Donald Trump


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Carol,

There is plenty of evidence and it is sickening.

The mainstream media plays it down. In the places you inhabit (except here on OL, from what I gather), they not only don't talk about pedophilia, they openly mock those who do as kooks, hysterical conspiracy theorists, etc..

Without talking about the media, since there is so much fake news going on, let's go straight to the DOJ site--from June 12:

More Than 2,300 Suspected Online Child Sex Offenders Arrested During Operation “Broken Heart”

That's just the tip of the iceberg.

Michael

Thank you, Michael. The continuing denials must be motivated by something. She has also compared this issue to “whatever might happen to upset Jon.,” like hanging the paper towel roll in the wrong direction, or mismatched socks.

This isn’t the first time that plain, uncontroversial evidence has been presented on this site.

Yet, denials. So very curious.

Even moreso because, I once stated that the blonde, I can’t remeber her name, the lead abuser of NXIVM, I stated that she was accused of trafficking not just women but also children.

Carol had a researched response for me quickly. Maybe she will claim perfect ignorance of “this stuff.” If so, I won’t be buying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Letendre said:

... the blonde, I can’t remeber her name, the lead abuser of NXIVM...

Jon,

Allison Mack.

She played Chloe Sullivan in Smallville. Chloe was the best friend of Clark Kent and cousin of Lois Lane. (This character is not in the Superman comics.)

My semi-autistic stepson was a huge fan of Smallville. I don't know if he had a crush on Allison Mack since I never asked (after all, gotta respect a guy's right to privacy... :) ). But I imagine she was a heartthrob of his.

Once all this sex scandal stuff about her exploded on the news, Sean lost interest in the show. I didn't ask him if this was the reason, but I'm pretty sure he got turned off by it. Like him, like all kinds of Smallville fans all across America...

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Carol,

There is plenty of evidence and it is sickening.

The mainstream media plays it down. In the places you inhabit (except here on OL, from what I gather), they not only don't talk about pedophilia, they openly mock those who do as kooks, hysterical conspiracy theorists, etc..

Without talking about the media, since there is so much fake news going on, let's go straight to the DOJ site--from June 12:

More Than 2,300 Suspected Online Child Sex Offenders Arrested During Operation “Broken Heart”

That's just the tip of the iceberg.

Michael

The horrible evidence of the scum who abuse and exploit children(usually their own relatives) through child porn is too sadly apparent, and is irrefutable.  I was talking about evidence of the "elite" rings of pedophiles whose exposure is regularly predicted soon here- the rest of the iceberg . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme Court finally corrects this abhorrent situation, rules in favor of personal freedom.

Also, goodbye, Democrat Party.

 
 
 
 
 
Supreme Court rules in favor of non-union workers who are now, as an example, able to support a candidate of his or her choice without having those who control the Union deciding for them. Big loss for the coffers of the Democrats!
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the Harley-Davidson / President Trump feud so entertaining.

Harley is full of shit. They have been sucking wind for years, off and on for decades, really .

In 1986 a one-off tariff was placed by the Reagan admin. on Japanese bikes with motors larger than 700cc. It lasted one or two years. Exclusively to the benefit of Harley. The picture of cronyism. (My beloved ‘86 Honda VFR750F INTERCEPTOR originally had a 700cc motor. I found a 750cc one and put it in my bike.) The four Japanese manufacturers reacted in different ways. Most simply pulled their over-700cc bikes from the market. For the VFR, Honda opted for selling highly taxed 750s and also offering a tariff-free 700cc version, de-stroked with shortened crank and cylinders that retailed for like 25% less, by avoiding the tariff.

The current CEO is only since 2015, But has been in leadership roles much longer. They have a serious fundamental marketing problem, it is many years old. Don’t count on perfect precision here, but their average buyer was like 25 in the sixties, 45 in the eighties and is 65+ now. They have fucked up everything, figured out nothing, and now are scapegoating Trump. They cancel promising model lines, they play with the idea of buying Ducati from VW. They fuck around with bankers and buyouts like elitist globalist idiots because they have failed to solve their problems. Indian is eating their lunch.

And now they imagine leaving Missouri for Asia is a smart idea. Perhaps the delusional souls hope to avoid the inevitable and permanent hit to their brand by pinning it on Republicans.

They deserve the bankruptcy they have been working hard toward. Indian gets what customers remain, net economic impact = 0. Actually, some imbeciles lose control of billions of capital, net economic impact = very positive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Marc said:

I don’t call the left , left anymore . 

I consider them zealots . 

They have inconsistent beliefs , they’re liars , and the worst thing is is that they lie to themselves 

Good point. Calling them the left doesn't really get to the point of identifying who they are and what they stand for.

A better word would be "thieves." Or "force-initiators." "Busy-body control freaks." "Tyrants." The essence of their ideology is that they get moral credit and feel good about themselves for doing nothing but having an opinion and voting to forcibly take others' wealth and distribute it among themselves and those whom they falsely claim to care about (if they actually cared, they would be voluntarily giving their own time and money rather than stealing from others).

It inevitably leads to the backwards "logic" that we see in Carol here, as an example. Carol wants access to the Koch brothers' money, simply because they have it, and she wants to have a say in controlling them and their resources. They do not wish to surrender their freedom or their hard-earned money to Carol, and they resist being controlled be her and her ilk. Therefore, Carol must smear them as evil, and deserving of having their wealth confiscated. No proof needs to be presented other than that they have what she wants. No charges, no trial, no chance for them to answer the accusations. She doesn't have the slightest fucking clue who or what they really are, how much they have benefitted humanity, and she doesn't care to know. She has prejudged them as guilty, as evil, as deserving of being punished, because that's her excuse to support forcibly seizing what she wants. And that allows her to cast herself as being virtuous in supporting thievery.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, caroljane said:

The horrible evidence of the scum who abuse and exploit children(usually their own relatives) through child porn is too sadly apparent, and is irrefutable.  I was talking about evidence of the "elite" rings of pedophiles whose exposure is regularly predicted soon here- the rest of the iceberg . 

Carol,

This is a good start.

The next step will be when you stop qualifying everything little thing when you agree that pedophilia is a problem in society.

Repeat after me:

Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.
Pedophilia exists and it is evil.

Once you have a frame like that to compete with the "whoever points to pedophilia is a hysterical tin foil hat conspiracy theorist" frame, you can look at other evidence in a more critical, less propagandistic, mode.

But let this new frame settle first. This is a hard jump, I know.

:) 

(God, that sounds sanctimonious, but I don't mean it that way. You've been lied to by people who promised you paradise on earth and, just like the victim of a con, it's hard to accept that you have been conned, even when faced with irrefutable proof. So I don't feel smug. I feel empathy and a wish to make it hurt less...)

Michael

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our nation's Thieves are squawking about how cold-hearted and Hitler-like anyone must be to not immediately grant asylum to anyone and everyone crossing our borders illegally from the south. They are all said to be fleeing horrific conditions, and that the people of our nation other than the Thieves should be forced to deal with alleviating their misery.

Wouldn't it be accurate, then, to say that they are fleeing "shithole countries"?

Shouldn't we avoid importing and implementing the ideologies that caused these countries to become such massive shitholes?

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The family separation psychodrama just keeps careering from one extreme to another. Now some commie arbiter has entered a judgement:

Judge orders U.S. to reunite families separated at border within 30 days

940x940.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chief Justice Anthony Kennedy just announced he is retiring from the Supreme Court (see here).

Although generally conservative, he has sided with liberals on many cases.

Now President Trump gets to pick his successor.

I wonder if he will choose another middle-of-the-roader, I wonder, I wonder...

:evil:  :) 

OK, OK, I shouldn't gloat. But I am glad a more pro-freedom Chief Justice will be appointed. :) 

However, some President Trump supporters are gloating. For instance, this guy:

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The outrage groupies will now stop harassing the Trump staff at restaurants.

Now there's Supreme Court "social injustice" to bitch about. And they can get a lot of media attention out of that.

:) 

Also, I read that President Trump said the new appointee will come from the list of 25 he had compiled earlier. If they are anything like Chief Justice Gorsuch, President Trump will alter the direction of the Supreme Court toward freedom for--at least--the next two or three generations or more.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won the Cold War but caught the cold.(yes I miss Fred Bartlett!). Now if trump could get the schools to stop creating these entitled useless professors and institute positions on a merit/results based curriculum that would be greatttttt!

Starting with judges is a great step, overhauling the education system is the next one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jules Troy said:

Now if trump could get the schools to stop creating these entitled useless professors and institute positions on a merit/results based curriculum that would be greatttttt!

Starting with judges is a great step, overhauling the education system is the next one.  

Jules,

Give the guy a break! This is only President Trump's second year. He's working on it and will get something done that will be wonderful.

btw - Have you seen his education peeps? Let's start with this one:

Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education

It looks to me like she can do the job. Might even get teachers who can teach those little suckers about entrepreneurship (without government handouts) while she's at it.

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faye has put together a brief video explaining the federally-communist hater Bush-appointee-issued  injunction today ...

My very favourite Elf has a few words to say about Radicalization. 

 

Edited by william.scherk
Syntax error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the typo "Presidebt" Trump.

On 6/3/2018 at 10:10 AM, Peter said:

Was “Presidebt” a misspelling or a satiric comment?

dette.png

"We'll see what happens."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the judgement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jules Troy said:

I actually like Thomas Sowell ?

Jules,

I do, too.

But I won't be betting any money on Sowell's presidential predictions.

:) 

I don't even remember what article he wrote for that National Embarrassment, but, at this point, I doubt he wants it remembered as one of his finest hours...

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now