Jon Letendre Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 On 11/10/2018 at 4:02 PM, Ellen Stuttle said: Jon, I thought that what you meant in describing "the cabal" as being "in control" was that they're running world events, not simply that behind-the-scenes leaders use blackmail to keep members in line. Am I wrong in thinking that you're getting your views from a source that subscribes to the "Illuminati" theory of a long-lineaged secret cadre of rich and powerful families who for many generations have been conspiring to shape world events to their advantage? Ellen I’m not sure what distinction you make in your first paragraph. I am saying the real leaders of The Gang are many and United, that they use blackmail and mind control and more to direct the activities of members and exert worldwide influence and control. The CIA has posted a Fritz Springmeier work in PDF format. That doesn’t mean they endorse it, but they post some things and not others and they’ve posted his book. https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95AEDE7B8A49624_Springmeier.-.Bloodlines.of.the.Illuminati.R.pdf What I am calling The Gang includes but is much more than just the bloodline families. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellen Stuttle Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 14 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: I’m not sure what distinction you make in your first paragraph. I am saying the real leaders of The Gang are many and United, that they use blackmail and mind control and more to direct the activities of members and exert worldwide influence and control. Don't you see a difference between keeping group members in line with blackmail and controlling, for instance, whether or not the North Korean government resorts to using nuclear weaponry? Also, a difference between affecting what happens and running the show? Even on the level of keeping group members obedient with blackmail, there's no guarantee of compliance. Plus, the greater the number of people in a group, the smaller the chances of unanimity. There are just too many factors for there to be a central control on the scale you appear to be saying exists. Anyway, I don't want to be arguing with you about who is or isn't a Gang member and to what extent the Gang runs world affairs. My concern is with a small group of people who are not Gang members, who include a couple brilliant biochemists in their number, and who are developing ingenious biological methods of thinning out the globe's human population. A few things you said sparked my curiosity as to whether or not your sources are aware of the schemes I mean. Doesn't sound as if they are. Ellen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 My exiting congressman has a potent piece in the WSJ on Trump-hater and eternal betrayer McCain. https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-lost-the-house-john-mccain-1541968422?mod=e2two Who Lost The House? John McCain His July 2017 vote killed ObamaCare repeal and made Democratic lies impossible to refute. By Jason Lewis Nov. 11, 2018 3:33 p.m. ET The Republican Party lost its House majority on July 28, 2017, when Sen. John McCain ended the party’s seven-year quest to repeal ObamaCare. House leadership had done an admirable job herding cats. On the second try, we passed the American Health Care Act in May. Then McCain’s inscrutable vote against the Senate’s “skinny repeal” killed the reform effort... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Does this sound like dialogue from “Game of Thrones?” We shall retake the House Jonathan. I was just looking at an internet snip of Wolf Blitzer on “Jeopardy,” and he is considered the worst contestant ever. He is stupid and he was terrible on the show. Wrong answer after wrong answer didn’t stop him from being the first to ring in. He ended up thousands of dollars in the red, angrily glaring at Alex. I wonder if Alex told him what an ass he was, during the break. Hail to the chief. It’s semi-official. He does have wide coattails. The cowboy in the white hat gets reelected in 2020 and receives a majority in both houses of the legislature! From Rasmussen: With the midterm election in the books, voters are shifting their attention to the presidential election in 2020 and are growing more convinced that there’s a second term in sight for the 45th president. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey conducted the day after Election Day finds that 47% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it’s likely Trump will be reelected in 2020, up eight points from August. Twenty-nine percent (29%) think it’s more likely that the president will be defeated by the Democratic nominee in 2020, while another 16% feel Trump will be impeached before finishing a full term in the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 16 minutes ago, Peter said: Hail to the chief. It’s semi-official. He does have wide coattails. The cowboy in the white hat gets reelected in 2020 and receives a majority in both houses of the legislature! Congress could have done better for themselves if they had fought harder. Example: I think that Jason Lewis would've had a much better chance of keeping his seat if he had been as aggressive and forthright while campaigning as he was is the WSJ article above. It's so unfortunate that he saved this kind of coherence and fighting spirit until after the election. J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 10 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said: Don't you see a difference between keeping group members in line with blackmail and controlling, for instance, whether or not the North Korean government resorts to using nuclear weaponry? Also, a difference between affecting what happens and running the show? Even on the level of keeping group members obedient with blackmail, there's no guarantee of compliance. Plus, the greater the number of people in a group, the smaller the chances of unanimity. There are just too many factors for there to be a central control on the scale you appear to be saying exists. Anyway, I don't want to be arguing with you about who is or isn't a Gang member and to what extent the Gang runs world affairs. My concern is with a small group of people who are not Gang members, who include a couple brilliant biochemists in their number, and who are developing ingenious biological methods of thinning out the globe's human population. A few things you said sparked my curiosity as to whether or not your sources are aware of the schemes I mean. Doesn't sound as if they are. Ellen [my bold] That sounds intriguing. Who/where are they and what are they developing? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Q posts: https://qmap.pub/ Q post #2491: Q!!mG7VJxZNCI12 Nov 2018 - 9:13:00 PM #1 attacked person by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]? POTUS #2 attacked entity by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]? Q As of 3:02 pm est today, "Qanon" is now the #2 most attacked entity behind POTUS within the U.S. [R+D COORDINATED BLITZ ATTACK] Logical Thinking > WHY? WHY WOULD THE BIGGEST MEDIA CO'S IN THE WORLD CONTINUE TO ATTACK THIS MOVEMENT? 2+2=4 Congratulations, Anons! YOU ARE NOW THE SECOND BIGGEST THREAT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT. BADGE OF HONOR! SOMETHING BIG IS ABOUT TO DROP. Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellen Stuttle Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: [my bold] That sounds intriguing. Who/where are they and what are they developing? It is intriguing. I've been fairly obsessed for about a year with thinking about details. I find microbiology fascinating. I wouldn't be wise, however, to talk about details. The schemers are ruthless, and there are search engines. I don't want to draw attention to myself - or to OL. I've been trying to choose wording carefully, but I think I'd best just stop talking. I hadn't been reading OL at all for somewhat over eleven months. I blipped in since I was curious to see what was being said here about the mid-term elections, especially by Michael, who I think has been very astute in matters Trump. Then I got curious about some things you were saying.... Talking can get a person in trouble. I'll just say that the methods don't involve contagious diseases, which could get out of hand. Things which interfere with reproductive and other bodily processes. Ellen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 12 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said: It is intriguing. I've been fairly obsessed for about a year with thinking about details. I find microbiology fascinating. I wouldn't be wise, however, to talk about details. The schemers are ruthless, and there are search engines. I don't want to draw attention to myself - or to OL. I've been trying to choose wording carefully, but I think I'd best just stop talking. I hadn't been reading OL at all for somewhat over eleven months. I blipped in since I was curious to see what was being said here about the mid-term elections, especially by Michael, who I think has been very astute in matters Trump. Then I got curious about some things you were saying.... Talking can get a person in trouble. I'll just say that the methods don't involve contagious diseases, which could get out of hand. Things which interfere with reproductive and other bodily processes. Ellen I have no doubt that such things are being done to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: Q posts: https://qmap.pub/ Q post #2491: Q!!mG7VJxZNCI12 Nov 2018 - 9:13:00 PM #1 attacked person by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]? POTUS #2 attacked entity by FAKE NEWS [+swamp [R+D]]? Q As of 3:02 pm est today, "Qanon" is now the #2 most attacked entity behind POTUS within the U.S. [R+D COORDINATED BLITZ ATTACK] Logical Thinking > WHY? WHY WOULD THE BIGGEST MEDIA CO'S IN THE WORLD CONTINUE TO ATTACK THIS MOVEMENT? 2+2=4 Congratulations, Anons! YOU ARE NOW THE SECOND BIGGEST THREAT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT. BADGE OF HONOR! SOMETHING BIG IS ABOUT TO DROP. Q What an incredible moment in our history. 2020 ..... All 50 States , Reagan only got 49. Wonder how 2024 goes , Ivanka ? Would it be Constitutionally allowed to change the two term limit and let Trump get the third term ? Assuming he wants it , but I mean RBG is still on the bench at 85 so what would Trump be in 6 years ? 78 ? Maybe Q would run ? Who is John Galt ? Who is Q ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 I started re-watching the first few episodes of "Person of Interest." Intriguing show. A computer has access to all communications including street cameras and then predicts where a crime or accident will occur next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Gotta love Ann: For some reason, there seems to be a diminution in tweets from Michael Avenatti today about what a moral reprobate Donald Trump is. — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) November 15, 2018 (For those who don't know, see here.) Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Two Daily Caller writers got an exclusive interview with President Trump, and posted excerpts from it yesterday. Today the full transcript has been published: Full Transcript Of Trump’s Oval Office Interview With The Daily Caller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 3 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Gotta love Ann: (For those who don't know, see here.) Michael I'm assuming that the left is temporarily back to fully selectively supporting presumption of innocence again, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, Jonathan said: I'm assuming that the left is temporarily back to fully selectively supporting presumption of innocence again, correct? Of course! It’s the very foundation of civil rights and freedom. And they were always for it, never wavered, and simply will not recall what the heck you’re talking about otherwise. Or, there’s always creative re-writing: what they did before, that you’re thinking of, was just the contextually-mandated method of supporting presumption of innocence in that unique case. Fascist Kavanaugh accused a woman of lying, and she had the presumption of innocence. Fascist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 4:57 PM, Ellen Stuttle said: It is intriguing. I've been fairly obsessed for about a year with thinking about details. I find microbiology fascinating. I wouldn't be wise, however, to talk about details. The schemers are ruthless, and there are search engines. I don't want to draw attention to myself - or to OL. I've been trying to choose wording carefully, but I think I'd best just stop talking. I hadn't been reading OL at all for somewhat over eleven months. I blipped in since I was curious to see what was being said here about the mid-term elections, especially by Michael, who I think has been very astute in matters Trump. Then I got curious about some things you were saying.... Talking can get a person in trouble. I'll just say that the methods don't involve contagious diseases, which could get out of hand. Things which interfere with reproductive and other bodily processes. Ellen I am seeing some mentions of modified bacteriophages being slipped into us in vaccination shots. They’re said to insert new DNA into host testicle and ovary cells without killing them and ensuring subsequent generations carry the traits contained in the genetic code inserted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 http://www.social-consciousness.com/2017/07/putin-west-controlled-by-satanic-pedophiles.html “Prior to his recent meeting with Donald Trump at this years G20 Summit, Putin issued a warning that if he didn't expose the Elite pedophile networks, then he would "begin naming names". ... ”Mr. Putin's position on the matter of child-abusing Elites remains the same, saying: "Europe and the West thrives on a culture of pedophilia and Satanism" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Jon Letendre said: Fascist. It's a fair cop. I done it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 And the American tax payer is paying for it. Obama set up a huge fund for all the Soros social justice domestic terrorism. Taxpayer dollars are funding all of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 ABC News reports an unusually high number of sealed criminal indictments have been added to the federal court docket in Washington, D.C. since the start of 2018. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 Eric Swalwell wants to ban semi-automatic weapons. His big idea to make it happen? He’ll use Big Government to offer owners $1,000 each to turn ’em in—or face criminal prosecution. Government is force. That’s right up the petty tyrant Swalwell’s alley. However, many Americans see the 2nd Amendment as a last resort means to protect themselves from an out of control, tyrannical government bent on stripping us of our constitutional rights. When Joe Biggs heard of Swalwell’s plan, he tweeted this: “So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your fucking mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.” Swalwell responded with a tweet of his own: “And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.” Swalwell later said he was being sarcastic, but his mindset was revealed. He’s a lefty who worships his Big Government. He’s a part of that government, therefore his nukes are legit. Our guns aren’t legit to him because he will pass some law that cancels out the Second Amendment. That’s not how it works, Swalwell. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR ILK. Swalwell and Ocasio-Cortez are callow and ignorant. They see government as a shiny and powerful new toy. It’s magical to them! They want to use their toy to usher in a socialist utopia. Is it costly? Of course—but money is no object—they’ll get it by raising taxes, thus enslaving their victims, er, citizens even more. On Bill Maher’s show, the 38 year-old Swalwell said he might consider running for president in 2020. Maher, the limousine liberal, gushed. Maher prides himself on being a ’smart’ atheist, but he’s very religious when it comes to Big Government. He worships it. Swalwell’s nanny state vision emphasizes ’safety’ and ’the children’ as reasons to take away our gun rights. They will force citizens to submit or be jailed. If they resist, his Big Government can lawfully murder them. If you think I’m engaging in hyperbole, consider what happened to the men, women and children at the Branch Davidians Compound at Waco. They were massacred. Big Government doesn’t care about the children–only their power. Swalwell is a dangerous fool and there will be no ‘common ground’ if he insists on grabbing our guns. Many of us are drawing a line in that ground. THE 2ND AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! —Ben Garrison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now