Peikoff rant against libertarians


9thdoctor

Recommended Posts

Although John Allison is off the Board, he is still making a continuing commitment to the Ayn Rand Institute.

Which leaves the contradictions between what he told the ARIans and what he's been telling the Cato folks unresolved.

Robert Campbell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Although John Allison is off the Board, he is still making a continuing commitment to the Ayn Rand Institute.

Which leaves the contradictions between what he told the ARIans and what he's been telling the Cato folks unresolved.

Robert Campbell

Sounds to me like ARI could be accused of sanctioning Cato, and thus libertarianism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like ARI could be accused of sanctioning Cato, and thus libertarianism.

I'm sure you've already seen the video, but here I go promoting it again:

5 likes and 11 dislikes. :sad: My inner Peter Keating is not happy with the results of his poll among the guests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.theameric...nks-of-society/

Here’s a little detail I didn’t know till now. We all know David Kelley was excommunicated for speaking at Laissez Faire Books. I think there was more to it, but be that as it may. Turns out John Aglialoro was excommunicated for speaking at…wait for it…The Cato Institute. Does he expect John Allison to suffer the same fate?

TAC: So do you expect him to be excommunicated?

JA: I think there’s been a change of mentality. Yaron Brook is now executive director of ARI, and I think Leonard gave him the sanction to carry on. They’re now joining the ranks of society, philosophical society. The libertarian, the political; it’s not just up here [gestures with his hands]. [Working with libertarians] is no longer anathema.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.theameric...nks-of-society/

Here’s a little detail I didn’t know till now. We all know David Kelley was excommunicated for speaking at Laissez Faire Books. I think there was more to it, but be that as it may. Turns out John Aglialoro was excommunicated for speaking at…wait for it…The Cato Institute. Does he expect John Allison to suffer the same fate?

TAC: So do you expect him to be excommunicated?

JA: I think there’s been a change of mentality. Yaron Brook is now executive director of ARI, and I think Leonard gave him the sanction to carry on. They’re now joining the ranks of society, philosophical society. The libertarian, the political; it’s not just up here [gestures with his hands]. [Working with libertarians] is no longer anathema.

Peter Swartz? Who's he?

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So where does Diana Hsieh fit into this mess? Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't she Peikoff's pitbull for a while?-and I believe she is, or was, running objectivismoffline. So after her middle finger to TAS in order to secure the good graces of Peikoff, it looks as though, now, her reasoning has come full circle to show both her and Peikoff's superciliousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will we now hear of Peter Schwartz's excommunication?

That'll be the day.

Robert Campbell

PS. I'm surprised that after all this time John Aglialoro still refers to Leonard Peikoff as Rand's "intellectual heir."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So where does Diana Hsieh fit into this mess? Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't she Peikoff's pitbull for a while?-and I believe she is, or was, running objectivismoffline. So after her middle finger to TAS in order to secure the good graces of Peikoff, it looks as though, now, her reasoning has come full circle to show both her and Peikoff's superciliousness.

Superfluity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So where does Diana Hsieh fit into this mess? Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't she Peikoff's pitbull for a while?-and I believe she is, or was, running objectivismoffline.

I don't think that she ever ran OO. She may have been in tight with its owners or moderators at one point. It used to be that some of the moderators at OO would protect her by deleting posts which were critical of her opinions, but not so anymore, or at least no where near as much as in the past.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're going to keep your position as Leonard Peikoff's pitbull, you can't contradict him on anything.

Diana Hsieh was already taking issue with some of his nuttier podcasts before she questioned the expulsion of John McCaskey.

Whether Dr. Peikoff has become superfluous remains to be determined.

Of Dr. Hsieh's superfluity, there can be no reasonable doubt.

Robert Campbell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diana Hsieh was already taking issue with some of his nuttier podcasts before she questioned the expulsion of John McCaskey.

Chronologically the Ground Zero Mosque came first. She was against any legal attempt to stop it, and wouldn’t allow disagreement with that view, else down comes the already well-worn ban-hammer. Then, surprise(!), Peikoff came out stridently on the other side. I think she was blindsided, though we can only speculate whether she’d have handled the issue differently if Peikoff had said his piece first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Today's Peikoff podcast is all about libertarianism. Maybe I need to listen again before passing this judgement, but I think he might have reached a new level of knuckleheadedness. "Liberty" simply can't be an "ism". Bet you never thought of that before! You may as well be for "justice-ism".

http://www.peikoff.com/2012/10/22/a-discussion-with-yaron-brook-on-libertarianism/

Or how about "liberalism"? "Conservatism"? "Socialism"?

Ooh, here's my favorite: "Democratic Republicanism"? What kind of lame brain would ever use a label like that?

jeffport.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's Peikoff podcast is all about libertarianism. Maybe I need to listen again before passing this judgement, but I think he might have reached a new level of knuckleheadedness. "Liberty" simply can't be an "ism". Bet you never thought of that before! You may as well be for "justice-ism".

http://www.peikoff.c...libertarianism/

Or how about "liberalism"? "Conservatism"? "Socialism"?

Ooh, here's my favorite: "Democratic Republicanism"? What kind of lame brain would ever use a label like that?

jeffport.jpg

How about objectivity can't be an "ism"? Therefore it's silly to call something "Objectivism"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you mean his accent, he grew up in Israel and is presumably not a native English-speaker. This never struck me as an impediment; he wouldn't have had a career as a talking head if it were.

Peikoff is the one who can't control his tongue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you mean his accent, he grew up in Israel and is presumably not a native English-speaker.

I've known many native Israelis who are capable of saying their Rs properly. Brook is the only one I've ever heard who says Ws instead. It's not an Israeli thing.

This never struck me as an impediment; he wouldn't have had a career as a talking head if it were.

I think something counts as an impediment when a person is incapable of properly pronouncing letter-sounds. See, the point is that his ability to speak is impeded in some way, not that his ability to earn a living is. And I don't know that his career hasn't been hindered. I've heard a lot of people laughing at his "Elmer Fudd" delivery, and saying that it's hard to take someone seriously when they talk like that. Not only that, but the more serious and intelligent the issue being discussed, the funnier they think the accent is, since the clash between the substance and the style becomes more apparent when the subject is deeper.

Peikoff is the one who can't control his tongue.

Good point.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter,

I've also known native Israelis and heard a variety of Israeli accents in English.

Never heard the "w" for "r" substitution from anyone besides Yaron Brook.

That's a speech impediment.

It develops in early childhood. More exactly, most kids make this mispronunciation early in life and then outgrow it. (When my daughter was 2 years old, she said "wocks." Before she had turned three, they were "rocks.") But a few, for reasons we don't understand very well, never get past it, are still making the "w" for "r" substitution as adults.

Robert Campbell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's Peikoff podcast is all about libertarianism. Maybe I need to listen again before passing this judgement, but I think he might have reached a new level of knuckleheadedness. "Liberty" simply can't be an "ism". Bet you never thought of that before! You may as well be for "justice-ism".

Or worse, Justicialism.

I am afraid to listen to Uncle Kookiepants, but I will. Maybe the Doctor is wrong and the wisdom drips like pure sweet honey.

Here is the leading Justicialist in the world, recieving her sash of office:

cristina-fernandez-florencia-kirchner-2011-12-10-10-51-1.jpg

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never heard the "w" for "r" substitution from anyone besides Yaron Brook.

That's a speech impediment.

OTOH, Rand always had a problem with "th". Instead of faith she'd say face. Also her "ch" was usually closer to "sh". As in, "sank you wary mush".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what Brook's ancestry is, but some Germans talk this way - from around Berlin, I think. Marlene Dietrich was famous for it (see Madeleine Kahn's takeoff in

), and it didn't hurt her career either. "Brook" is not hard to imagine as an anglicization of "Bruch."

(Rand also said "werry" for "very.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OTOH, Rand always had a problem with "th". Instead of faith she'd say face. Also her "ch" was usually closer to "sh". As in, "sank you wary mush".

I don't know what Brook's ancestry is, but some Germans talk this way - from around Berlin, I think. Marlene Dietrich was famous for it (see Madeleine Kahn's takeoff in

), and it didn't hurt her career either. "Brook" is not hard to imagine as an anglicization of "Bruch."

(Rand also said "werry" for "very.")

Rand and Dietrich also had very obvious foreign accents in multiple respects, where Brook does not. Several of their letter pronunciations were off, as is typical of foreigners. Brook, on the other hand, sounds like an American in all respects except for the W-for-R substitution. It's clearly not an accent issue deriving from a different language.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what Brook's ancestry is, but some Germans talk this way - from around Berlin, I think.

According the Wikipedia article on Yaron Brook, "Yaron Brook was born and raised in Israel. His parents were Jewish socialists who were originally from South Africa." I assume his first language was modern Hebrew, not Berlinish**.

It is usually not nice to make fun of or point out a speech impediment. In this case, more fun can be made of doing somersaults to imagine Brook's troubles with R are an accent.

It doesn't matter to viewers/listeners, I would wager. The fact that he speaks funny will be put to 'accent' alone. Many Americans have 'odd' accents, and it is not a bad thing. I am always amazed at the strikingly-convincing American accents put on (or adopted for good) by Kiwi and Aussie and UK performers: Russel Crowe, Heath Ledger, Hugh Laurie, Nicole Kidman ... they are professionals who have programmed their mouth parts to do this. Brook has no need to programme his mouth parts, since he is Objectivist, and is mostly perfect anyhow.

This is from a guy who loathes Brook's policies in re targetting civilians for US wrath (when 'necessary'). This insanity has nothing to do with Objectivism and much to do with his attachment to dead-end military fascism. It could have been him looking like Doctor Strangelove on Bill O'Reilly, but the craziness would have been in his words and convictions, not in an Elmer Fudd presentation.

After all, the dulcet tones of Peikoff's particular voice are not what make him odious, but his cruelty and stupidity.

________________

** Here's Marlene singing Where have all the flowers gone. For the life of me I cannot discern a Bwook-level Fuddishness with the phoneme R.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKxaMAxC3Go

Where have all the gwaveyawds gone?

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only listened to a few clips of Brook, I noticed the w's but mainly I thought he had a New York accent - it did not sound Israeli to me at all. I thought he was a native English speaker with the impediment.

Carol

ESL teacher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what Brook's ancestry is, but some Germans talk this way - from around Berlin, I think.

According the Wikipedia article on Yaron Brook, "Yaron Brook was born and raised in Israel. His parents were Jewish socialists who were originally from South Africa." I assume his first language was modern Hebrew, not Berlinish**.

It is usually not nice to make fun of or point out a speech impediment. In this case, more fun can be made of doing somersaults to imagine Brook's troubles with R are an accent.

It doesn't matter to viewers/listeners, I would wager. The fact that he speaks funny will be put to 'accent' alone. Many Americans have 'odd' accents, and it is not a bad thing. I am always amazed at the strikingly-convincing American accents put on (or adopted for good) by Kiwi and Aussie and UK performers: Russel Crowe, Heath Ledger, Hugh Laurie, Nicole Kidman ... they are professionals who have programmed their mouth parts to do this. Brook has no need to programme his mouth parts, since he is Objectivist, and is mostly perfect anyhow.

This is from a guy who loathes Brook's policies in re targetting civilians for US wrath (when 'necessary'). This insanity has nothing to do with Objectivism and much to do with his attachment to dead-end military fascism. It could have been him looking like Doctor Strangelove on Bill O'Reilly, but the craziness would have been in his words and convictions, not in an Elmer Fudd presentation.

After all, the dulcet tones of Peikoff's particular voice are not what make him odious, but his cruelty and stupidity.

________________

** Here's Marlene singing Where have all the flowers gone. For the life of me I cannot discern a Bwook-level Fuddishness with the phoneme R.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKxaMAxC3Go

Where have all the gwaveyawds gone?

Oh! Its twue, its twue ---- Madelene von Stupp in Blazing Saddles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now