capable of making choices that are not necessitated by antecedent factors.... "Freedom does not mean causelessness, this point must be stressed. It is caused by the person who makes the choice, and the choice entails a enormity of issues... {lists several requisites] "While focusing is not synonymous with reasoning, we can see how central the role of reason and rationality is... "Our freedom is neither absolute nor unlimited, however..." [Due to factors including the developmental, genetic and biological] You can see where Branden's heading, free will being one column for his subject, self-esteem. (Was xyz my successful doing (self-earned) or was it 'predetermined' - out of my control?) One more casualty of determinism, the definite cause of the widespread low self-esteem by people, definitely of increasing anti-individualism.
  6. Afaic, the "scientific denial of free will" is the basic cause of everything wrong, bad and evil today. You don't have volition, the men of science have 'proven' - which has seeped into the mainstream (education, media - etc.), what A RELIEF: you won't ever need to take yourself to task, nor be faulted for your bad actions. To a greater degree, your actions, knowledge, character qualities/faults, etc., were ~determined~ for you in your distant or near past by prior causes. Secular leftists for one are most taken with the theory: She couldn't help herself! One's evasion of reality now is at worst a minor mistake, moral judgments of anyone are superfluous or unjust. For the Christian religious - they believed at least that each has and is responsible for their own "Soul", religious or not (and ykw is going to judge it one day). But ever since Western religions began declining - disappearing with them are the last remnants of western free will and self-responsibilty (plus individualism). If I recall those sophomoric experiments, they showed nothing more than that a specific area of a person's brain 'lights up' an instant before he selects and presses a button (or suchlike). His brain told him - "determined" what choice to make? Or the choice made registered on his brain? Causation is key. Self-refuting or inconclusive scientism. The same tests were demonstrated continually on the internet, claiming to nullify free will. The audience responses were all very highly positive giving one a clue of the effects of this belief on the great numbers in societies. The ease with which people are being indoctrinated and propagandized, and submit to authority - indicates that loss. Once volition is eliminated, consistently there also goes the volitional consciousness. Sam Harris was one who stated free will -and- the mind do not exist. Whatever his rationale, he got it right, as far as it goes - you take out the one logically you remove the other. The content of consciousness is all-reliant on the volitional, deliberated efforts that compose and organize a huge input into the mind. These destructive neurologists (and the rest) were not able to locate "the mind" in the most sophisticated MRI scans. They looked for consciousness in biological matter, and unsurprisingly it wasn't there. The culpability for the damage done to masses of mindless minds today must be directed at them.
  7. Most complete of all, "a being of volitional consciousness" denotes one's mind identity, a "will" free to roam, to defocus/focus the mind. I'm suggesting by its nature one self-directs a v.c. in a range - integrated - of levels. "Choices" all the way down to the subsequent actions. "Could have been otherwise" - absolutely.
  8. For fun, I'd call it "three in one" free will in a continuum. The sense-percept apparatus, while automatic to every animal, may still be directed from this to that. LOOK here, listen there, touch/taste here. Right off the bat, one has selective options for attention from a large range. Where it gets most complex, (refer to Rand here) the non-automatic conceptual apparatus needs your highest volitional effort to gather and collate, compare, assimilate - then evaluate - the percepts into orderly form. Last, what does one DO? With one's knowledge/value/character base? When to apply this conception in what situation - then act? And in which way? Again free will. This final "action" stage is where many contra-free will thinkers get tied up and narrow, far as I've read. As though they lose the plot focusing on evident human mechanical activity and look for its pre-determining antecedent causes. In the physical world. And in the brain. Overlooking the good ole self-made (emergent) mind. Naturally, they are also mechanistic.
  9. He employed free will to conclude he/nobody has free will. Bravo.
  10. Son of Hamas RUMBLE.COM This “son of Hamas” will knock your socks off. He doesn’t pull punches and even criticizes his own parents. He doesn’t mince words. There is nothing politically correct about what he says. It is just
  11. Marc, Good find, I was about to link it. Humble apologies forthcoming from BBC's anchors and 'analysts' jumping to conclusions, perhaps? The automatic and prejudiced presumption Israelis dunnit - and they are lying - isn't new to us. It's certain moral cowardice to faithfully accept the word of a (once again recently) proven terrorist gang. (Cynic that I am, I did first consider this deliberate, not by Israel as the "projected" narrative was manipulated - by Hamas. What are the odds of a misfired rocket hitting a hospital? We'll see more. I put no act beyond Hamas. Do the media believe appeasing them will keep future terrorist operations out of their countries?
  12. Ralph is one of the survivors of Kfar Aza the closest kibbutz to Gaza. A schoolmate and long friend of my wife's since before he moved to Israel from SA. He tells a little of his story to an AUS TV
  13. Elon Musk Drops Vaccine Bombshell Personal Story | Facts Matter LISTS.YOUMAKER.COM Musk took to X to challenge the EU's most recent law regarding disinformation, and called out its hypocritical push for censorship.