Ellen Stuttle

That's peculiar, since having Covid confers natural immunity. Maybe he didn’t really have it the first time, just a false-positive PCR, or doesn’t really have it now, or both. I doubt that whatever Jabs he got contained anything more potent than glucose. As Pfizer CEO, he has to have known about the adverse-reaction cases that were thrown out of the clinical trials that were submitted for FDA Emergency Authorization. Ellen

A psychiatrist isn’t needed to diagnose me as "agitated" reading this stuff. I’m experiencing what I suppose is meant in speaking of one's blood boiling. Always the proofreader (even with boiling blood), a couple details I noticed: "complex is defined as you either incubated them or…" intubated (incubated is apropos, but…) "Plus they get a 20% bump through Medicare if they offer Remdesivir to the exclusion of any other remedy. If they don't give Ivermectin, they have to exclude it. [That is, the hospital has to exclude Ivermectin and other such drugs in order to get the bounty for administering Remdesivir.]" Maybe Hamilton said "don't," but that makes the meaning backward. Thanks for the transcript segment. Ellen PS: Nuremberg Take Two can't get here fast enough to suit me.

Right. The mRNA stuff has very particular and delicate care requirements to keep it viable. As tmj has pointed out a few times, chances are good that a lot of the doses people get at pharmacies haven’t been handled with the necessary preservation procedures and aren’t viable. In other words, some people, probably to their good fortune, are basically getting placebos. The reverse would be expectable at hospitals. The doctors who died would likely have received viable Jabs. Ellen

Mark, With few exceptions, I'm not going to watch or even listen to without watching a video. Both the flicker and something in the sound characteristics give me trouble. Is there a particular question you'd like my opinion about? I’m strongly in favor of suing hell out of hospitals that have been engaging in murder, if that’s what you want to know. Adding some material to Michael’s quotes from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's, bookThe Real Anthony Fauci. This is from a write-up (link) by the Children's Health Defense California Chapter about the September 7th Landmark Remdesivir Press Conference in Fresno, California. Watkins and Hamilton were two of the participants. Dr. Bryan Ardis, a retired chiropractor, was another. === Start Quote Dr. Bryan Ardis, retired chiropractor, and outspoken expert on Remdesivir After losing his Father in Law to an ill advised COVID protocol in 2020, Dr. Ardis began to dig deeper. One of the first red flags was Dr. Anthony Fauci’s declaration “There is only 1 antiviral experimental drug that can be used for hospitalized COVID-19 Americans”. “My first thought was, if this is experimental, it is NOT FDA approved, which means it has not been reviewed and it has not been found effective.” stated Dr. Brian Ardis. Dr. Ardis went back and looked at Dr. Anthony Fauci’s declaration and clicked on the first hyperlink to the study on Remedesivir for Ebola. “Imagine my shock, all I did was click the link and read the study”. The first page of the study reveals the 4 experimental drugs used on the Ebola study. On August 9th, 2019 the safety board found that Remdesivir was the ONLY drug in the study that had a fatality rate over 50%. Why did Anthony Fauci come out and say Remdesivir was safe and effective when the safety board for the study came out and said it was the most deadly and ineffective drug and withdrawn from the trial? Why would Fauci lie? Who funded the Ebola trial? Anthony Fauci’s NIH Department. This means that every piece of information from the study went back to Dr. Fauci. In December 2019 the results of this study were published. The very next month, January of 2020, the NIH went to Gilead, and said “we know your drug got kicked out of the Ebola trial because it killed 53% of the people, but there is a new pandemic going around and we are going to let you use this on them for 10 days”. Gilead reported that 31% of COVID patients given Remdesivir developed multiple organ failure, septic shock, hypotension, acute kidney failure and some people could not even make it the full 10 days because of severe liver failure and the need for a kidney transplant. “Immediately it hit me. Everything I was hearing from the media out of New York, “Doctors have never seen anything like this before. We start treating this disease and within 48 hours it starts moving from the lungs and attacks the kidneys and it is causing severe acute kidney injury or failure within 24-48 hours” It was not the virus killing hospitalized COVID patients, it was the Remdesivir drug. === End Quote Ellen

Quoting Peter McCullough from Marc's post just above: "emotionally inert to the loss of a family member because it's happened at the end of a hypodermic needle…" Oh wow! If that isn’t chilling…! Ellen

I haven’t read the article yet, but I was thinking the same reading your description of it. About "anti-intellectualism" - consider the kind of swill intellectuals in the main produce, swill they’re trained to produce, swill they're almost required to produce in order to get Ph.D.s. Being anti that stuff is sane. Re William, I suspect that he'd like to be one of the technos in Great Reset Paradise. Ellen

By 2024, we'll be having indications of long-term effects from the Jabs. I fear that the dimensions of the disaster are going to be huge, and I hope that Trump is going to start soon to remove the Jabs Albatross from his neck as best he can. Ellen

I'm hoping that this one will backfire, that people are so tired of nearly three years of restrictions and hardships they’ll be saying, "Now wait a minute. You want us to freeze to death too?" Ellen

Adding something I didn’t have time to say earlier: I went to William's Twitter account inadvertently. My finger glanced against a click point while I was scrolling an OL page. I don't know if William habitually retweets stuff by people who harp on the "fascist" labeling of Trump and his supporters. But considering how long and extensively he's participated on OL, I think that William has no plausible excuse for not knowing better himself. Ellen

If you want an unvarnished view of William's opinion of Trump supporters, take a look at this crud William retweeted - a whole string of Tweets by the same person. (Scroll up from the linked Tweet to see the full series.) https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1571716388439441411 Ellen

What are the health authorities saying about the deaths? My suspicion is something along the lines of: "Nothing to see here, just a coincidence, move on." Ellen

I’m quoting the whole post for context, since the post was on the previous page and meanwhile discussion has switched topics to election fraud. (Is that caused by the Covid-19 virus?) Highlighting this statement: "According to the study, for every one COVID hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, '18 to 98 actual serious adverse events' have been caused." I am doubtful that the Jabs have ANY prophylactic effect whatsoever. I think that the claim of "reduced severity" is a lingering fiction - the only remaining rationale advocates of Jabbing have. Ellen

Conspiracy theory time. First, Michael, no one (unless I missed it) has said that Trump "should have known what we know now." Second, I suspect….that the full scope of the plot still hasn’t emerged. I'll just pose this. It's from things I've gleaned and pieced together from here, there, and the other where. During the height of the pandemic, I read quite a few speculations that the purpose of the pandemic was to keep Trump from being re-elected. Certainly the economic havoc produced was destructive to what he'd achieved in getting prosperity on the roll, and I think that economic havoc was an important goal of the pandemic engineers. However, I think that the pandemic was planned before there was ever a glimmer of a thought in anyone's mind that Donald Trump would be the 45th President of the United States. I think that the pandemic was supposed to have happened in the last year of Hillary Clinton's first term in office. She would have imposed draconian lockdowns. And vaccine mandates. Which brings me to your belief that Trump "was elated that they had done it against all odds." My belief is that "it" - meaning successful production of mRNA injections - had been done before the virus was released and that getting people injected was the biggest goal. I.e., the Jabs were the primary purpose of the pandemic. That Rockefeller Foundation thing TG posted lends weight to my suspicion. If I'm right, the full magnitude of the evil is still to be revealed. Ellen

I suspect that you're not finding the quote because you're misremembering - even reversing - what Rand said. What Rand said is: "I can bear to look around me levelly. I can’t bear to look down. I want to look up." Man in the Place of the Gods BOOKS.GOOGLE.COM WHO SAYS SECULAR PEOPLE CANT BE SPIRITUAL? What do cities mean to you? Excitement? Dreams and goals? Glamor? Escape? Danger? Romance? Artistically planned parks, zoos and museums... Ellen PS: I don’t remember exactly where Rand made that remark, and the original source didn’t come up on a quick Google search. The book I linked to, which contains the quote, looks like something I'd like. PPS: Here's another quote: A quote from Atlas Shrugged WWW.GOODREADS.COM Do you know the hallmark of a second rater? It's resentment of another man's achievement. Those touchy mediocrities who sit trembling lest someone's... PPPS: This is odd. When I look up the quote from the Cities book via Google, I get the whole page, but when I click on the link in this post, I only get a snippet. Let's see what happens if I post just the URL without embedding: https://books.google.com/books?id=9AYwDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT27&lpg=PT27&dq=Rand+"can't+bear+to+look+down"&source=bl&ots=lA1U19unVt&sig=ACfU3U1QoUIr-BkFqaW-UYGtkynG8d-3Rw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiM0oPss_L5AhX2EmIAHQe3Cv8Q6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=Rand "can't bear to look down"&f=false Yes, that works.

Marc, Thanks, and apology accepted, and of course I knew that you don’t really think of me as an enemy. Regarding Trump's Jabs remarks last Fall, we'll just have to disagree. You mentioned that there were numerous of his supporters who, like me, objected to what he said. I was impressed at the time (and remain impressed) by the lack of hesitation on the part of people who admire Trump enormously to disagree and be vocal about it when they think he's goofed. Shows that they assess for themselves, no knee-jerking. I worried, however, that there were those (I couldn’t guess at how many) who hadn’t looked into the Jabs issue themselves and presumed that he had looked into it and proceeded to get Jabbed - some of them maybe fatally - on his say-so. I hope not many. (None would be best.) Here's to "Nuremberg Take Two." May it come soon! Ellen

That sends freezing chills down my spine. Realistically regarding the pandemic, a "vaccination" push wouldn’t be needed at this point even if the stuff was effective, which it isn’t. Combine that with its being the Rockefeller Foundation pushing the "narrative" project. The Rockefeller Foundation sees "overpopulation" as a problem. Makes me wonder if there actually is something which could be "triggered" in the Jabs. Or maybe there are people connected with the project who have some advance information on potential long-term harm. In short, sounds to me like, let's get rid of more people by talking them into being Jabbed. Ellen

Marc, Now you’ve switched the issue to the stolen election. I have no doubt that the election was stolen. Also, I agree with you about not putting 2020 "behind us." I think that the fact of the heist needs to be acknowledged and the cheat machines put out of use. I don’t know if there are available procedures for redressing the theft. I have very little knowledge of legal issues generally or of Constitutional Law specifically. If I might remind you what this discussion was about, and then I hope you'll stop trying to make an enemy of someone who isn’t one. Michael made a post saying that now there are people blaming Trump for the Jabs. I said that I'd predicted that that would happen and that unfortunately Trump played into the accusations with his remarks about the Jabs last Fall. You then said that no way could The Grandmaster have put his foot in it. 4-D chess, he's ahead of the game, yadda. Fact is, his remarks weren’t a good move. Regarding how the Jabs drama will play out: I’m hoping for Nuremberg-style trials. I don’t believe that Trump is actually culpable for his role, since I think that he was deceived and he didn’t have the kind of knowledge background to know better. I hope that by now he’s learned that he was used. Ellen

Marc, At least you've stated that you don’t think that Trump was treating people as pawns, though you continue not to say if you think that he knew better last Fall when he called the Jabs wonderful. I'll come back in a moment to Operation Warp Speed. First addressing Michael's question "Why is it either-or?" I'm not the one who's been making it either-or. Marc seems to find the idea that Trump "made a terrible mistake" inconceivable - although maybe he's progressed, since he does say that "Brix or Birx and Fauci tricked the world and they did a number on Trump too" (emphasis added). This appears to indicate that the Great One can be tricked. As to Operation Warp Speed, I guess you forget, Marc, that I've said several times that I had alarm bells ringing as soon as I read a description of how the damned mRNA stuff works. I dreaded the FDA approval, dreaded it, and I was in tears when the stuff was approved for children. I wish that Trump had not pushed for speed. If instead he'd been cautious, I'd be applauding now - although I think that the stuff would have been approved whatever Trump did. Fortunes to be made. Ellen

Marc, I think that you're still avoiding the issue of whether or not you believe that Trump was treating people's lives as pawns with his still referring to the Jabs as "our wonderful vaccines" last Fall. Is it your opinion that he knew better or that he was still ignorant? Ellen PS: TG, THANKS for your replies to Marc. Bravo!

Yeah, great. Playing chess with people's lives. You can praise it, I do not if that's what Trump was doing in still talking about "our wonderful vaccines" last fall. I think he was being ego-invested and slow to see reality. That isn’t a favorable evaluation but it’s significantly better by my standards than your "chess-playing" interpretation. Ellen

I see. Oh, my. Meanwhile, I recommend that people read the whole excerpt I posted from Judgment Day. I looked that up just because I thought it included mention of the dirt road - as indeed it does. However, I copied the whole passage because…talk about the art of storytelling. It's really well told. Ellen

Um, successful crystal-ball-gazing time. I predicted back in November that there would be efforts to blame Trump. I think he was being set up as fall guy from before the FDA approval - and he was walking into it with his extolling "our wonderful vaccines." I haven’t heard anything lately about his still touting the Jabs. I hope he's learned better. I wish he'd learned better by September/October last year. Many lives might have been saved if he'd said "Oops" then. Ellen

Tony, Maybe this article would help with understanding sentiment in the UK and Canada. Understanding the Ukrainian SS Galicia Division Helps explain UK and Canadian support for Ukraine WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM If you want to understand why the UK and Canada are so hard over in their support for Ukraine, you have to look back to the end of World War II. Ukrainians were recruited and inducted into the Waffen-SS Division... The concluding paragraph of the (long) article: Ellen

Michael, Guess what. Apparently you think you're arguing with me about something, but I have no idea about what. Rand's "grumpiness" re lost running boards? I haven’t seen the video. There wasn’t a mention of "grumpiness" in the posts I read, just an issue of when running boards were discontinued on cars (I don’t know) and whether Frank and Ayn (who would have been in the car as passenger, since she didn’t drive) drove on dirt roads. Answer to that, yes. Ellen

Plus - I signed back in to add this comment to the "livestock" comparison: There's also the population control benefit from a Reset standpoint. Guys without testes. Gals without ovaries. No sperm. No ova. No babies. Ellen