Ellen Stuttle

Members
  • Posts

    7,080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

Everything posted by Ellen Stuttle

  1. Michael, Thanks for checking. I hope the issue is just some sort of temporary technical glitch and not that Telegram has disenabled the account. Lin's other Telegram account, LinWoodChannel, is still working. The following link goes to the most recent post there. https://t.me/LinWoodChannel/5733 He duplicates some but not all of his "speakstruth" posts on the "Channel" channel. I was hoping to see what he had to say about the Georgia GOP primaries - the results of which look SO obviously rigged - but if he's been expounding on that subject on "speakstruth," he's been sparse in copying to "Channel." Ellen
  2. Michael, Right, I won’t be watching the video, but thanks for the synopsis. Lin's increasingly been making me wonder if his circuitry is quite in working order. Meanwhile, I'm not able to access his Telegram account. I get "invalid address" notices. Would you try this link to see what you get? (It's the link to his forward of the now-deleted post by Kandiss Taylor.) https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/13012 Ellen
  3. I rescind the suggestion entirely. Looks like the interpretation (that Kandiss Taylor has been acting as an undercover anti-Trumper) was part of Lin's current seeing enemies everywhere among people he formerly considered allies. The quoted comment isn’t there at this time on Kandiss' Telegram account. I presume it was # 2513, which is missing from the sequence. A bit later Kandiss wrote: I've spent the last couple hours reading her Telegram posts starting from May 20. I think she's fully sincere. Ellen
  4. Kandiss Taylor acting as an undercover never-Trumper getting votes Perdue would have gotten if she hadn’t been in the race? See: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/13012 She's quoted by Lin Wood as saying "Trump got Trumped." And see Lin's comments just above the quote from Taylor: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/13011 Ellen
  5. Michael, I'd be grateful if you'd synopsize what sorts of things MAGA people are saying about the possibility that Barnette's candidacy will have had the result of a U.S. Senate slot not going to someone Trump friendly. Is she being castigated? Ellen
  6. I'm sad to say: If Barnette hadn’t been in the race, thus splitting the MAGA vote, Oz would have had too huge a margin for this shenanigan to work: It's Déjà Vu All Over Again: Is the Uniparty Stealing PA GOP Primary from Dr. Oz? - They're Delaying Results in Allegheny County -Third World Tactics WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM Who is hedge fund CEO David McCormick? A recent fundraiser sponsor in New York for David McCormick was the founder of a consulting firm representing the controversial Dominion Voting Systems. McCormick... Ellen
  7. I've been doing a bit of looking about Oz. Seems he has some stuff right about the pandemic. On the other hand, seems he has a history of peddling junk. (It's that history which I've vaguely heard about before.) Ellen
  8. I think that Barnette's awfully good at it if she is a put on. My (minimal) impression of Oz is that he's a thorough con. I'm hoping that she'll win, but I'm doubtful that she will, especially considering Trump's statement. Ellen
  9. Suppose the Bigot Barnette campaign misfired big time…. How has the left painted Trump? Homophobic, misogynist, xenophobic, racist. But Trump won - twice. Maybe the homophobic charge against Barnette is real, but even if so, I don’t think it would necessarily be a detriment with heartland Pennsylvanians. Ellen
  10. Gotta say it. Wow, she's fantastic. How wonderful it would be if she does win. Ellen
  11. Brant, Try this URL: https://www.objectivistliving.com/discover/ It should take you directly to the Activity feed. You probably have a cached URL that goes by way of Forums: https://www.objectivistliving.com/forums/discover/ That URL doesn’t work now. —- I’m not returning to posting. Along with my eye difficulties, I’m in too much pain from post-polio syndrome to be writing posts. I just wanted to help Brant out. —- William, someplace in the last few weeks you mentioned that you sent me a snail-mail missive. Whatever became of that - maybe it was misaddressed - it didn’t arrive here. Ellen
  12. You didn’t understand the question, but never mind. Ellen
  13. Have you been consulting books on Delphic oracularism? Ellen
  14. Gaack. Trump would have to do some heavy apologizing to restore my opinion of his honesty after those remarks. I think that there's no way he could still be so ignorant. I've started to agree with you in viewing Trump as a second-choice candidate, better than a Democrat but not the person I'd want if I could have my preference. Ellen
  15. Michael, I suspect that there are folks at the FDA who are good enough at cellular biology not to have needed clinical trials in order to anticipate trouble. I could anticipate trouble just from reading about the mechanism, and the FDA safety assessors are supposed to be experts. Presumably, some of them really are experts. Regarding Trump and his role in getting the mRNA pseudo-vaccines on the market, my point is that I think that long term it's going to be harmful to his reputation for him to be claiming credit for whatever impetus he provided. The stuff is a medical-practice-induced disaster. This will become more and more obvious as time goes on. I think that at least from prudence Trump would be wise to start bailing out. Maybe he judges the timing differently and that's why he's holding back. My impression, though, is that he still hasn’t caught up to reality on the issue. Ellen
  16. Michael, Mark can correct me if I'm wrong in interpreting what he meant by "anti-semitism" - note the hyphen. I think that what he was talking about is what Jeff Riggenbach called "Professional Jewishness." It's a victim-status ploy like "woke." Ellen
  17. I'd reverse it. Trump seems to be saying: The vaccines are safe and effective today like the election results were dishonest and corrupt in November. Ellen
  18. About Robert Malone's connection to the mRNA "vaccines," what he contributed, in 1987, was showing that mRNA encased in a lipid nanoparticle could slip into cells in animal tissue. It was a long way from that demonstration to developed "vaccines." Ellen
  19. Michael, I don’t understand what you mean. Of course Mark and I know each other in the sense of being on the same discussion list, just as everyone else here knows each other in that sense. What did you think he meant, that he’d never heard of me before? You've seen list exchanges between us. Ellen
  20. My doctor no longer recommends that people get the shots. He listened to me and learned some things he didn’t know. Politics had no part in the discussion. Ellen
  21. Speaking of copy editing, the election results were dishonest and corrupt, but the vaccines weren’t and aren’t safe and effective. Ellen
  22. Yes, I do know. And I know Jews who say the same, with the same meaning. I also think that this thread isn’t the place for trying to explain the subtlety, and I don’t want to go into it on the other thread either. —- Regarding our knowing each other, I took you to mean that we've never met or had any contact with each other outside of internet fora. We've rarely even exchanged private messages. A brief exchange years ago when there was flap about you on OL. Possibly a few times when I sent off-list copy editing corrections to ARI articles. (I don’t remember if I sent any of those off-list or mentioned all of them on-list.) And, in March or April of this year, a brief couple notes about volition, with side reference to Vienna. (This was when, briefly, Larry and I thought we'd be able to go to Vienna this last May.) Ellen
  23. What you think you've seen isn’t there. Likewise about Mark. I argued with you, and with Barbara, once upon a time over whether Mark is antisemitic. He's anti America being run to suit Israel. It isn’t the same thing, I don’t want to argue the issue again. I think that Mark doesn’t want arguing about it either. I debated even mentioning it. But silence might have seemed to be acquiescence. Ellen
  24. Actually, yes, a number of times, although not to political positions. Ellen
  25. Michael, This isn’t an issue of gotchas or of "misfires and campaign rhetoric." It's an issue of people's lives and health, of children growing up damaged. There are monsters behind all this who want the population weeded. Every day those pseudo-vaccines are on the market and being jabbed into people is a day of more needless deaths and current damage and future damage set in motion. This is not trivial brush-off stuff. If Trump would come out and tell truth on this one, it would help so much toward ending the decimation. Ellen