Message added by william.scherk

For a ground-floor view of the phenomena of QAnon ... including the gestation of 'Watkins-Q-kun':


Credence and interest in the QAnon phenomena  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Which choice best represents your interest in the QAnon phenomenon

    • Uninterested
      2
    • Interested, but skeptical
      1
    • I already know what I know
      0
    • None of your business. I don't declare my interests
      0
    • "Don't bother to examine a folly ... "
      0
    • I'd be interested in an objective analysis of the phenomena
      0
    • I will explain everything in a guest post here, if given the opportunity
      0

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/02/2018 at 02:32 AM

I'd like to open a field of discussion for the QAnon phenomena.  Here is where I will post in already existing material presented at OL by members.  I'll take direction from comments and from poll answers. 

  • What is Q / QAnon?
  • Why should anyone on OL pay attention?
  • Is skepticism justified?
  • What are the main questions readers have in mind to guide discussion?

No special rules or guidelines for this thread; the OL guidelines are good enough and will apply here. .  Please keep personal abuse to a minimum. Creative insults are kosher, but if they aren't on topic, why post them?

hr

Our forum leader opened discussion on the phenomena back in January of this year.  My key-word search-term was "QAnon,"  not "Q," so the search results will not necessarily return all incidence of discussion touching on the phenomena.

On 1/3/2018 at 4:10 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

[...] If you really want to go down a Rabbit Hole where anti-deep state magic happens for real, look into "QAnon."

I will post a thing about him later, probably in a new thread or on the Conspiracy Theory thread. He's been spot on accurate predicting a lot of recent happenings right before they happen. More recently he's been doing some twittering and he seems to like hamming it up a bit, so here are a few teasers:

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

:)

 

More coming...

 

640 Comments


Recommended Comments



william.scherk

Posted

I think the government furlough has had some effect on the person or persons currently posting to 8chan under cover of "Q."  The output is kind of desultory and recursive.

From QAnon.pub

q2668.png

q2669.png

q2670.png

q2671.png

q2672.png

q2673.png

q2674.png

q2675.png

 

 

william.scherk

Posted

The 8chan mystery "Q" has added more droppings. Here is a crop of a dozen. 

q2676.png

q2677.png

q2678.png

q2679.png

q2680.png

q2681.png

q2682.png

q2683.png

q2684.png

q2685.png

q2686.png

 

william.scherk

Posted (edited)

More droppings, to bring the materials almost up to date.

q2687.png

q2688.png

q2689.png

q2690.png

q2691.png

q2692.png

q2693.png

q2694.png

q2695.png

q2696.png

 

 

Edited by william.scherk
william.scherk

Posted

Final update for the day, fresh Q droppings ...

q2697.png

q2698.png

q2699.png

q2700.png

q2701.png

q2702.png

q2703.png

q2704.png

q2705.png

william.scherk

Posted (edited)

The latest Q droppings are as opaque and vague as can be. 

q2706.png

q2707.png

q2708.png

q2709.png

q2710.png

q2711.png

q2712.png

q2713.png

q2714.png

q2715.png

q2716.png

q2717.png

q2718.png

q2719.png

q2720.png

Edited by william.scherk
william.scherk

Posted

All click-and-go screen-captures are from QAnon.pub.  These droppings are fresh:

q2721.png

q2722.png

q2723.png

q2724.png

q2725.png

q2726.png

q2727.png

q2728.png

q2729.png

q2730.png

q2731.png

q2732.png

q2733.png

q2734.png

q2735.png

q2736.png

william.scherk

Posted

Jordan Sather says he was interviewed "On the Matter of Q" by a reporter/researcher at the Washington Post.  Could be an interesting article, if and when it comes out.  I expect Sather will make the entire text/recording of the half-hour interview available on his Youtube video channel.

Into the weeds!

 

william.scherk

Posted

Some more diligent Q-Watchers have concluded that QAnon has "got their groove back." Whatever that means. I am more a 'stitch in time saves nine' kind of guy.

Funny/sad/revealing/bizarre LARP (live action role-play) note from one of the primary Q-grifters on Twitter:

-- I didn't notice the mainstream media has been "brought down," but maybe FakeFace knows something we don't. It's pretty clear QAnon knows nothing.  Here's ten of the most recent.  

q2737.png

q2738.png

q2739.png

q2740.png

q2741.png

q2742.png

q2743.png

q2744.png

q2745.png

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/5218502.html#5218735

In related news, that awful website The Contemptor has made room for a weekly overview from our friend Travis View:

 

william.scherk

Posted

The entity or entity behind Q has had a burst of energy.  The drops/droppings are now up to number 2786. I'll add in the updates over the next couple of days, ten at a time.

q2747.png

q2748.png

q2749.png

q2750.png

q2751.png

q2752.png

q2753.png

q2754.png

q2755.png

q2756.png

william.scherk

Posted

The thrill of it all.  You are part of a brave crew of researchers, in the know. You are the elite!

q2757.png

q2758.png

q2759.png

q2760.png

q2761.png

q2762.png

q2763.png

q2764.png

q2765.png

q2766.png

william.scherk

Posted

"Are you a Q-believer, Sammy?"

q2767.png

q2768.png

q2769.png

q2770.png

q2771.png

q2772.png

q2773.png

q2774.png

q2775.png

q2776.png

william.scherk

Posted

"Do you believe?"

The President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, AGREED that an illegal coup was attempted against him.
Stop and understand the GRAVITY of acknowledgement.
Do you believe nothing will happen?
Do you believe no one will be prosecuted?
POTUS making statements for no reason?
How do you introduce the TRUTH to those still asleep?
DECLAS coming?
The message must be direct (bypass the non reporting of the TRUTH (facts) by FAKE ‘spin the narrative’ NEWS).

q2777.png

q2778.png

q2779.png

q2780.png

q2781.png

q2782.png

q2783.png

q2784.png

q2785.png

q2786.png

william.scherk

Posted

"Think here."  Why did Facebook fake-delete Russian-funded "new media" pages? 

Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.
A series of scenarios is currently being conducted ['game the sys'] to test response, risk, and calc results.
'Censorship' [added] layers of inserted code 'through keyword targeting' in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.
'China-Russia-Iran' 'fake' take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled *new* RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled *new* video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q

q2787.png

q2788.png

q2789.png

q2790.png

q2791.png

q2792.png

q2793.png

q2794.png

q2795.png

q2796.png

william.scherk

Posted

Uncle Q has laid out some heavy-duty homework for the 'researchers' in the community!

Pick a Network – Any Network.
Search ‘Qanon’

https://www.nbcnews.com/pages/search/?q=qanon
https://abcnews.go.com/search?searchtext=qanon
https://www.washingtonpost.com/newssearch/?datefilter=All%20Since%202005&query=qanon&sort=Relevance&utm_term=.d3e179a0682e
https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=qanon
https://www.cnn.com/search/?q=qanon
http://www.msnbc.com/search/qanon
https://www.newsweek.com/search/site/qanon
http://fortune.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.wired.com/search/?q=qanon&page=1&sort=score
https://www.theguardian.com/us (search: Qanon)
https://www.npr.org/search?query=qanon&page=1
https://www.vox.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.gq.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.pbs.org/search/?q=qanon
https://www.theverge.com/search?q=qanon
https://observer.com/?s=qanon
https://www.aljazeera.com/Search/?q=qanon
https://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=qanon
https://www.breitbart.com/search/?s=qanon#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=qanon&gsc.page=1
https://psmag.com/search?query=qanon
https://www.newyorker.com/search/q/qanon
https://www.latimes.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.seattletimes.com/search/?query=qanon&sortby=mostrecent&page=1&perpage=20
https://www.esquire.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.thesun.co.uk/?s=qanon
https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=qanon
https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Muslim-woman-fights-for-Israel-despite-death-threats-watch-581066#/search;query=qanon
https://qz.com/search/qanon/
http://nymag.com/search.html?q=qanon
https://www.politico.com/search?q=qanon
https://thehill.com/search/site/qanon
https://search.huffingtonpost.com/search?utf8p=qanon&fr=huffpost
http://time.com/search/?q=qanon
https://www.vice.com/en_us/search?q=qanon
https://www.salon.com/search/qanon
https://www.dailydot.com/?s=qanon
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/search?keyword=qanon
https://www.rollingstone.com/results/#?q=qanon
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/search?q=qanon
https://www.snopes.com/?s=qanon
https://www.buzzfeed.com/search?q=qanon
https://www.mediamatters.org/search/index?qstring=qanon
http://thefederalist.com/?s=qanon

Reconcile.

 

q2797.png

q2798.png

q2799.png

q2800.png

q2801.png

"Ma, I'm famous!"  
"Well, technically, no -- you are not famous. Few folks know who you really are."

william.scherk

Posted

One of the snarkiest of the QAnon observers is Mike Rothschild, who has penned a piece at the Daily Dot:

QAnon’s repetitive posts are alienating even his most ardent supporters.

Quote

[...]

One set of posts was a set of out-of-context pictures of a city in China, leaving followers busy to decode why they were posted.

Q has done this many other times, even using China on a few occasions. There were references to “suicide weekend” of deep state criminals taking their own lives—an event Q has predicted three other times. There were long lists of links of pieces written about QAnon and proofs that the “coincidences” between Q posts and Trump tweets are “mathematically impossible”— all of which Q does to justify his existence.

He even repeated memes he’d already used before, such as one about voter ID posted in drop 2463, then repeated in 2689. The posts are also getting sloppy, as Q corrects typos and errors that didn’t actually exist, and attributes it to being “on the move.”

The last few posts do hint at something changing, finally, promising updates to the long-ago posted “placeholders” for sealed indictments, ”activation” of sleeper agents, and hinting at James Comey and others facing “traitors justice.”

It’s likely nothing will happen other than Q vanishing again, only to return when his movement needs a shot in the arm. 

There have been three dozen new Q droppings since my last update. Will get around to posting them in the next couple of days. You can see them all at QAnon.pub.

william.scherk

Posted

Catching up on a massive dump of droppings by "Q" ...

q2802.png

q2803.png

q2804.png

q2805.png

q2806.png

q2807.png

q2808.png

q2809.png

q2810.png

q2811.png

william.scherk

Posted

Solidarity forever! "We Are Q!"  Oh really, Marge.

q2812.png

q2813.png

q2814.png

q2815.png

q2816.png

q2817.png

q2818.png

q2819.png

q2820.png

q2821.png

william.scherk

Posted

Every day is Q-Day in Kook World.  Whether you are simply suggestible, fantasy-prone, comforted by delusions or false beliefs -- there is room for everyone -- as long as you junk Objectivist/Objectivish epistemology, reason, logic and dissent.  

q2822.png

q2823.png

q2824.png

q2825.png

q2826.png

q2827.png

q2828.png

q2829.png

q2830.png

q2831.png

william.scherk

Posted

Some light cynicism from Travis View, one of the three hosts of the fabulous QAnonAnonymous podcast.

3 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Whether you are simply suggestible, fantasy-prone, comforted by delusions or false beliefs -- there is room for everyone -- as long as you junk Objectivist/Objectivish epistemology, reason, logic and dissent.  

Heresy!

 

 

william.scherk

Posted

A baker's dozen of days-old confections.

q2832.png

q2833.png

q2834.png

q2835.png

q2836.png

q2837.png

q2838.png

q2839.png

a2840.png

q2841.png

q2842.png

q2843.png

q2844.png

william.scherk

Posted

Thirteen is your lucky number.

q2845.png

q2846.png

q2847.png

q2848.png

q2849.png

q2850.png

q2851.png

q2852.png

q2853.png

q2954.png

q2855.png

q2856.png

q2857.png

william.scherk

Posted

Four and nine is thirteen.  Or is it?

q2858.png

q2859.png

q2860.png

q2861.png

q2862.png

q2863.png

q2864.png

q2865.png

q2866.png

q2867.png

q2868.png

q2869.png

q2870.png

"Sex Puppy" is on Q's mind.

william.scherk

Posted

The final tranches of whoopee to date coming up ...

q2871.png

q2872.png

q2873.png

q2874.png

q2875.png

q2876.png

q2877.png

q2878.png

q2879.png


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now