Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 7, 2007 Share Posted May 7, 2007 For the record:1. I did not state that the opening post of this thread about Peikoff's work was outright plagiary. But I did say three things: (1) that it was borderline, meaning some people would see it that way and others would not, (2) that I personally fixed the initial negligence in crediting OPAR within the body of the post, and (3) that the research method used (copy/pasting text and changing words in the middle) was a horrible method. All three statements are true and this can be verified here.2. On OL, we have been through this mess before and the implications of the previous statement have not borne the fruit that was promised.3. No more defense of plagiary will be permitted on OL.4. I take sole responsibility for letting this go on so long. I could have and should have stopped it sooner. I extend my apology to OL members. It will not happen again.Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now