Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Man, did this feel good. I'm glad Mark Levin is back. From Breitbart: Levin: Fox News ‘Imploding’; Megyn Kelly ‘Out of Control,’ ‘Auditioning’ for a Bigger Forum (I tried to embed the video from the article, but it comes with autostart in the script that can't be deactivated, so go to the link to see the video.) (EDIT: I found a YouTube video:) Ahhhh... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 52 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Man, did this feel good. I'm glad Mark Levin is back. From Breitbart: Levin: Fox News ‘Imploding’; Megyn Kelly ‘Out of Control,’ ‘Auditioning’ for a Bigger Forum (I tried to embed the video from the article, but it comes with autostart in the script that can't be deactivated, so go to the link to see the video.) (EDIT: I found a YouTube video:) Ahhhh... Michael He is beautiful in his wrath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 The FBI has just reopened the Clinton email investigation around 1pm Friday October, 28, 2016. All committee heads like Ron Johnson and Chaffitz are being notified. The FBI head agrees they will reexamine emails based on leaks. He cannot tell us how long it will take, but says he may have stopped the investigation too soon but may not conclude by the time of the election. But, still. It's Friday, I'am in love . . . Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Was it WikiLeaks or were the 33,000 deliberately deleted emails found, or both? will this restore America's faith in the FBI? Peter From FindLaw: How to Avoid Going to Jail under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 for Lying to Government Agents. Did you know that it is a crime to tell a lie to the federal government? Even if your lie is oral and not under oath? Even if you have received no warnings of any kind? Even if you are not trying to cheat the government out of money? Even if the government is not actually misled by your falsehood? Well it is . . . . Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 makes it a crime to: 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) make any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States. Your lie does not even have to be made directly to an employee of the national government as long as it is "within the jurisdiction" of the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Though the falsehood must be "material" this requirement is met if the statement has the "natural tendency to influence or [is] capable of influencing, the decision of the decision making body to which it is addressed." United States v. Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506, 510 (1995). (In other words, it is not necessary to show that your particular lie ever really influenced anyone.) Although you must know that your statement is false at the time you make it in order to be guilty of this crime, you do not have to know that lying to the government is a crime or even that the matter you are lying about is "within the jurisdiction" of a government agency. United States v. Yermian , 468 U.S. 63, 69 (1984). For example, if you lie to your employer on your time and attendance records and, unbeknownst to you, he submits your records, along with those of other employees, to the federal government pursuant to some regulatory duty, you could be criminally liable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Rep Mark Meadows, Republican from North Carolina is saying to Cavuto on Fox, the revealed emails show *intent,* so enough information has come forward to “demand” a reopening of the investigation. Intent to lie and deceive is a crime. This reinforces what the House investigative committee has been saying for months, that The Bitch in Broomstick One (No kidding, this is the name the Secret Service has given Hillary’s jet because she yells, screams, and belittles anyone she thinks is her servant and that includes the Secret Service. She uses the words *fuck* and *motherfucker.*) Rep Ron Desantis Republican from Florida on the House Judiciary Committee, is saying this is extraordinary. He also says *intent* is the key. I can’t wait to hear what Barack has to say. It is possible that by Monday, early voting in Florida and in a few other swing states will show a huge game-changing swing to Sir Donald Trump. Rep Desantis is saying that if anyone else, like someone in the military had opened a parallel email system, they would be in Leavenworth or a military prison. Tim Kaine is out campaigning and acting like nothing has happened. Trump looks like he is busting out in joy. I have got to watch. Bye. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 This is a Rush Limbaugh transcript from yesterday. Although he talks about WikiLinks and other matters at the link below, the excerpt of the transcript quoted the contains one of the best illustrations in simple language of what cronyism looks like in the real world I have ever come across. An Explanation of How Clinton, Inc. Raked in Cash Through Cronyism Although the extract below is a bit long, I have to put it out there. It's too good. The rest of the transcript is, too. From the transcript. Quote ... I think cronyism may be as damaging to what's going on in our country today as other aspects of ideology are, because cronyism is resulting in the people who play in it not caring a whit about what happens to the country. That is the real damage that's being done with cronyism. Now, let me give you an example of cronyism, if you don't know what it is. I don't mean... You know what it is. I want to give you an example of how it happens at the government level. I would love to have the opportunity to tell stories like this or explain things like this to Millennials. Let's say you have a company that is a massively large retail operation, and it's run by a family in a southern state that have always been conservative and Republican. One of the things that this massive corporation has done has been to stay away from hiring union employees, which has made it an enemy of the Democrat Party and of labor unions. And as such, the Democrat Party and everywhere that it holds power -- cities, counties, at the federal government -- makes it really, really hard on this gigantic business because they're not unionized. So they pass special laws saying where they can and cannot build stores, for example. They make massive efforts to punish this company because it's not run the way Democrats think it should be run. Keep in mind during all this, Democrats hold the levers of power and are able, through the regulatory agencies, to exact damage and inflict pain on this company and any other that doesn't play ball. Well, this company doesn't like this. This company doesn't like being targeted. They don't like the negative news every day about how this company doesn't care about the little guy. This company, all it's done is make prices so low that average Americans can afford to buy more than ever before. But the Democrats don't like that, either, because the Democrats want government to be seen as the big provider, not some Republican-run company. If there's gonna be any enterprise out there that average American consumers love and are loyal to, it's gonna be the Democrat Party, not a company run by a bunch of Republicans. So the Democrats and their various offices of power start making it very, very difficult for this company to do business. All the while, this company has competitors sprout up. Big box retailers and others decide they want to get in on the action, but they start playing ball with the Democrats. So the laws that are passed to penalize our original company are not applied to their competitors, because of cronyism. The CEOs and the management team of the competing companies get in bed with the Democrat president or the Democrat borough president or the Democrat Chamber of Commerce president or the Democrat county executive, whatever. Special zoning arrangements are made and tax exemptions are offered that are not offered to our original big company. Therefore, market competition forces are forever altered because the government has swooped in and made it much more difficult for our original company to conduct business as it wants, because it's in bed and helping the competitors. Well, the original company decides it doesn't want to play this way, so it decides it has to get in bed with the Democrat-run government as well. So they start doing things slowly but surely to indicate that they're going to start relaxing some of their business practices the Democrats don't like. In exchange, they're given permission to open a store where they were previously denied it. Little things happen at first. Then, the management team at our original company finally figures it out and realizes that if they're going to really get back to their era of dominance, they, too, are gonna have to get in bed with the Democrats -- in this case Barack Obama. And the way that would happen would be this: The Democrats routinely argue and cry and wallow about the minimum wage. They're always demanding that it be increased. There's a constant debate on whether or not the minimum wage should go up. The minimum wage does not help anybody, and anybody that runs a business knows it. Any small business, large business knows that the minimum wage does the exact opposite of what it promises. It causes people to lose their jobs. It prevents people from being hired in starter positions where they can learn the concepts of showing up for work, doing work, getting paid for doing work, climbing a ladder of success. The minimum wage freezes a whole lot of people out from that opportunity because it limits the number of people that could be hired, because it's an artificial price on labor that's not resulting from market forces. But our big company decides to throw all that out. It knows the minimum wage is no good, it knows the minimum wage is harmful, but it's gotta deal with now an enemy government, it's gotta deal with its competitors who are in bed with government. So what this company decides to do is come out, and against everything it believes, support an increase in the minimum wage. And, as such, gets into bed in a crony relationship with the Democrat president, in this case, Barack Obama, and our giant, big box giant retailer of southern Republicans all of a sudden become the biggest proponents of the minimum wage you've ever seen! And people are scratching their heads, they're going, "How did this happen?" Here's how it happened. It happened because the people at our original company figured out that their competitors may not be able to afford a minimum wage. Our big company, our original company can; they've got a lot of money; they were the first; they're eminently successful. So they make a business decision to support the minimum wage increase. It may cost them some money, but their competitors can't keep up. So without having to innovate, without having to be any better than their competitors, without having to offer anything different, they just get in bed with the current Democrat Party, support the increase in the minimum wage, and for as much as it can be, it's fine with them, because their competitors can't afford it and will have to reduce the size of their operations. Now, all that I've described here has not happened because of what's happening in the market. It hasn't happened because customers prefer this company or that store. It's because everybody's in bed with the government, and the government's picking winners and losers based on whatever it decides can do best to advance its agenda. Meanwhile, a great bunch of people end up being corrupted, forget their ideological and political leanings. And what's good for the country, bad for the country becomes a secondary concern because you don't want to have the government be your enemy. No matter how much money you have, they've got more 'cause they can print it. And so that's cronyism. And that's just one example of it. How about General Electric? General Electric doesn't need to be getting government subsidies for anything! It ends up getting government subsidies to develop this or that, jet engine or whatever. Why? 'Cause their competitors are not getting the subsidy. So getting in bed with a Democrat-run government actually is how they harm their competitors. Not by out-competing them, not by out-producing them, not by out-innovativing them, but simply getting in bed with government and getting favors from government that their competitors are not getting. And this is crony, I call it socialism, not capitalism. This is a bare-essence description of it. Rush was on a roll with that one. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 I can't wait until Sarah's public image is rehabilitated. (I believe helping to make this happen this is a secret plan of Trump's, a present he wants to give her.) For the time being, let her have some fun. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Weinergate? That has a certain “Je ne sais quoi,” don’t it Archie? Damn right, Edith. How dare that bitch call me deplorable when she hires a women who’s husband is a bologna schlong-er wit a wittle baby in da picture? And that investigation leads to more proof that she is a GD traitor! All from his electronic devises. Now Archie, no charges have been filed, yet. But I bet that Julius Assange from Wikileaks is angry. He thought it was because of his exposure. Get it Archie? Exposure? Yeah, Edith I get it. You ain’t dumb. I’ll be back in a little bit. Where are you going? To early vote. And I’m taking Meathead with me just to watch that pinko squirm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Trump announces to crowd the FBI investigation reopen: Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Haha! That aught to get her panties in a knot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backlighting Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 15 minutes ago, Jules Troy said: Haha! That aught to get her panties in a knot! You mean her Depends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Rotfl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Mr. Trump? Don’t fall to it. The Republican establishment will be running to you now. You do not need them. “F” them. Deliver us from evil. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 On 10/25/2016 at 6:50 PM, BaalChatzaf said: Every legal firm in the nation is connected to the government. Period. End of Statement. That is a fact. And your company is included. Have your registered your vehicles. If so you are a government accomplice and patsy. Have you paid sales tax on any purchases. If so you are a government accomplice and a patsy Have you paid property tax and signed a check for the required amount? If so you are a government accomplice and a patsy. Have you ever paid any fees to any government agency. If so you are a government accomplice and a patsy. Did you ever put a coin in a parking meter? etc. etc. Have you ever ridden on an Amtrack train? etc. etc. Have you ever shipped freight on a government subsidized railroad? etc. etc. Have you ever bought gasoline? If so you paid the tax and you are a government stooge and a patsy. And so are we all;. None of this is true unless it applies to you. Are we to take your word for it? The relationship is psychological. When I was a kid I had contempt for public education. But it imprinted me anyway. I've spent decades shucking it off. The biggest imprint is I am an American warrior. Literally and figuratively. I'm only saved by the knowledge that the United States went one way and America another. Greg has made the distinction clear. Even when my hands are empty I see an M-16. I feel it. I don't hate the American government; I want to save it. The libertarian anarchist says that's the fallacy. There is this essential difference between me on the one hand and George H. Smith and Jeff Riggenbach on the other: I am wedded to the state as an ideal and they aren't. (Jeff seems more left libertarian than George. I'm not left at all.) I went to war once. I killed at least one communist (in Cambodia, 1966), maybe more than one. My only point is I can't break free of this I can only break free--and did--of the United States. I agreed with doing a number on Afghanistan in 2001--I think George did too--but when Bush ginned it all up for Iraq I knew it was all a crock. I knew it because I knew war first hand. Fucking oil wars. Bring on the commies! Nazis! Fuck oil! --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Podesta No. 21: RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 21 #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails21 #HillaryClinton https://t.co/wzxeh70oUm pic.twitter.com/kkdyFXmTLD— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 28, 2016 Thud... thud... thud... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Podesta No. 22 RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 22 #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails22 #HillaryClinton https://t.co/wzxeh70oUm pic.twitter.com/QnWewcpPbf— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 29, 2016 (I'm running out of drip taunts. ) Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/29/abc-newswashington-post-tracking-poll-ten-point-swing-donald-trump-four-days/ ABC News - Washington Post tracking poll: "...seven point jump for Trump in just four days. Trump’s opponent Hillary Clinton has seen her numbers drop three points in the same time period, making a 10 point swing in Trump’s favor." Ouch... Ouch... Ouch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Dana Bash on CNN last night was fascinating to watch and listen to. I am always amazed by people who can tell whoppers without laughing. Maybe my sense of humor is too strong or my conscience too scrupulous, but I cannot do it, not even close, and it frankly disturbs me deeply to witness people who do it routinely, unaffected. She knows that every viewer knows that the FBI reopening their criminal investigation into her is either bad news, very bad news, or really fucking bad news for Hillary, but Dana finds it easy to go on and on all night in this manner: "" Gosh, we have no precedent for this, so we don't know what it means. No one knows what this means. We don't know what evidence they have, they won't say, so we can't say what this is, what's going on, or what it might mean. Maybe it doesn't mean anything. So long as they wont tell us what they have, no one can say what this means. Maybe what they have is emails not written by Hillary. That would mean she has nothing to do with any of this, right? Maybe. No one knows. So, maybe."" Personally, I think it means certain people have come to understand they will not be able to prop her up for four years (especially given the leaks that are coming,) and that their cheats cannot overcome the Trump vote anyway, so Hillary is being taken out. She'll be indicted in the next few days and padoned after the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Huma Abedin is not riding Broom Stick One today (Hillary’s flying machine). I suppose Huma needs to be available for questioning about the destruction of evidence, the misuse of government property, lying under oath, and criminal racketeering through the Clinton Foundation. Now, the FBI may also find deals with Hillary to pardon Huma’s estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, if Old Hickory is elected. Someone on Fox was joking that maybe Mama can take little Donald’s electronic devises away so he won’t be texting and tweeting into the late hours, and thereby ruining the best October surprise ever. I think Trump is staying on message as he speaks now in Golden, Colorado. Some notes from what he is saying? The FBI, repealing Obamacare, and corruption are some of his topics. Justice at last can finally be enacted. National security was at risk and she covered up her crimes. Bleach and delete. 33,000 emails destroyed after she gets a Congressional subpoena. The government was a scheme for personal, criminal profit, even aid to Haiti. The Haitians hate the Clintons. There is a Hillary for publication and there is a private Hillary who promises graft for her donors. Wikileak’s new releases show The DOJ was used to protect Hillary. Loretta Lynch was offered a continuance of her job if she protects the Clintons. Anthony Weiner is a major sleaze but some of those deleted 33,000 lost emails have been discovered on his devices. Trump hopes the Gmen have not given Huma immunity. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 We haven't heard from Alex in awhile. So let's hear from Alex. My favorite part was a word he said during a throwaway comment: Clintonistas. 5 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: I am always amazed by people who can tell whoppers without laughing. Maybe my sense of humor is too strong or my conscience too scrupulous, but I cannot do it, not even close, and it frankly disturbs me deeply to witness people who do it routinely, unaffected. Jon, I have a visceral thing with this, too. When I see too many of these people in a row, my anxiety level goes through the roof. I keep thinking, but these are grown adults... If I dwell on them too much, I get really pissed. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 http://www.tothepointnews.com/2016/10/why-democrats-do-not-believe-in-democracy/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 If you discount Jimmy Dore's fear of Trump, everything he says here is spot on, including his discussion of Iran (albeit, I see the religion as a propaganda tool the theocrats use). Jimmy Dore speaks for Bernie's people. It looks like he's not voting for Hillary Clinton... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Podesta No. 23: RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 23 #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails23 #HillaryClinton https://t.co/wzxeh70oUm pic.twitter.com/tqBxe8CoY0— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 30, 2016 Death by a thousand cuts. And, according to the rumors, this is just the softening up stuff. There are supposedly electoral death blows for Clinton waiting in the wings. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 btw - This is how that SOB Podesta proposed to take scare whistleblowers into submission: make a harsh example of someone, "whether or not we have any real basis for it." Podesta: "I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it." https://t.co/MZ2a9gk5t3 pic.twitter.com/qQ9tO2aimY— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 30, 2016 Bah! Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 4 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: There are supposedly electoral death blows for Clinton waiting in the wings. Like this: We commence phase 3 of our US election coverage next week. You can contribute: https://t.co/MsNZhrTzTL @WLTaskForce pic.twitter.com/XferJnMGux— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 30, 2016 Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now