Message added by william.scherk

For a ground-floor view of the phenomena of QAnon ... including the gestation of 'Watkins-Q-kun':


william.scherk

17,794 views

Credence and interest in the QAnon phenomena  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Which choice best represents your interest in the QAnon phenomenon

    • Uninterested
      2
    • Interested, but skeptical
      1
    • I already know what I know
      0
    • None of your business. I don't declare my interests
      0
    • "Don't bother to examine a folly ... "
      0
    • I'd be interested in an objective analysis of the phenomena
      0
    • I will explain everything in a guest post here, if given the opportunity
      0

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/02/2018 at 02:32 AM

I'd like to open a field of discussion for the QAnon phenomena.  Here is where I will post in already existing material presented at OL by members.  I'll take direction from comments and from poll answers. 

  • What is Q / QAnon?
  • Why should anyone on OL pay attention?
  • Is skepticism justified?
  • What are the main questions readers have in mind to guide discussion?

No special rules or guidelines for this thread; the OL guidelines are good enough and will apply here. .  Please keep personal abuse to a minimum. Creative insults are kosher, but if they aren't on topic, why post them?

hr

Our forum leader opened discussion on the phenomena back in January of this year.  My key-word search-term was "QAnon,"  not "Q," so the search results will not necessarily return all incidence of discussion touching on the phenomena.

On 1/3/2018 at 4:10 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

[...] If you really want to go down a Rabbit Hole where anti-deep state magic happens for real, look into "QAnon."

I will post a thing about him later, probably in a new thread or on the Conspiracy Theory thread. He's been spot on accurate predicting a lot of recent happenings right before they happen. More recently he's been doing some twittering and he seems to like hamming it up a bit, so here are a few teasers:

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

:)

 

More coming...

 

640 Comments


Recommended Comments



On 12/8/2021 at 1:07 PM, william.scherk said:
On 12/5/2021 at 3:02 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:
On 12/5/2021 at 2:49 PM, william.scherk said:
On 12/4/2021 at 9:24 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:
On 11/30/2021 at 5:08 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

As to Sidney Powell...

 

judge-jackson.jpg
WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

Obama Judge Linda Parker ignored Trump’s case on the integrity of the 2020 Election in Michigan raised by attorney Sidney Powell.   It’s not clear if she ever looked at it.
Expand  

That is some sloppy reporting.  Judge Parker went through each of the Michigan "Kraken" affiant declarations, one by one, as summarized in her August judgement.

If one doesn't read that judgement, and takes the sloppy antics at the Gateway Pundit as truth ...  "rhetoric is not a correct epistemological form for identifying facts."

Maybe.

Where are the facts about Ruby Freeman, then? Especially since the "rhetoric versus correct epistemological form" quote is from the same someone who has already judged her guilty, guilty, guilty

While in office, President Trump supported a claim that Ruby Freeman and her daughter were criminals.  One of the outlets that they sued has settled (OANN).

Today the daughter offered testimony to the January 6 committee-of-benghazi.

Can Trump supporters be convinced by the fruits of investigation?

 

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment

Thanks for the heads up, William. One other "mean fact" about Ruby Freeman's daughter's testimony was that Pizza delivery stores were called to her home and told they would be paid when the delivery guy arrived. No pizzas were ordered. That is rotten.   

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

What's happened to all the Q "drops"?

Ellen,

The last Q drop was in 2020 - see here.

After that, Q was forgotten for a while in the mainstream press, but then Biden started failing big-time and the left needed a scapegoat other then its own idiocy. So they drug out Q, wedded it to the Jan/ 6 event, and started putting out material as if Q were a current and present danger to the USA--that it would make rabid Patriots armed to the teeth invade the Capitol building and do all kinds of dastardly things to kill everyone.

For an entity that has no longer been active since 2020, the left is doing a pretty good job of keeping it alive.

:) 

Granted, there are a few hardcore conspiracy commentators in the alt media who have always referred to Q drops much in the same manner a preacher refers to Bible verses, but there are not many of them.

The fun part is here. Trump insiders like Kash Patel started goofing on the left and saying publicly "Q is fun" and things like that. And they get a kick out of watching the left go apeshit when they do. They used to call this triggering the left (from Alex Jones saying that all the time). I don't know if they still use that term, but they have not abandoned the activity. When you look, watching lefties go crazy and spin in circles over Q actually is kinda fun.

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Ellen,

The last Q drop was in 2020 - see here.

After that, […]


Michael,

Did you click on the link in my post?

It goes to one of William's posts where he copied Q "drops."

At this time all I see on those posts of William's is rectangles which are blank except for .png addresses - for instance q3218.png in the linked post.

I'm asking why the "drops" aren’t showing in William's posts.

Ellen

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:


Michael,

Did you click on the link in my post?

It goes to one of William's posts where he copied Q "drops."

At this time all I see on those posts of William's is rectangles which are blank except for .png addresses - for instance q3218.png in the linked post.

I'm asking why the "drops" aren’t showing in William's posts.

Ellen

Ellen,

I did go there, but after a few posts of no information, and it looked like it was going to be a loooooooooooooooong scroll, I left thinking there was something odd but not that important to Q Drops since they were published elsewhere.

Now I understand you were asking William what happened to his publication of Q Drops, not what happened to the Q Drops themselves.

Ahhh... Now I understand.

I only look challenged. But give me some time and I eventually get it.

:) 

 

But to answer your question, William posted image links on OL to a forum called 8chan where they were hosted. 8chan later changed its name to 8kun and all previous links went to hell. William did not fix the links he posted to OL after they became broken. So now we have that beauty of a series of posts you found just sitting there not informing nobody of nothing.

(Ah, come on. Triple negatives are fun.) :) 

Michael

Link to comment
50 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

But to answer your question, William posted image links on OL to a forum called 8chan where they were hosted. 8chan later changed its name to 8kun and all previous links went to hell. William did not fix the links he posted to OL after they became broken. So now we have that beauty of a series of posts you found just sitting there not informing nobody of nothing.

Ah, broken links - the curse of the internet.

Sure robs William's snootily demeaning remarks about "Q" and "Qists" of effect, since readers can hardly be expected to sneer with him at blank rectangles.

Ellen

  • Smile 1
Link to comment
On 6/21/2022 at 2:51 PM, Ellen Stuttle said:

What's happened to all the Q "drops"?

See page 6, for instance:

https://www.objectivistliving.com/blogs/entry/756-in-the-matter-of-q/page/6/?tab=comments#comment-2738

Ellen

The 'dead' links were a consequence of a failure at my then hosting company -- and the end of QMap.pub (the foremost, most-cited aggregator/indexer of Q posts).  All of the image links here are dead because of a difference in notation.

For example, from the link provided:  

On 4/5/2019 at 10:22 AM, william.scherk said:

Adam Schiff is going down!  See Q-dropping 3223 below.  It is almost all over for him!

http://wsscherk.hostingmyself.com/VIDEOCASTS/Q2/q3216.png

The image itself was served from a folder at my hosting company, whereas if you clicked the original image, the embedded link (of in this case image #3216) would open this URL: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/5909128.html#5909596

That link is dead. 8chan/8ch is no more (8kun is the remainder, which I presume preserves the original Q posts in a mirror of old 8chan).

The 3216 image itself is a screen capture of a single posting at one of the two then-active aggregation sites, most likely QMap.pub, which is no more. 

q3216.png

...

On 4/5/2019 at 10:22 AM, william.scherk said:

If this were my website, I could simply do a global search and replace -- replacing all instances of 'wsscherk.hostingmyself.com' with wsscherk.com, and replacing the http:// with https://. Eg, https://wsscherk.com/VIDEOCASTS/Q2/q3217.png

q3217.png

q3218.png

I don't know if there are any aggregator sites like QMap that still remain broadly accessible. 2020 was the year that most social media giants removed QAnon accounts after Frederick Brennan helped orchestrate the deplatforming of 8chan.

Anyhow, I am sorry that most if not all of the screencapped Q drops from the defunct aggregator and hostingmyself.com are not showing. The only thing I can offer is the work-around -- since the 'this is a dead image URL' sign retains the number of each particular drop.

 

On 5/24/2019 at 11:11 AM, william.scherk said:

 

I have a library of Q posts in three folders.**

First block of Q 'caps: https://wsscherk.com/VIDEOCASTS/Q  -- posts 2687-3163
Second block: https://wsscherk.com/VIDEOCASTS/Q2 -- posts 3164-3426
Third block: https://wsscherk.com/VIDEOCASTS/Q3/ -- posts 3427-3786

Where it all started ...

QFirstDroppings.png

 

 

______________

** 

Spoiler

The directory is searchable and customizable, in case you wanted to search down a particular drop-image:

qmapQ-directory.png

qmapQ-directorySearch.png

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
On 6/14/2021 at 2:54 PM, william.scherk said:

For relationships strained and destroyed, amid minor tragedies, Reddit has "QAnon Casualties" ... though I seem to recall someone in this topic raised a "how could we know these are not invented?" question about the stories posted there. 

I shoulda looked the query up first, but I will post this anyway.  Verification seems at hand ... so sad and shitty. 

 

Link to comment

An interview with Jacob Chansley, from detention:

The shownotes/description "chapter headings" are what intrigued me ...

Quote

Intro and prison conditions: 0:00 - 05:34
What is a shaman?: 05:34 - 11:52
What catalysed you to get involved in politics?: 11:52 - 16:22
Where does Trump fit into this whole thing? (Q): 16:22 - 19:33
Adrenochrome and elite bloodlines: 16:22 - 24:48
Blood libel and anti-semetism: 24:48 - 26:55
Qanon, the storm. What did Q do? What happens now?: 26:55 - 29:24
Qanon, the storm. Was Q a psyop?: 29:24 - 33:00
Jan 6th, should have Trump have done more?: 33:00 - 34:37
Media portrayal of Q Shaman as Antifa: 34:37 - 35:33
What everyone should do to directly effect change: 35:33 - 37:44
What do you think about violent elements that use the cover of mass movements to do violence?: 37:44 - 39:57
Do you have any regrets?: 39:57 - 41:13
How do you think you'll be remembered by history?: 41:13 - 41:23
Channel 5 and Qshaman rap song drop: 41:23 - 42:50
I cant believe your lawyer said you were retarded: 42:50 - 43:36
What media outlets do you trust?: 43:36 - 43:40
Wrap up, potential other documentaries and future plans: 43:40 - 44:37

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now