Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, william.scherk said:

If guilty, sentencing would happen some time between now and the mid-term

Steve Bannon found guilty on both contempt counts. Sentencing scheduled for October.

bannonContemptexcerptNBC~2.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting Bannon in jail right before the Midterms.

Hmmmmmm

Wonder how that will play out with the Dems lack of a ground game.

Mandela did 27 years and became Prime Minister.

If Bannon does even 27 days, it may be even a worse slaughter than is going to happen regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appeals court.

Overturn.

All the rest is fodder for the media.

And, for the people pulling the strings backstage, that's all it's meant to be.

Bannon will milk the hell out of this, though. Talk about a friggin' boomerang on the idiots who want to make a cautionary spectacle out of him. Watch what happens.

And watch what happens to Liz Cheney...

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an example of the Deep State unraveling big-time.

2 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Here's a tantalizing story from Axios on Trump's second term plans. 

"Purging" and "purge" will likely be featured widely in knock-on reporting.

 

2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

William,

I certainly hope so...

:)

Michael

Let's see how this is resonating with at least one milk-toast pundit (but one who I like :) ) :

TRUMP PLANS TO FIRE UP TO 50,000 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AFTER WINNING IN 2024, HE GOT MY VOTE!

dRZ3NJobkeU_640x360.jpg
WWW.BITCHUTE.COM

Trump Plans To FIRE Up To 50,000 Government Employees After Winning In 2024, He Got My Vote! A Trump Administration would bring on Kash Patel, Peter Navarro and other former officials to clear out the...

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, this witch hunt of former officials of the Trump administration is great news for the upcoming MAGA administration.

If it did not happen, when it's time to put the bums in prison, the job would be a hard sell to the public. 

A much easier sell is, "They set the precedent. If they can do it, we can do it."

I don't like that reasoning if the precedent is irrational, but as persuasion fodder, it's the good stuff. Rationality is no object.

 

I know the establishment elitists (RINOs, establishment Dems, Deep State, etc.) are in a panic and throwing Hail Mary passes for as long as there is still time on the clock, but I honestly can't believe how stupid they are with this one. Maybe it's this. Getting away with the election steal of 2020 (at least for now) has made them lower their guard.

But jeez... Lower it to this extent?

Even a caveman can see what will happen...

:)

 

Well, maybe they actually are that stupid. When they removed the filibuster to approve Kagan as Supreme Court Justice (a Hail Mary pass if ever there was one), little did they realize that they were making it easy-peasy to overturn Roe v Wade. Them's the breaks for the stupid. :) 

The Deep State is not just unraveling, they are burning down their own house of power in panic and impatience. :) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Appeals court.

Overturn.

All the rest is fodder for the media.

And, for the people pulling the strings backstage, that's all it's meant to be.

Bannon will milk the hell out of this, though.

Steve got back in the saddle at the War Room.

He openly said the trial and verdict were noise, not signal.

The signal is the massive win coming in November.

Steve not only lacks any worry lines or anxious looks about the verdict, he's as happy as a puppy dog in a swimming pool. Especially because of that Axios article above--which, incidentally, I read and recommend.

See for yourself.

TRS7e.qR4e-small-Episode-2023-Axios-Bloc
RUMBLE.COM

Episode 2023: Axios Blockbuster: Trumps 2024 Plan; Economic Indicators Implode

:)

Michael

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve did his own show first (see the previous post), but Tucker got the first interview after the conviction.

Do ya' think an interview like that is causing heartburn all throughout the globalist ruling class?

I don't mean the true believers. I mean the puppet-masters.

Imagine what their next few days are going to be like since they will not be sleeping well.

:)

I know some of them are trying to figure out how to assassinate Steve Bannon and not get caught...

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more drip drip drip...

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Admin Policy Narrowing Detainment, Deportation of Illegal Aliens

biden-in-jeddah.jpg
WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM

The U.S. Supreme Court gave Texas and Louisiana a temporary legal victory in the border states’ attempt to ...

 

Quote

The U.S. Supreme Court gave Texas and Louisiana a temporary legal victory in the border states’ attempt to strike down a September 2021 Biden administration immigration guideline.

The Supreme Court, in a ruling without explanation on Thursday, allowed a federal judge in Texas to block the Biden Administration’s immigration guideline that, according to the border states’ prosecutors, limits the ability of border agents to detain and deport illegal aliens.

The ruling is a political setback for the Biden administration as it tries to juggle an unprecedented surge in illegal immigration, overburdened Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and an agenda to replace the Trump administration’s more stringent border policy amid bipartisan criticism.

Dissenting justices include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Elena Kagan, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson—marking Jackson’s first vote since the start of her tenure last month.

So now what is the ruling class going to do with all those illegal aliens trying to get into the USA?

They are going to watch border agents send back across the border, that's what. At least for now.

The border agents are still going to have a hard time of it, but at least they can send the illegals back when they catch them rather than ship them to different places in the US.

I find it curious that Amy Coney Barrett voted with the left on this...

I know she takes her job super-seriously. I enjoyed the times I have seen her talk.

But, politically, when a decision is more political than judicial, I have a feeling that she has the soul of a RINO, not a soul of the people.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Steve did his own show first (see the previous post), but Tucker got the first interview after the conviction.

Do ya' think an interview like that is causing heartburn all throughout the globalist ruling class?

I don't mean the true believers. I mean the puppet-masters.

Imagine what their next few days are going to be like since they will not be sleeping well.

:)

I know some of them are trying to figure out how to assassinate Steve Bannon and not get caught...

Michael

Wow! Brilliant interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

One more drip drip drip...

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Admin Policy Narrowing Detainment, Deportation of Illegal Aliens

biden-in-jeddah.jpg
WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM

The U.S. Supreme Court gave Texas and Louisiana a temporary legal victory in the border states’ attempt to ...

 

So now what is the ruling class going to do with all those illegal aliens trying to get into the USA?

They are going to watch border agents send back across the border, that's what. At least for now.

The border agents are still going to have a hard time of it, but at least they can send the illegals back when they catch them rather than ship them to different places in the US.

I find it curious that Amy Coney Barrett voted with the left on this...

I know she takes her job super-seriously. I enjoyed the times I have seen her talk.

But, politically, when a decision is more political than judicial, I have a feeling that she has the soul of a RINO, not a soul of the people.

Michael

I've never bought the idea that generally Dems want to let in people who will vote progressive or socialist, nor that Republicans want to keep progressives (or people of color) out...

From a voting perspective, the spigots are controlling a flow IMHO vastly filled with people who reject banana republics, socialism, authoritarianism, and are hoping, just hoping America is (or will be at any rate) different from and freer than the rest of the crumbling west.  I mean the risks they take, the distances they travel, giving up everything of their previous life...IMHO Most of those people clamouring to enter believe in equality of opportunity and capitalism and want that opportunity to live free and build a life for themselves. 

 

But that flow does, of course, include other kinds of opportunists, those of an unsavory nature, which when the border is unfiltered can slip into the country much easier.  So, are they criminal leaders setting up local criminal networks or just dumb petty lone criminals contributing to chaos?  Are political agitators slipping through or is any amount of added anarchy and chaos contributing to a state of crisis what we should be paying attention to?  Would foreign agitators and agents slipping through? 

IS that why Republicans are called to action to tighten the borders up?  Is that why Dems want looser borders... create crises and chaos,to bring it all crumbling down, to rebuild and reset everything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strictlylogical said:

I've never bought the idea that generally Dems want to let in people who will vote progressive or socialist, nor that Republicans want to keep progressives (or people of color) out...

 

1 hour ago, Strictlylogical said:

IS that why Republicans are called to action to tighten the borders up?  Is that why Dems want looser borders... create crises and chaos,to bring it all crumbling down, to rebuild and reset everything?


A clue lies in the reaction to politicians in D.C. and N.Y. , "sanctuary cities", freaking out over Texas's bussing the illegals getting in over to them, instead...
 

GettyImages-1241849400.jpg?quality=85&st
WWW.NBCNEWYORK.COM

New York City Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday demanded the federal government help pay for what he said was a wave of asylum seekers...

 

DC-Mayor-Muriel-Browser.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
WWW.FOXNEWS.COM

Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser claimed on "Face the Nation" that asylum seekers are tricked into being bused into her city as...

 

  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Election Integrity, everyone.

CAUGHT: Michigan News Channel Posts Results to Republican Primary Election — That’s Not Until Next Week!!

0BE27C38-6C4B-4083-8EB8-79D9150CC244.jpe
WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

So this happened… Michigan News Channel 3 published the results to the Republican primary election. RINO Tudor Dixon won!! AND … Trump hater Peter Meijer won his race too!! There’s just one thing… The...

Any comment needed about these GOP RINO clowns in Michigan?

:) 

Michael

  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beavis: What happened to Biden, Butthead?

Butthead: President Biden failed in so many ways. And the democrats know he can’t beat Trump in 2024.

Beavis: What about Kamala taking over?

Butthead: She's not going to happen, and she has very low approval ratings. Harris used to be more middle of the road but now she is playing up to the radical left and that never works.

Beavis: Will Trump run?

Butthead: I think so. And only one person is almost assured of getting the democratic nomination. California Governor Gavin Newsom is going to run for President in 2024 and he will be hard to beat. His running mate could be Michelle Obama or Hillary. As of now, I would bet on Michelle Obama. Peter

Notes: Newsom Hardest Democrat to Beat in 2024 Presidential Race: TPUSA Straw Poll BY XANDER LANDEN ON 7/24/22 AT 4:56 PM EDT. Attendees at this weekend's conservative Turning Point USA (TPUSA) Student Action Summit believe that California Governor Gavin Newsom would be the hardest Democratic candidate for a Republican to beat in a hypothetical 2024 presidential race, according to a new straw poll.

Just over 30 percent of attendees said Newsom would be the most formidable Democratic candidate while Michelle Obama came in second place with 13.6 percent, according to the poll, the results of which were first reported by Fox News on Sunday. Hillary Clinton ranked third with 10.5 percent of attendees believing she'd be the top Democrat to beat while Senator Bernie Sanders came in fourth at 10.3 percent. Nearly 8 percent of those surveyed selected Vice President Kamala Harris, and only 4.4 percent said that President Joe Biden would be the toughest Democratic opponent for a GOP challenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Styx made a video about the following article from Salon.

He said he's used to seeing Trump Derangement Syndrome, but this one has gone into the stratosphere.

The establishment guys are terrified.

(And he's right about a technical thing. He says to use Archive links so the lefties and establishment media don't get a cent of ad money. So I did. :) )

 

Trump 2024 is almost here: King of the long con looks to play his final trick
The master showman of politics wants another turn on center stage. Mock him if you want — but don't bet against him

donald-trump-0719221.jpg
WWW.SALON.COM

The master showman of politics wants another turn on center stage. Mock him if you want — but don't bet against him


Here are Styx's comments on this article.

pYskcA-3o64_640x360.jpg
WWW.BITCHUTE.COM

https://archive.ph/08RzQ Support via donation: Patreon: https://tinyurl.com/y2jothtp Subscribestar: https://tinyurl.com/yyxov782 My books: Blogger: https://tinyurl.com/y3tww3om Wordpress:...

 

That article really is something to read if you are MAGA, into schadenfreude, and realize it is the stuck pig squealing.

My favorite phrase from the article is when the author talked about Trump's "pattern of stochastic terrorism."

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Styx made a video about the following article from Salon.

He said he's used to seeing Trump Derangement Syndrome, but this one has gone into the stratosphere.

I wanted it for break viewing while cycling to the local brewery and back. I clicked on the CocoCut add-on icon and up popped the result of its 'can we download this?' internal queries. Often, CocoCut will only offer you a "force download" and another bit of a chore.

This time the app offered me a play button, which popped up a plain old HTML5 video player with download option.

As quickly bashed together and posted to Twitter ...

 

  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2022 at 4:48 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

I might be wrong, but I have a feeling the Tina Peters thing is far, far from over.

It is!

It is far from over.

“This Will Bring Down Their Evil Empire!” – HUGE UPDATE: Candidate Tine Peters Raises Funds for Recount in Stolen Colorado Primary Race! — INCREDIBLE ACHIEVEMENT!

bannon-peters.jpg
WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

On Tuesday, June 28, a no-name political operative who sits on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) won the Republican primary...

Yesterday, on the War Room, she needed $250k to be able to demand a recount.

It looks like she got it.

:) 

 

Now, here's the kicker with Tina.

She knows how the voting machines and voting machine systems in Colorado work. That used to be her job.

I wonder how the predator class in Colorado will try to square that circle and neutralize Tina while the whole world is watching in the upcoming recount mess...

:)

Michael

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2022 at 11:51 AM, william.scherk said:

Tina Peters requested a hand recount of her GOP primary loss, but failed to put up funds to pay for it.

"Had" failed to pony up the funds. But as Michael noted elsewhere, today being the deadline for requests-plus-checks, the struggle for integrity moves on. 

Steve Bannon had Tina Peters on for War Room episode #2027 yesterday. Here's an audio cut of her segment. He asked a few non-softball questions, mostly about what evidence she has in hand to convince the as yet unpersuaded (ie, in court). 

Download or play audio [this is an MP4 file, so you will download a video] :

I believe that Tina Peters has some choices ahead for what she wants done in the recount. I predict that if a bi-partisan formal state-wide 're-run' of the Secretary of State race is done to statute and her choices, the results will only be accepted if they fit the so-called Big Lie screenplay treatment. Dark actors, filthy tabulator corruption, fiends to the left and the right.  Mostly on the left. 

Check out the Twitter thread below which lays out plausible steps of the recount. From a self-styled election nerd.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2022 at 8:11 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

That [Salon] article really is something to read if you are MAGA, into schadenfreude, and realize it is the stuck pig squealing.

My favorite phrase from the article is when the author talked about Trump's "pattern of stochastic terrorism."

It's kind of a buzzword, "stochastic terrorism," and it can obscure the process that it seeks to illuminate, in my opinion.**

Styxhexenhammer666 has another Rumble video up. It takes a look at what he calls "the propaganda apparatus of the Deep State Media," and its reporting yesterday on DOJ grand jury testimony.

n-0-e.4Wpjb.jpg
RUMBLE.COM

"People familiar with the matter" is pretty vacuous: https://archive.ph/JBqEZ Support via donation: Patreon: https://tinyurl.com/y2jothtp Subscribestar:...

 

-- from my general reading in and around the DSM story, the "people familiar with the matter," should they exist in reality, seem most likely to be from folks called in to testify.  The prosecution side is forbidden to discuss what happens in the grand jury room.  The witness side is perfectly free to discuss it.  "Can you keep my name out of it?"  "Why, sure, Mr Short's lawyer, for sure."

Styx disagrees with a Wittes-style examination. 

Here's the audio to Styx's "people familiar with the matter" analysis:

Download or play [MP4 video file] :
 

If there is anything to the claims made in the story, chalk it up to the machinations of the remnant Deep State.

Key words: "fake electors" ...

webMetaImg?v=1
GROUND.NEWS

The Justice Department is investigating Donald Trump's actions in its criminal probe of the former president's attempts to overturn his 2020 election defeat. The Justice Department has been interviewing former...

 


** "[T]he public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted: The lone-wolf attack was apparently influenced by the rhetoric of stochastic terrorism."

"While the exact definition has morphed over time, it has commonly come to refer to a concept whereby consistently demonizing or dehumanizing a targeted group or individual results in violence that is statistically likely, but cannot be easily accurately predicted."

Edited by william.scherk
The remnant!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2022 at 2:00 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

This is an example of the Deep State unraveling big-time.

On 7/22/2022 at 11:52 AM, william.scherk said:

Here's a tantalizing story from Axios on Trump's second term plans. 

"Purging" and "purge" will likely be featured widely in knock-on reporting.

 

Don't miss Part 2 of the Axios "sources said" investigation. 

1658419410583.jpg
WWW.AXIOS.COM

Trump planned to weed out anyone disloyal to him, including via the newly crafted "Schedule F."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now