atlashead

You may have asked yourself "What is the root of all good?". You may have found the correct answer to that question. I have. I also know what it is within the human anti-soul that moves them. Three years ago I vowed never to use what I could not create. I chose to be agnostic on the matter, and accepted that that I had not done could not be done-not that I couldn't do it, but only that I must act on the premise I could not do it if I had not. I'll cut to the chase and my proof: human anti-souls want prime movers to be their sex slaves in order to own the fountain of youth. If they own the prime mover, they will own their and everyone else's children. Children do have minds-I had a mind, every prime mover who ever lived had a mind in their childhood. So, I have made the assertion this is what they want, and I will now tell you how I know: I chose not to take the bridge off of Manhattan. I chose not to take a train. I was not an engineer or builder, so I chose to swim. The police got in my way so I complied and got on their boat. They brought me to a hospital under a mental health law-they claimed I was not allowed to leave. In the elevator to the floor they decided to bring me was a man and a woman. When the doors closed, the man said he was going to set a bomb off in the elevator shaft when he pressed a certain button. Then he pressed it. They brought me to the wrong floor. I was then brought back into the elevator with them and the man said "It is funny to make people do things they don't want to do-we should force people to pay us to not kill them so they have to have sex with people they don't want to have sex with." This man and woman then said they were a whore and her pimp. They were both government employees.

From the Mountain, from the top of the Galt Building, they looked at each other and in their minds they kissed?

I'll start this off by saying I wanted to go to a bar tonight but instead I'm going to stay home and try and be a creator. So now to the topic. What is, to you, inspiration?

A=A

The idea is to remove the higg's particle from an electron or something, then trap it in a torus or wire. I wish I had physic in my heart, but it is another calling that calls my name. It just breaks my heart I may never see the stars...

WHEN FREE MARKETS DO NOT EXIST, WHEN FREEDOM DOES NOT EXIST-SEX IN ANY FORM IS SIN. I WILL EXPLAIN: EACH BEING HAS CONSCIOUSNESS, WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU CREATE 2 FROM 1 SEXUAL ACT?

When Political systems are formed, they should be formed on the basis of mutual gain. When Roark says "the creator creates", the creator replies, "here is your $, creators". The inventor of currency is due a piece of the pie BECAUSE they invented cooperation; the destroyer and opposite creation philosophy of altruism.

During Roark's speech, he would not say, and "a man who is in this room but doesn't want to be named" or whatever; he would say "a man who is in this room and might not even know it." I must leave this forum for good.

I'm going to change the subject: Justice is destroying someone who has violated you so they cannot violate another innocent.

Dagny was taxed and enslaved by the government, he was on a government paycheck. Dagny was the last prime mover paying taxes, I don't think it says whether Dagny believes in military force, but I doubt she even gave her consent-the government, in effect, if I'm correct, raped her financially.

Yes, teenage Francisco was obligated to Dagney; but that was his second wrong, his first: he violated the principle of physical force against Dagny. She owned him. The second is that he chose his life purpose based on "electrical engineers". He said he would sell to them; did he consider that they may not want to buy his products?

Dagny was in the right killing the soldier.

It's my conviction that, if a man engages with sexual intercourse with a woman, he need support her, in any way she desires, until he knows she is not pregnant. Edit: One must never give up their opinions or their desires. Sometimes they will conflict. Remember that sexual attraction is solely based on a person's character; if Dominique Francon was a burn victim she would still be among the most desirable woman on earth. This is the great egoism & egotism (in the opposite order). Reach out, grasp it, it is your's.

I just thought of Rearden saying to Dagny "You'll give him what you've never given me.", and it broke something that had been making me nauseous.

I'm going to take notes and transcribe them here. They will make sense if you have the same amount of knowledge as I. 36 hours till.

I read to the first idea. I went to a bar last night, I ACCOMPLISHED something. I did the hardest thing and tended to a can in a fire-you know what I have? a can that is different from others.

I'll come back and edit this post after reading all the posts int. Although I stand by my original post I'm a hypocrite. It occurred to me, if you desire a certain individual, it is because they have value, a person who has value can either act as a destroyer or a creator. Sex shows who a person really is. The following is mystical: you can show someone to live by how you have sex-perhaps infusing them with confidence forever. Is it possible that a prime mover can do what Roark does for the child in the first section of "Howard Roark" in "The Fountainhead", by selectively having sex? Neverless, I view sex as evil out of love. To make it less evil-you must rationally cover all the bases: make sure there is birth control involved. You must be ready to, at that moment, be a parent, though you must verbalize that you don't want to & why you don't. Don't accept my moral commandments unless they are correct for you.

If a vaccummated-retractible-rotary-centrifuge was made, potentially sub-visible particles could be moved from the center of the centrifuge. Then, light could be shined across this ultra-vaccummated center to see if there were sub-visible particles that were interacting with light, slowing it down. If this works, the c barrier will be broken. The consequences: super-c light could be shone at other super-c light, or other matter, to see if this super-c speed overcomes repulsive forces in photons/matter. I've no background in particle physics so I can't tell you what is light-repulsive matter, but if the c-barrier is broken, perhaps there is a chance to make exotic matter from conglomerates of said photons/matter. Hopefully, this can be done, and if photons can be made to bind, hopefully the discoverer can call them "photo-loves".

No, not at all.

this is important: If John Galt were asked "do you think it is possible to love too much? That it can harm the one that loves?" he would answer: "What do you think it was that made all of this possible-the motors, the skyscrapers, the airplanes, the telephones, the metaphysics, epistemology, the music, the artwork..."he would go on to list every single achievement of mankind"?It was love."

I'm politically AnCap, objectivist, and benevolent world premise. I'm clinging to my benevolent premise

When I turned 5 I wanted to be an *********. I had never read *** ************. I'm 25 now. I'm making this post because I'm about to give up; there have been no great innovations in our time, no great works of imagination. We have the internet, which has supplied the leeches with a never-ending fountain of history from which to snatch and/or consume. If I make it through this day, I pray that **** **** destroys man and that he never comes for me.

It's up to each individual to know their own truth, which truth objectively exists; I feel I have the need to be multiple things firsthand: an engineer, a physicist, a biologist, and an artist. I think they are roles that an individual has to play to be healthy psychologically. In truth I'm making this post because I felt the desire to share how much I love engineering & science, and in the moment before posting, reflecting, I am sure that for the short term-specialization may be ok.

I read something like "Men's sexuality-dictated by nature. Women's-dictated by man.", supposedly by Rand. I read an analysis which I found to be totally incorrect. It said that women's PURPOSE is defined by man. This is not what Rand meant, I contend. It is the WOMAN who carries a child. Thus, in any toxic relationship, only the woman can totally control whether a baby is born. Thus, a relationship between any man and a woman can be moral, as long as a child is not created. A relationship between a man and a woman where the child is born into slavery is immoral. A relationship between two who are capable of not hurting the child, and the child's not born into compulsion, is a moral one. Thus, it is WOMEN, by nature, who can use sex as a weapon, but men cannot use sex as a weapon, because it is immoral to an unborn child; which objectivists believe to be potentially good in all cases, because objectivists do not believe that one's parentage=a person. There are other points to be made, but they are not in concretes.

OP is internet slang for Original Post or Original Poster I meant original post