Objectivism Online run by hypocritical babies?


blackhorse

Recommended Posts

Not just Galt sprang into being perfect.

How about Roark?

Here is a very wise paragraph from The Benefits and Hazards of the Philosophy of Ayn Rand: A Personal Statement by Nathaniel Branden:

In preparation for this presentation, I re-read the opening chapter of The Fountainhead. It really is a great book. I noticed something in the first chapter I never noticed before. Consider these facts: The hero has just been expelled from school, he is the victim of injustice, he is misunderstood by virtually everyone, and he himself tends to find other people puzzling and incomprehensible. He is alone; he has no friends. There is no one with whom he can share his inner life or values. So far, with the possible exception of being expelled from school, this could be a fairly accurate description of the state of the overwhelming majority of adolescents. There is one big difference: Howard Roark gives no indication of being bothered by any of it. He is serenely happy within himself. For average teenagers, this condition is agony. They read The Fountainhead and see this condition, not as a problem to be solved, but as a condition they must learn to be happy about -- as Roark is. All done without drugs! What a wish-fulfillment that would be! What a dream come true! Don't bother learning to understand anyone. Don't bother working at making yourself better understood. Don't try to see whether you can close the gap of your alienation from others, at least from some others, just struggle for Roark's serenity -- which Rand never tells you how to achieve. This is an example of how The Fountainhead could be at once a source of great inspiration and a source of great guilt, for all those who do not know how to reach Roark's state.


Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That tape is excellent. He did grow. But I think he had no choice. With or without the break, I don't think he would have survived much longer. From his description in his book about meeting Patrecia, and although he considered her not too intellectual, she was a breath of fresh air in his life that he couldn't give up. I don't think the Collective was big on fresh air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one big difference: Howard Roark gives no indication of being bothered by any of it.

He is serenely happy within himself.

For average teenagers, this condition is agony.

Thank you Michael.

That never hit me the way it did today.

I felt peer pressure like that, however, I always felt comfortable with myself and walking alone with my decisions, good ones, as well as bad ones.

Looking back, I had some bouts of questioning whether I should sacrifice my beliefs to "be accepted," and, when it came down to the decision point, I always trusted my own judgement.

Guess I was fortunate to have a strong mind.

A...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

The thing is, I'm not sure Rand herself had Roark's kind of serenity when she was that age. I wasn't there, but, since she was a human being, and the stage of teenage angst is universal to healthy individuals, its a pretty good assumption she had her own inner turmoil to deal with.

And don't forget what the sex hormones do to teenagers. :smile:

I don't know about you, but I was lucky I didn't hump a wall back when I was that age.

Terribly confusing... :smile:

Michael

EDIT: Rand's rough sex came from somewhere... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

The thing is, I'm not sure Rand herself had Roark's kind of serenity when she was that age. I wasn't there, but, since she was a human being, and the stage of teenage angst is universal to healthy individuals, its a pretty good assumption she had her own inner turmoil to deal with.

And don't forget what the sex hormones do to teenagers. :smile:

I don't know about you, but I was lucky I didn't hump a wall back when I was that age.

Terribly confusing... :smile:

Michael

EDIT: Rand's rough sex came from somewhere... :smile:

Agreed.

That was a difficult piece of self discipline for me.

I can remember my first "soul kiss" in a movie theatre at 15.

I also can absolutely remember my first full sexual romp at 16 in my room in my parent's house.

Thank heaven for condoms and the knowledge that my parents imparted to me about protection.

When you have great parents, you need to heed their advice on certain issues lol.

A...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had great parents, and they gave me no advice or information on this aspect of life. My mother did say a lot about it once when I was seven, but it meant nothing to me and she was not herself at the time. I was not alone either; my best friend and I spent lots of time trying to figure it out ... I was actually fifteen when I realized how the bio facts went together ... not joking. My friend got pregnant at seventeen.. she was the ditz of our group and is still vague about how it happened.

Carol

ex sheltered only child

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had great parents, and they gave me no advice or information on this aspect of life. My mother did say a lot about it once when I was seven, but it meant nothing to me and she was not herself at the time. I was not alone either; my best friend and I spent lots of time trying to figure it out ... I was actually fifteen when I realized how the bio facts went together ... not joking. My friend got pregnant at seventeen.. she was the ditz of our group and is still vague about how it happened.

Carol

ex sheltered only child

I always tried to stay away from the "ditzes"...even if they were hot and available and there were more than enough opportunities...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Becoming a fully rational human is a choice,

A...

Not for John Galt. He was born that way.

Speaking of biting a head off and posting...

Ha, ha. I admit it. I'm a self-serving hypocrite.

--Brant

evil exposed but not shriveling in the sun: potent, potent, potent!

(contradictions don't exist?--yeah, right)

what?--I only made a "mistake"?--that's no fun--for us actors being evul is fun--but I'd do it again; I'd do it for fun

put me on trial: all my posts on OL (if I can only figure out how to print them out): "The defense rests."

pulling "a Phryne in court" (I believe the story)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pulling "a Phryne in court" (I believe the story)

We don't need to see your man-boobs.

J

If you don't stop topping me I'm going to stop setting you up!

--Brant

getting really annoyed; it's a self-esteem thingy (I've got enough "pseudo" now I need more of the other to balance it out ["pseudo" is a noun, right?])

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pulling "a Phryne in court" (I believe the story)

We don't need to see your man-boobs.

J

Geez, had to look this one up just to follow you two ...get a room!

220px-Cnidus_Aphrodite_Altemps_Inv8619_n
magnify-clip.png

A copy of the Aphrodite of Knidos. Phryne is said to be the model of the original.

Athenaeus provides many anecdotes about Phryne. He praises her beauty, writing that on the occasion of the festivals of the Eleusinia and Poseidonia she would let down her hair and step naked into the sea. This would have inspired the painter Apelles to create his famous picture of Aphrodite Anadyomene (Ἀφροδίτη Ἀναδυομένη, also portrayed at times as Venus Anadyomene).

Supposedly the sculptor Praxiteles, who was also her lover, used her as the model for the statue of the Aphrodite of Knidos.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phryne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carol, i was older than 15. Embarrassing. But I had a system. since I grew up believing President and Mrs. Kennedy was god-like, and since I couldn't picture Jackie having sex, I decided the information I had must be wrong. how's that for sex education? Blessed be the libraries and their books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly [bob K] didn't see either of my posts about his potshot, or the post where I challenged him when he made the same irresponsible charge earlier. I think he sometimes posts on a thread and then doesn't look to see if anyone's replied to what he said.

His describing those people as "strange" does irritate me, and I hope he won't do it again. If he does and I notice, I'll correct him again.

Funny thing is, he was often quite complimentary to Barbara when she was posting here, and then he lumps her, willy-nilly, amongst the "strange people" of Rand's circle.

My hunch is that he's simply thinking of Peikoff and not pausing to consider who the others were.

Ellen

What about Mary Ann? Did you know her? I see her as being more like Peikoff than the others. Maybe not to the point of being "strange," but at least severely "icky."

J

I didn't know her. I only met her once, at Allan Blumenthal's recital in spring 1970.

She seemed to me just a not very smart person who was way impressed by Rand. According to an interview with her conducted by Susan Ludel back when the ARI publication was a mimeographed-from-typewriter-copy job, she (Mary Ann) became close friends with Leonard Peikoff and was taught Objectivism by Leonard. He was assigned by Rand to the project of teaching Mary Ann. [*]

Ellen

* ADD: The philosophy wasn't called Objectivism yet. And it wasn't just Mary Ann to whom Leonard gave lectures on the philosophy. See post #163.

Edited by Ellen Stuttle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Volitional consciousness": that's when you decide to go to bed, turning it off by going to sleep. If the alarm clock wakes you up it's because that's the time you decided to turn your consciousness back on. [....]

Why is there a large market in sleeping medications if consciousness can simply be turned off? And what relationship does an alarm clock waking you up have to Rand's statement delivered by Galt?

I wonder how long it's been since you read Galt's Speech.

Ellen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Volitional consciousness": that's when you decide to go to bed, turning it off by going to sleep. If the alarm clock wakes you up it's because that's the time you decided to turn your consciousness back on. [....]

Why is there a large market in sleeping medications if consciousness can simply be turned off? And what relationship does an alarm clock waking you up have to Rand's statement delivered by Galt?

I wonder how long it's been since you read Galt's Speech.

Ellen

I don't think I would relieve your frustration by answering your ad hominem question dressed as a statement, ironically not a fallacy. (Second time already today I've used the ironic.) In any case, there's a kind of beauty in mystery destroyed by reality and I'll not visit that upon you. (Squirm, squirm.)

--Brant

I first read it in 1963--use that to fire up your brain cells (I've begun to have senior moments: yesterday I called my insurance company for a tow instead of AAA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Volitional consciousness": that's when you decide to go to bed, turning it off by going to sleep. If the alarm clock wakes you up it's because that's the time you decided to turn your consciousness back on. [....]

Why is there a large market in sleeping medications if consciousness can simply be turned off? And what relationship does an alarm clock waking you up have to Rand's statement delivered by Galt?

I wonder how long it's been since you read Galt's Speech.

Ellen

I wonder how long it's been since anybody read Galt's Speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how long it's been since anybody read Galt's Speech.

LOL..Hell, I skipped it the first time I read Atlas and I would say it has been at least four (4) years since I've read and at least a decade prior to that that I read it.

So that would be two (2) times in the two (2) decades which is more than enough to keep my small "o"bjectist card current and in good standing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how long it's been since anybody read Galt's Speech.

LOL..Hell, I skipped it the first time I read Atlas and I would say it has been at least four (4) years since I've read and at least a decade prior to that that I read it.

So that would be two (2) times in the two (2) decades which is more than enough to keep my small "o"bjectist card current and in good standing.

That's twice more than most people...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how long it's been since anybody read Galt's Speech.

LOL..Hell, I skipped it the first time I read Atlas and I would say it has been at least four (4) years since I've read and at least a decade prior to that that I read it.

So that would be two (2) times in the two (2) decades which is more than enough to keep my small "o"bjectist card current and in good standing.

That's twice more than most people...

I (me) think (believe) that I've read (perused) it four (4) (IV) (the integer between three (3) and five (5)) times (instances) during my lifetime (the years that I've been alive).

J (Jonathan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now