Coronavirus


Peter

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Marc said:

Check out what PM Trudeau said the other day re the non vaxxed.

 

I looked it up.

Quote

“They are extremists who don’t believe in science, they’re often misogynists, also often racists,” said Trudeau. “It’s a small group that muscles in, and we have to make a choice in terms of leaders, in terms of the country. Do we tolerate these people?”

What a psycho. That's the only way to describe the guy at this point. He's a psychopath.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dglgmut said:

I looked it up.

What a psycho. That's the only way to describe the guy at this point. He's a psychopath.

Scum of the earth.  Even having to listen to him talk, I just want to beat him like an ugly redheaded stepchild.  Yeah it’s just a saying….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/21/2021 at 12:08 PM, Ellen Stuttle said:

 

vaccine-shots-vax.jpg
WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

Just got some sad news about my great niece. She was compelled to get the Covid jab in order to stay employed. She was pregnant. Within a week of getting the jab she miscarried. Not a coincidence. The New...


In this article Johnson talks about:


Miscarriage rates:

The New England Journal of Medicine reported in June that if a woman is vaccinated before the fetus passes the 20 week mark of gestation, there is an 80% chance of a miscarriage:

Well, Ellen already linked this article. The menstrual cycle stuff is well known, but I think most people have written it off as harmless. I think the miscarriages and the shifted cycles are probably connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very good question.

Will The Covid Generation Forgive Us For Allowing State-Mandated Child Abuse?

Screen-Shot-2022-01-07-at-12.58.53-AM.jp
WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

Guest post by Tom Malone “There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way it treats its children.” – Nelson Mandela Is that headline too harsh? Given the systematic abuse of children under...

 

Quote

For two years, children have been terrorized with fear, isolated from their friends, denied an education, forced to wear useless and dehumanizing masks, and denied their athletic and artistic pursuits. They were taught to view everyone around them as a deadly bio-hazard and warned that if they didn’t go along with all the rules they might kill Grandma. They were even denied in-person treatment for mental health and social support services.

. . .

In a recent segment on Face The Nation, CBS News reporter Jan Crawford correctly stated that the impact of Covid policies on children was the most under-reported story of the year:

But I mean, even teenagers, you know, a healthy teenager has a one in a million chance of getting, and dying from COVID, which is way lower than, you know, dying in a car wreck on a road trip. But they have suffered and sacrificed the most, especially kids and underrepresented at risk communities.

And now we have the Surgeon General saying there’s a mental health crisis among our kids. The risk of suicide — suicide attempts among girls now up 51% this year, black kids nearly twice as likely as white kids to die by suicide.
I mean, school closures, lockdowns, cancellation of sports. You couldn’t even go on a playground in the D.C. area without cops scurrying . . . shooing the kids off.

A tremendous negative impact on kids, and it’s been an afterthought. You know, it’s hurt their dreams, their future learning loss, risk of abuse, their mental health. And now, with our knowledge, our vaccines. If our policies don’t reflect a more measured and reasonable approach for our children, they will be paying for our generation’s decisions, the rest of their lives. And that, to me, is the greatest underreported story of the past year.

. . .

And now, as the “safe and effective” vaccine narrative blows up like the Hindenburg — and the number of people killed and injured from these shots becomes too enormous for all but the most dishonest to ignore — Democrats are still pushing to inject our kids. 

. . .

What’s the real reason they are going after children with these shots?

We have a pretty good idea why the pharmaceutical companies want to enroll children into this experiment. As RFK Jr. explains... unless the vaccines get placed on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers will lose their legal immunity from liability.

. . .

The tragedy is, too many parents blindly obey these “authorities” and will follow their lead. I can only imagine the level of regret that many of them will feel when they finally snap out of their trance and realize what they’ve done.

Will their children forgive them?

. . .

Children’s lives matter.

Children can't even develop their brains properly because they can't see faces. Anyone who has studied the brain, even on the most superficial level, know that our brains come with an inherent need to seek out faces and process facial expressions. That's how newborns first learn to survive--their mother's face.

Wait until school shootings, child suicides, child gangs and so on become normal.

That's the future these assholes are building for our kids.

That's why they have to be stopped. It's too late for many kids, but not yet too late for the majority.

I rant and rail against Big Pharma, but I am not against it wholesale. Big Pharma has a great side. But it's toxic side is pure evil. And who benefits from removing Big Pharma from legal liability for damage caused by its products? The toxic side, that's who. It's a cancer. So the liability exemption has to go.

I, for one, want the social engineers behind this mess and the toxic people among Big Pharma toadies removed from power and thrown in prison.

Michael

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are calling out Supreme Court Justices Sotomayer, and others, for their wildly inaccurate statements regarding covid figures. Tom Fitton points out how, if left unretracted, this will undermine confidence in the Supreme Court.

I'd like to see that loss of confidence spill over into the election fraud debacle, and how they refused to hear the cases.
 


 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“750 million new Covid cases had been reported in the US yesterday." -Justice Stephen Breyer

Hmmm... Justice Breyer, how's that possible since the population of America is 330 million??

Supreme Court’s liberal justices slammed over vax mandate statements
 

"The trio of Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor made claims during oral arguments that could have been classified as incorrect, ignorant, misinformed or hysterically exaggerated."
--

"When Breyer waded into the fray, he suggested the OSHA rule was needed because 'hospitals are full almost to the point of maximum' and that '750 million new cases' had been reported in the US yesterday — despite the fact that the population of America is around 330 million. "

 

read more here

 
newspress-collage-20756856-1641602767544
NYPOST.COM

The Supreme Court's three liberal justices spewed erroneous comments Friday during oral arguments over the Biden administration's...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any studies used for government approval of pharmaceuticals should not just be available for people to read, I don't know why they can't film the entire thing and let anyone view the footage for free online -- including diligent experts who may be curious.

There is a reproducibility crisis in many scientific fields, and the more information about how a study was performed the better.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Rogan aired a recent podcast with John Abramson , where he talks about his new book Sickening: How Big Pharma Broke American Health Care and How We Can Repair It.

In the interview he describes litigation he was involved in concerning Pharma products and the processes of approval and regulation. He basically talks about how the regulatory process has been captured and the batshit crazy stuff that passes for legitimate or rather legal oversight. 

Things like Pharma companies own the data of their studies and don’t  necessarily have to divulge all the data to regulators , that the agencies make recommendations based on the limited data submitted , that doctors defer to the regulator recommendations ect.

Trust your uninformed doctor ! ‘Oxy’ is way less or not addictive at all, the regulators said so , the guys who have the data but don’t submit it get doctors to push it based on the recommendations , nice system they built there .

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 " OSHA's regulatory authority is a federal 'police power"?

How it started:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

How it’s going:

(Sotomayer): I’m not sure I understand the distinction why the states would have the power but the Federal Government wouldn’t”

 

 
 
 
  • Like 1
  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2022 at 6:02 PM, Dglgmut said:

Well, Ellen already linked this article. The menstrual cycle stuff is well known, but I think most people have written it off as harmless. I think the miscarriages and the shifted cycles are probably connected.

Yeah, but see, the difference is that when Ellen or others say it, they're "emotion, right-wing conspiracy theorists", and they're censored, and told  not to listen to crazy "alt-right" news sources, and to "trust the science"...but when sites like NPR and the New York Times says it...well, let's just say they shouldn't hold their breath for an apology...the gaslighting is real...
 

06virus-menstruation-facebookJumbo.jpg
WWW.NYTIMES.COM

An analysis of thousands of menstrual records offers support for anecdotal reports of erratic cycles after shots.
ap21336609933102_wide-d86272a7f85b8f041b
WWW.NPR.ORG

The new research affirms what many individuals had reported. But it also shows the changes to the menstrual cycle are mostly minor and...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting anomaly, a contrast: while Australia has kept to lock downs and strict border controls - and a vaccine semi-dictatorship, South Africa relaxed the first two. We have been at level 1 for a few months and look to lockdowns quietly disappearing altogether. It was clear the majority here cared little for abiding by locking down, a wave of civil unrest last July warned of that. As for getting mandatory mass-vaccinated, this country could never economically/socially/politically afford the luxury of putting people out of work and from entering shops. One thing the Gvt. knows is that, and the mass upheaval if they tried.

But inexplicably, the picture, presently, is of a strong surge of infections in Aus. Despite their touted, successful measures by the self-congratulating PM the other day, when denying one unvaxxed tennis star entry. (Horse and stable door comes to mind). Today's graph:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjb8YH2saT1AhXMfMAKHSSRDD4QFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgraphics.reuters.com%2Fworld-coronavirus-tracker-and-maps%2Fcountries-and-territories%2Faustralia%2F&usg=AOvVaw3CRPoHnWSt0xaW2_rWg14D

Conversely there is a distinct "plateauing" and fall-off in SA of cases, with much less hospitalization and deaths no more than 6weeks after the Omicron variant was discovered here.  Weather conditions are the same, summer in both places. So the climate plays no part.

The main point: Australia is at 86.4% vaccinated and increasing (coercively); SA at 23.9% and almost flatlined... [Reuters]

How has "stopping the spread" -through-mandated-vaccinating, worked out with you Aussies?

Our accidental 'success story' has been attributed by at least one scientist to SA's high natural herd immunity (due entirely, one would think to the above mentioned resistance by the poorer people who ignored social distancing, etc. during the early waves. True, early Delta brought a substantial death toll within the high risk groups, which could have been mitigated by promoting better science and treatments, but the bulk who easily survived infection, mostly untouched, would now seem safe - without vaccinations and boosters).

The South African 'model' should at minimum be studied for what 'we' sorta did right by pragmatically doing next to nothing. By a Govt. (happily) unable, under-financed, undermanned and inept at enforcing the harsh rules they set, on a populace which largely has not bothered to obey.

And right, we have the sanctimonious, foaming vaxxers here on social media, too. All the angrier because they are ignored or mocked by the 'lower classes' whom they don't dare directly call out nor condemn (fearing 'racism' accusations) .

Moral of the story: Has everything, 2 years of the harsh global interventions to a pandemic and the seen and unseen consequences - been one gigantic waste?

106836741-1612732287866-gettyimages-1230
TRC.TABOOLA.COM

There are early, tentative signs that the omicron wave has peaked, or is plateauing, in the places that were among the first to be hit hard by...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ThatGuy said:

Wait, now CNN's chief potato, Brian Stetler, is calling out the CDC? Have we now crossed over into the upside-down from STRANGER THINGS?
 

 

TG,

OMG.

It's way worse than what you said.

Look at the part before they talked about the CDC.

Granted, the CDC part is awful for the CDC and the COVID narrative, but any virus (or toxic message) needs a conduit to spread its mayhem. And media is the CDC's conduit.

So let's look at the conduit.

Genius lady doctor Lucy McBride actually said this on air:

Quote

LM: We have an obligation to help people frame risk, to deliver fact-based nuanced information. Fear does harm. It only makes people afraid. It doesn't affect people's decisions.


. . .

Fear isn't motivating. Fear just makes people afraid.

Wait, wait, wait.

Did I just hear that right? Doofus lady says fear doesn't affect people's decisions? Fear isn't motivating?

What planet does this lady think she's on?

Fear is one of the prime motivators inside the human brain. Just ask the amygdala. :) 

Any propagandist worth his salt knows that fear is the glue that holds a crowd together. Gin up the fear, then point people to a scapegoat while telling them you have the solution to their fears, then watch what happens. This has not changed throughout human history and it always works (unless overused, which is what happened at CNN these days).

Why would a lady with PhD qualifications say something so stupid and so wrong on TV?

As I have studied propaganda, the reason I see is she is trying to deflect. The media screwed up big-time on COVID and overused fear to the point where it's not working anymore. The boy cried wolf too often and nobody believes him anymore.

So rather than just letting go of the fear porn (we can call it the fear-based core story), this lady is saying fear is not relevant to people's behavior. It's only relevant to how they feel, essentially their mood.  A friggin' PhD said that! She used different words, but that's essentially what she said.

But why this segment now? Well, it sounds to me like some big money people are roasting the CNN news staff for all the fear porn that is losing ratings. 

OK. Someone should tell doofus lade you don't solve a problem by denying it.

And me? Hell, I don't mind. The lady is a doofus and beyond correcting. She is either too stupid or too dishonest to correct. So I hope CNN continues denying the problem. As CNN exists, it needs to go off the air and into history. I don't know if it can be fixed.

 

My view of the problem got confirmed by the next guest Brian Stelter brought on, Oliver Darcy.

Quote

BS: Is the media, at this point, out of touch with the public about COVID?

OD: A lot of the media does seem, when I look at it and travel the country, to be very out of touch with people. I mean, when you travel the country, people are not living in the same bubble  it seems that most of the media is messaging toward. And so I think this is an issue because, if people are tuning out, what's going on in cable news? If we're not messaging toward the general population... They're just, you know, ignoring everything and living their lives and we're not really getting the information then need to them.

(Hey! I just now noticed the initials. How apt. :) )

Darcy basically said the media is no longer controlling people and lamenting that fact.

This is what is behind their big problem over at CNN. They are not interested in informing people, but instead, they want to control people's behavior.

They are not only screwing up big-time on that score, now they have to to let go of fear porn, and fear porn is the only thing that's worked for them consistently up to now. Add a load of fear to cherry-picked news, or even made-up news, and you change people's behavior. Man, how that has worked for them over the years.

But now that goddam boy cried wolf too often.

So they've got nothing. Suddenly, they are floundering around trying to come up with something that will work, but they're not even addressing human motivation correctly. All they're doing is denying the role of fear and noting that they are getting more irrelevant with each passing day. 

Thank God and may it continue.

I even think they followed with derogatory comments on the CDC because they were talking to the money people who are chewing on their asses. They are trying to point the finger at the CDC and say, "It's all their fault. It's not our fault. It's their fault."

With just a little work, this thing could be right out of Atlas Shrugged.

:) 

Michael

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

With just a little work, this thing could be right out of Atlas Shrugged.

"I couldn't help it!", cried James Taggart...

(Reminds me of that scene from ATLAS where a low-level employee was used as the proverbial scapegoat, to take the fall for the big-wigs...and it's a common trope on tv now to have a stupid character promoted beyond their skill in order to have them take the fall, in general...life imitating art imitating life...)

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Marc,

I've got something really nice about Trudeau.

Watch what happens when he sits down beside Brazilian President Bolsonaro.

Heh heh heh...

:)

Michael

Oh Babbbbbyyyyyyyy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now