Jon Letendre Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 They want to talk about me, instead of the subject, Q. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Jon Letendre said: I would discuss, I would respond to serious discussion, but they are unwilling and incapable. Open a discussion that doesn't name-call and rest on false premises about those skeptical of the Qanon phenomena being a real insider at 1600 or the EOB. Impress the silent readers with your rationality. Answer some of the most common critiques of the Qanon phenomea. Don't personalize discussion -- confront and attack arguments, not people. Don't act like you consumed bath-salts and need to tear down other people with teeth and claw. Your fierceness may seem like fits of uncontrolled rage to a neutral observer. You would likely agree that it is possible to make a case for Qanon without shitting on people as people. Here is the key: your behaviour is the only thing we really have to estimate your mental health (but we are not psychologists). If a person flies into a rage over anodyne disagreements, that is a problem of the rager, and hopefully one he or she recognizes and brings under rational volitional control. Otherwise, angry and personally-directed vituperation gets in the way of 'Serious Discussion.' If you want to re-establish good faith, then maybe start with a Jon Letendre piece on Qanon. Fill in the lurking readers who are without a settled opinion. Show a 'steel man' version of Qanon critiques and doubts. Respond to the critiques and doubts that you find reasonable or at least worthy of examination. That would show you both willing and capable of reasonably-productive disagreement. And no, I would not publicly say you need medication. That is cruel and hurtful and as ad hominem as it gets. Lots of men confront their triggers and provocations without having to be medicated. Edited June 29, 2018 by william.scherk Grrrrrrrammar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 I just made five such posts. They won’t be discussed because you all don’t want Q discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 You are of course right Bill, I withdraw the meds insult, sorry Jon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 https://qanon.pub/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted June 29, 2018 Share Posted June 29, 2018 I stopped paying attention to Q awhile back when it started going loopy and pro-establishment. I figured it has either been infiltrated (I mean, it was coming out on 4chan) or too many people started copycatting. The early QAnon was spot on. Since I stopped, I haven't looked again, not even at Jerome Corsi, who always references Q. Even till today (I subscribe to a feed of his.) But it is interesting to see President Trump outlining the letter Q in his speeches. He never did that before. And Jerome Corsi's book went mainstream bestseller. That never happened before, either. Maybe it's time to look again. As for mockery, people already know I'm a conspiracy theorist, so I don't give a shit. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 5 hours ago, william.scherk said: Edit: the earlier-posted video has disappeared from Jordan Sather's channel. No real evidence why. I was intrigued by a part of the video, so I excerpted it and will post it after I get my instructions from Faye and The Deep. So, yet another look at the day's surprising and compelling Qanon posts. What exactly makes Jordan's interpretations better than Michael's, Jon's, Jonathan's, Caroljane's, or mine? Or worse than any of our impressions and explanations ... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 https://twitter.com/prayingmedic I am very much not up to the task of interpreting Q, and neither is Praying Medic and neither is any other one person. I don’t have any grasp of the military, intelligence or int’l relations jargon and history he often uses and refers to. A lot of it I think is intended for individual consumers, vets, agents, retired agents, CEOs, traitors like John Skull and Bones Kerry, etc. I have read Praying Medic’s Tweets for a few months. He humbly acknowledges for himself many of the limitations I have. He does a good job of presenting Q and the connections the community make. (You don’t have to “have Twitter.” The above link only displays all his content in order. You can’t respond or retweet, you won’t be on Twitter or using Twitter.) 1) This is my #Qanon thread for June 28, 2018 Q posts can be found here: (link: https://qanon.pub/) qanon.pub My theme for this thread: "Power to the People." 8:04 PM · Jun 28, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: They want to talk about me, instead of the subject, Q. I have to take issue here, because you at least twice decided to talk about me instead of the subject at issue, and your personal comments were grossly wrongful. The issue was not Q, about which I know nothing and care nothing. But your comments were about me, and if you wish to be taken seriously by me at least here, you should retract them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 18 minutes ago, caroljane said: I have to take issue here, because you at least twice decided to talk about me instead of the subject at issue, and your personal comments were grossly wrongful. The issue was not Q, about which I know nothing and care nothing. But your comments were about me, and if you wish to be taken seriously by me at least here, you should retract them. I do not wish to be taken seriously by you. I am confident about what you are and will take a pass on retracting. I am happy to hear you care nothing about Q, I look forward to your silence on the subject of Q. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 3) It must also irritate the elites to see an anonymous troll from 8chan like #Qanon (who makes no money from his efforts) named as one of the most influential figures in society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 17) The President first made a statement about the storm on October 5th, 2017, while in the presence of military leaders and their families. https://mobile.twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1012534317791080448/video/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 24) #Qanon posted a link to an article about an investigation into Netflix and a film they've streamed that some say contains child pornography. It's no secret that the left has been trying to normalize pedophilia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 26) #Qanon asked who is on the board of Netflix? That would be Susan Rice. Netflix Names Former Obama Adviser and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to Board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 28) The left is hoping that by bombarding us with a constant stream of pro-pedophile propaganda, we'll be convinced that it's not a criminal act. (An important battle to win if you happen to be a pedophile.) #Qanon 10:43 PM · Jun 28, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 36) An anon posted a letter signed by 10 Frightened Democrats demanding that Julian Assange's asylum be revoked. Now, why would Democrats suddenly feel like Assange is a threat to them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 37) The 10 Frightened Democrats know that Assange has the goods on them. If/when he testifies about the DNC emails, the truth comes out about Seth Rich. Ditto for the server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 39) #Qanon said that after the Trump-Putin summit has concluded, the truth about #UraniumOne can be publicly revealed. (To do so before the summit would cause negative optics.) Timing is everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 https://twitter.com/prayingmedic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: I do not wish to be taken seriously by you. I am confident about what you are and will take a pass on retracting. I am happy to hear you care nothing about Q, I look forward to your silence on the subject of Q. lol you wish ! #qsucks#stop the avian order#Lets be serious here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 81) #Qanon reminded us of what happened yesterday when the House voted to force the DOJ to produce the documents they've kept from Congress for over a year. The threatened consequence for non-compliance is the removal of Rod Rosenstein. The DOJ has 6 days left to comply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 83) #Qanon said that the left is attempting to portray Trump and Q followers as violent extremists. 4chan moderators have been compromised. The mainstream media is pushing a narrative which will grow stronger. They want us to become violent in response to their tactics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 July 9. That's an important date. President Trump said that this is the day he will announce his candidate for the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy of Anthony Kennedy. His short list is five people, two of whom are women. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 (edited) 15 hours ago, william.scherk said: What exactly makes Jordan's interpretations better than Michael's, Jon's, Jonathan's, Caroljane's, or mine? Or worse than any of our impressions and explanations ... ? First, you gotta get some data, right? 13 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: https://twitter.com/prayingmedic Okay, what does Praying Medic have to say? Well, he or she has a 91-item tweetstorm. Jon Letendre has copied and pasted from the long thread. Here is the first: And here the last ... And here the summary in a video. Edited June 30, 2018 by william.scherk Tweetstorm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted June 30, 2018 Share Posted June 30, 2018 (edited) On 6/27/2018 at 9:18 AM, Jon Letendre said: Indian is eating [Harley-Davidson's] lunch. And now they imagine leaving Missouri for Asia is a smart idea. Perhaps the delusional souls hope to avoid the inevitable and permanent hit to their brand by pinning it on Republicans. They deserve the bankruptcy they have been working hard toward. Indian gets what customers remain, net economic impact = 0. Actually, some imbeciles lose control of billions of capital, net economic impact = very positive. It looks to me that H-D has both domestic and international markets. It is big in Asia and in Europe. The steel and aluminum tariff retaliation means that US-produced Harleys would be pricier than overseas-produced/assembled Harleys. A business follows its bottom line reality. So, they move production to evade the tariffs imposed by the EU. And, under the TPP, Asian markets can be served without tariffs -- if production moves closer to its markets in Asia, into a country adhering to TPP. Paraphrasing from an explainer: -- H-D cycles sold in the USA are the product of a supply-chain. The vehicles are assembled in the USA from parts coming in from all over the world. From Germany, Italy, Taiwan, Japan and Mexico. The price of parts is subject to the Trump Tariffs on metals and to the countervailing tariffs imposed by the other independent states. And about Indian eating H-D's lunch ... Quote A Minnesota-based company said on Friday that it is considering moving production of some motorcycles out of the U.S. because of European tariffs, just days after Harley-Davidson announced a similar move A spokeswoman for Polaris Industries acknowledged that the company could move some production of its Indian Motorcycle from northwest Iowa to Poland. "Nothing is definitive," Polaris spokeswoman Jess Rogers said. "We're looking at a range of mitigation plans." Edited June 30, 2018 by william.scherk Spellink errors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now