Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I received this offline. I didn't have time to mess with it, but now I do. Cartoon for @TheHillTimes @HillTimesGlobal #Trudeau #trump #trade #syria #NorthKorea pic.twitter.com/jj8tV8G3me— Michael de Adder (@deAdder) April 26, 2017 It worked out OK that I delayed, but oddly enough, now that NAFTA will be renegotiated at the request of the leaders of Mexico and Canada, the cartoon kinda lost its edge. What's missing, I wonder? Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 There is no reason to lump Canada’s PM with those two guys and it is in disturbingly bad taste . . . and thought. Trudeau is a decent sort and the other two are monsters. It’s like the left putting Hitler, Stalin, and President Trump in the same photo as co-evil. Not worthy of the wonderful land of O’. I think Annie Oakley Coulter should have showed up at Berkley just for laughs and to make a point. “Hey, you dipshits, I’m here to enroll in AgriScience!” Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 How much time and energy will America retain if we don’t support bogus climate change? It is worth the aggravation. Darn, I miss Hawaiian weather. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jts Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 59 minutes ago, Peter said: There is no reason to lump Canada’s PM with those two guys and it is in disturbingly bad taste . . . and thought. Trudeau is a decent sort and the other two are monsters. It’s like the left putting Hitler, Stalin, and President Trump in the same photo as co-evil. Not worthy of the wonderful land of O’. Canada's prime minister Justin Trudeau is evil. He wants to eventually make telling the truth about Islam illegal. It starts with something that seems harmless and has little meaning, M 103, not yet a law. If not stopped it will evolve into a law. Ex Muslims warn about this. They know how it starts and how it ends. Canada is going the way of Germany. When we lose freedom of speech, it is near the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 8 hours ago, jts said: When we lose freedom of speech, it is near the end. Not if Canada is next to the United States. --Brant stupidity has its limits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 10 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said: Not if Canada is next to the United States. --Brant stupidity has its limits All a Canadian need do is step south of the 48 th parallel. Then he is free to speak or write. It is Good to have the First Amendment to our Constitution. Being able to speak, write and associate peacefully is more important than having the right to keep and bear small calibre fire-arms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 13 hours ago, BaalChatzaf said: All a Canadian need do is step south of the 48 th parallel. Then he is free to speak or write. It is Good to have the First Amendment to our Constitution. Being able to speak, write and associate peacefully is more important than having the right to keep and bear small calibre fire-arms. You don't have that "right" in New Jersey. One of the reasons I moved out. You are comfortable there. BTW, what are "small calibre fire-arms"? And large "calibre"? You think I don't know you are dumping on rights? There's a reason you hardly ever mention them: morality is the basis of rights as in morally right actions. --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Brant asked, “BTW, what are "small caliber fire-arms"? And large "caliber"? end quote and spell checked to eliminate Brit spelling. Small: 410 shotgun. Large: 12 gauge and I once handled a 10 gauge which I believe may only be used by law enforcement so maybe I dreamed that. What a kick. Hand gun. Ladies dainty. Then you go to 38 and the Dirty Hairy 357 magnum. And it the military they use a 45. You really need to have a grip on the 45. It rides up. Small rifle: 22. Large: it depends on the size of the deer or elephant. I would go with the 30 ought 6 because it personifies fire power. If you shoot targets with it don’t forget the noise cancelling headphones or you will be deef and dump for a day. Military? I have a personal fondness for the M14. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Peter, you weren't asked the question and stripped it of its context and value. So, Bob, what are they? --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 9 hours ago, Brant Gaede said: You don't have that "right" in New Jersey. One of the reasons I moved out. You are comfortable there. BTW, what are "small calibre fire-arms"? And large "calibre"? You think I don't know you are dumping on rights? There's a reason you hardly ever mention them: morality is the basis of rights as in morally right actions. --Brant No 105 recoilless for ordinary people. Also no Howitzers, long cannon, bazookas and flame throwers. No tanks, no armed aircraft, no bombs and no weapons of mass destruction for private citizens. The right to keep and bear arms extends primarily to the kind of arms the Founders had. You have a legal right to keep a small caliber < 50 cal weapons that can be aimed and be used primarily for personal defense. Heavy weapons of military grade are not included (by the Courts) in the scope of the second amendment. So for the "gun nuts" the kind of weapons the military use are not included in the scope of the second Amendment. Hear me "gun nuts" Your weapons are not sufficient to overthrow the government. A revolution can be ended in ten minutes by a squadron of Warthogs firing electrically operated Gattling Guns that shoot depleted uranium slugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 hour ago, BaalChatzaf said: No 105 recoilless for ordinary people. Also no Howitzers, long cannon, bazookas and flame throwers. No tanks, no armed aircraft, no bombs and no weapons of mass destruction for private citizens. The right to keep and bear arms extends primarily to the kind of arms the Founders had. You have a legal right to keep a small caliber < 50 cal weapons that can be aimed and be used primarily for personal defense. Heavy weapons of military grade are not included (by the Courts) in the scope of the second amendment. So for the "gun nuts" the kind of weapons the military use are not included in the scope of the second Amendment. Hear me "gun nuts" Your weapons are not sufficient to overthrow the government. A revolution can be ended in ten minutes by a squadron of Warthogs firing electrically operated Gattling Guns that shoot depleted uranium slugs. You might be wrong about flame throwers. The right to bear arms referred to the biggest stuff they could get their hands on back in those days. Logically that should still obtain. That right to bear arms is not any primary right, however, but derivative from the right to self defense. You are completely wrong if you think the founders were thinking small caliber/large caliber. They were thinking large caliber. Today they'd think differently seeing all the shit that's around. The citizenry can't stand up to the military. Getting the military used against the citizens is what's hard to do. Eisenhower did it at Little Rock, but no shots were fired. --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 8 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said: You might be wrong about flame throwers. The right to bear arms referred to the biggest stuff they could get their hands on back in those days. Logically that should still obtain. That right to bear arms is not any primary right, however, but derivative from the right to self defense. You are completely wrong if you think the founders were thinking small caliber/large caliber. They were thinking large caliber. Today they'd think differently seeing all the shit that's around. The citizenry can't stand up to the military. Getting the military used against the citizens is what's hard to do. Eisenhower did it at Little Rock, but no shots were fired. --Brant Eisenhower was enforcing a Supreme Court decision. The 14 th amendment extended the reach of the Bill of Rights to the States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Ba’al wrote: A revolution can be ended in ten minutes by a squadron of Warthogs firing electrically operated Gattling Guns that shoot depleted uranium slugs. An early machine gun with multiple barrels firing in rotation is called a Gatling Gun with only one ‘T.’ Godzilla with a ten foot thick, armored exoskeleton makes sense, but something that gets my goat, are monster movies like King Kong where bullets penetrate his hide but it just ticks him off. Anyone care to explain what would really happen to a very large mammal if shot with a 50 caliber machine gun bullets hundreds of times? Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Has anybody noticed that this thread is called "Trump Humor"? Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 8 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Has anybody noticed that this thread is called "Trump Humor"? Michael That's what you get for posting that unfunny cartoon. Take some responsibility. --Brant verbal justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1 hour ago, Brant Gaede said: That's what you get for posting that unfunny cartoon. Take some responsibility. Brant, All right, all right. Here's a different one I found bopping around the Interwebs. Not super-funny, but cute. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 It's funny seeing you trying to climb out of that hole. --Brant keep clawing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 10 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Brant, All right, all right. Here's a different one I found bopping around the Interwebs. Not super-funny, but cute. Michael The left wing Progressive Pinko-Stinko Commie Loving America Hating Liberals are having an existential crisis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 This isn't exactly about President Trump, but it does show how he left the Democratic Party in shambles. They can't even keep the damn flag in place on national TV. Note, Jimmy Dore is a hardcore progressive, so this is not the right-wing bashing the left. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 30 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: This isn't exactly about President Trump, but it does show how he left the Democratic Party in shambles. They can't even keep the damn flag in place on national TV. Note, Jimmy Dore is a hardcore progressive, so this is not the right-wing bashing the left. Michael A very amusing accident. I laughed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 Now that Donald Trump is President Trump and is doing his thing the way he is supposed to (despite people still getting it wrong), I saw a meme today and, remembering everything on OL that flared up about Trump, a poignant throb swelled in my heart: Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 58 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Now that Donald Trump is President Trump and is doing his thing the way he is supposed to (despite people still getting it wrong), I saw a meme today and, remembering everything on OL that flared up about Trump, a poignant throb swelled in my heart: Michael I hope Trump's "thing" is wrecking the government, or at least wrecking the Democrats. That is why I voted for him.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted May 7, 2017 Share Posted May 7, 2017 How many Macron's are in an inch? The new French Prez's wife looks like a blond Jane Fonda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 President Trump just fired Comey and I just saw this: Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 This is anti-Trump, but it's just too cute to pass up. LOL... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now