william.scherk

Members
  • Posts

    9,165
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    66

Status Updates posted by william.scherk

  1. Snapshot of warrior life. 

     

  2. A couple Tweets from the war on Ukraine.

     

     

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Peter

      Peter

      17 or 18 year olds. That isn't so young but why the heck? I thought Russia was winning with the guys they already had. Maybe Russia just "allowed" "The Hunt For Red October" to be shown.   

    3. william.scherk
    4. anthony

      anthony

      "As Ukraine scrambles to defend itself from Russia's illegal invasion, men aged 18 to 60 have been banned from leaving the country. The declaration of martial law in Ukraine gives the government power to enact this ban, but it is not in keeping with human rights or humanitarian norms".

  3. Just checking to see how the meta-tags show when OL interprets the Open Graphic code at the link. The link should drop us down to a particular video on the media list. 

    mariupol.png
    WSSCHERK.COM

    Have figured out a few more useful means of delivering topical audio, video and brief commentary.

     

  4. A grim night and day ahead in the Ukrainian city of Mariupol ...

     

  5. I've followed Russia hand Julia Ioffe for a long time. Here she sat for almost an hour's interview with the PBS crew putting together their "Putin's Road to War."

    She is a thorough-going Trump cynic, but discusses Trump's policy stances and relationship with Putin without rancour --  and is able to give the penetrating analysis that broad scope, deep knowledge and long-term research allow. If you just want a sample, start at 30 minutes. This is about what Putin sees in America, in what measure was what he saw in American division/paralysis a factor in risking the Ukraine operation now.

    Although Kremlinology surely has its odd aspects -- eg, spiritualism or mind-reading, wishcasting, partyism or institute-itis -- Ioffe's 'Inside the Mind' readings seem to rest on firmer footings. "What do you think is going on in that guy's mentality that explains this decision-tree?"

    If Ioffe is on the money, among the take-home truths are that Putin got shitty intelligence about what awaited the special operation forces, in terms of Ukrainian resolve and readiness, and in terms of actual Russian strength and weakness. 

    "The bad news somehow didn't make it to the top." 
    "Putin is the moderating voice in that camp." I paraphrase.

     

    -- for a more speculative 'The Psy-Op that Failed' observation, analysis and argument this one stood out for me, in a Twitter thread by Kamil Galeev as far back as February 28:

     

    1. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      Three two-minute chunks of Julia Ioffe's interview ...

       

    2. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      The video excerpt got 44,000 "impressions" and 25,000 video plays in under 24 hours.  Julia Ioffe has a lot of fans.

    3. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      Deep dive into attitudes within Russia.  Julia Ioffe's article in Puck.news interviews one of the founders of "The People of Baikal":

      GettyImages-1240063728-scaled-e165058530
      PUCK.NEWS

      Vladimir Putin’s misbegotten war is a blatant attempt to restore his vision of the Russky mir—a pan-Slavic neo-Soviet nation state built on Russian dominance. And yet his war is being waged by the very young...

       Text-to-speech to come ...

  6. "I Yam Winning the Propaganda [War] 'Special Military Operation'" ...

     

    1. anthony

      anthony

      "Looks like".

      That is how far the once thinking civilized people have devolved. The sensory-perceptual-associational level.

      Look at his face! Listen to his tone!

      Tells you everything!

       

    2. Michael Stuart Kelly

      Michael Stuart Kelly

      A very odd thing is happening on the Internet. It's kinda clickbaity.

      Somebody says, "You won't believe how XXX melted down and stormed off." 

      Who doesn't like gossip? So off you go to watch the video? Then you see a person make a firm comment that he feels at an impasse and his time is up anyway. He gets up and leaves, saying, "Goodbye" politely to everyone.

      And you wonder, where was the storm? Where was the meltdown?

      I don't know how many of these I have seen.

       

      The video of Putin above is another. I didn't see angry paranoia. I didn't see a person too small to blame himself, so he blames everyone else--at least not anything that resembles the people I have seen who do that. I didn't see anyone channeling Stalin and Mao.

      (Oddly enough, I agree with him when he bashes people who believe they belong to a higher caste. I want to be  careful, though, that he and I are referring to the same thing when I bash these people. I think we are. And if we are, I look on in wonder. How does a guy like him see this? :) )

      I did see a person saying thoughts that align with his strongman posture. But I didn't see any raving or foaming at the mouth. His speaking tone was normal. He did use some hyperbole. But on a scale of 1 to 10, the hyperbole was about a 3 at most.

      Doesn't anyone remember Hitler sounding like a dog barking? I didn't see anything like that.

      I wonder what value people get in selling emotional hysteria and delivering normal shit.

      One can (and should) bash Putin. One doesn't need to lie or trick the audience to do that.

      So why do it?

      Lack of talent to do it right?

      Michael

    3. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      The full speech cited above, subtitled.

      Thanks for the conversation-starter, Tony. I missed the responses to this "Status" post. Which is what happens when one has divided attention ...

  7. The leading candidate for the Conservative Party of Canada leadership is Pierre Poilievre --- born in Alberta with his surname from dad's origins in the small Saskatchewan 'French Canadian' community, better known now as the 'Fransaskois' community. Despite his prairie French roots, French is his second language and acquired mostly in his adult years.

    His command of the language under question and in Parliament is almost perfect, more smoothly functional than Jagmeet Singh, and much more fluid and less stilted than previous leaders Erin O'Toole and Andrew Scheer. Basic fluency in French is an unstated rule for federal party leaders, and being at home in French can offer added bonus points and lures for Quebec voters. Being more than functional in the language of the majority in lhe province never upends a race, but helps in the hustle, the selling phase. Quebec voters can be as fickle as any other provincial bloc.

    Compared to O'Toole and Scheer, Poilievre sounds and looks fresh and on point in encounters, fresher still compared to the ancient Jean Charest (former federal Progressive Conservative leader, former Liberal premier of Quebec), rumoured to jump in the race. 

    Here we get good questions, strong answers -- in the sense of short phrases, no wriggling, in this interview replay on Facebook Video. 

    75460297_203462960702402_536439736367683
    WWW.FACEBOOK.COM

    Course à la direction du Parti conservateur du Canada : « Il y a beaucoup de Québécois qui me [disent] que je serais un bon candidat. C’est quelque...

     

    Here is Jagmeet. I think Poilievre could kill in this format, whereas Jag merely hit all the points in his general script:

    If it seems a little bit weird to see a Sikh man representing a Vancouver-area suburb doing politics in French in North America, but that is the deal. You have to be good enough to perform under pressure in the language of one-fourth of the population. At least to be seriously in the game.

    I had assumed a francophone background for Poilievre. Rong! Like Singh, he worked at it. He positioned himself and worked it.

    If I were Trudeau I would half-dread half-relish the prospect of a fight for power with Pierre Poilievre.  Ultimately, I think Poilievre will get a stint at Sussex Drive. If the Conservatives are not too stupid and tear themselves in two one more time. 

    1. Marc

      Marc

      It sure seems like he going to run the table to get the nomination, no ? 

      Obviously others will challenge but I sure get the feeling that he is our next PM.

      Great post, thank you! 

  8. Everyone has likely seen this moment when a Russian broadcast was momentarily marred by dissent.  The lady was hauled off to jail in the immediate aftermath, of course.

    Ukrainian-Australian Zoya Sheftalovich translated the Ukrainian president's latest address, which was in Ukrainian and Russian, and had some poignant items. We pick up her thread at entry nine:

    Did Zelensky deliver a master-class in Propaganda/Persuasion? It seems like he is directly addressing the invader conscripts in their own language, sure -- but how many could possibly have listened to his address? If the Ukrainian claim is even partly true that "we can listen to your [military radio chatter] communications," then does it go the other way? Would conscripts on the fronts or in convoy be in a position to listen to the Ukrainian president, would that not also be an offense in itself?

  9. Volodomyr Zelensky was an actor, most famous for the Ukrainian television series Servant of the People (Слуга народа). The series is online, of course:

    maxresdefault.jpg
    T.CO

    Сериал комедия Слуга народа, смотреть онлайн.Присоединяйтесь к нам в социальных...

     

  10. Now they tell us ...

     

    1. Michael Stuart Kelly

      Michael Stuart Kelly

      William,

      News agencies in other countries outside of the West have been saying that for two days. (And in alt news.) And that Zelensky is considering accepting some of Russia's demands.

      Instead, here in the West in the mainstream, Zelensky is Winston Churchill.

      :) 

      Michael

  11. Of my three 'a-political' Russian YouTube channels only two remain so. In Saint Petersburg, Sergey Baklykov's live-stream channel has had him lay down the hard line just recently -- in terms of de-nazification and special operations to ensure Ukrainian neutrality.

    If you are familiar with broad strokes of official state messaging in Russian to Russians, you wouldn't have been surprised to hear it from Sergey as he did his Live in St Pete sundowner rounds in the gorgeous public spaces of the old capital. 

    Sergey did take a stroll down to where the demonstrations against the 'special operations' were going to occur.  That live video was not retained. It's got to be a weird line to walk: at least partially dependent on the good favour of foreign English-speakers, and at the same time, getting bellicose about the right of Putin to do what he must do. Sergey gets pushback but doesn't get into the gutter or become personal. If he is able to keep broadcasting his perspective will be important as events ripen.

    At some point he will be likely entertaining dissent from other Russian in St Pete and beyond. It won't be able to be expressed in social media, being illegal, yet I imagine his thinking may shift if influence by the 'underground' current of opposition.

    ***

    Valeria and Alex and their dog Sheffield have some really nice American/Western/English-speaking fans. Without comment on the world outside her commonplace pursuits, Valeria head out with camera dedicated to telling it like it is -- supplementing her income from the fans is more difficult under sanctions but can be accomplished. Today's shortage reports were foreign chocolate and certain medications. The dog nees medication for its foot problems. Visually, their little corner of greater Moscow in late winter is like the beat-up part of Winnipeg in winter. Beaten up looking, scuffed, worn, dirty.

    ***

    The third channel I watch is by Dan Freekoz and features his extended family. In the recent "How are RUSSIANS Going To Survive Under SANCTIONS," one of the answers is shown: planting a buttload of potatoes.

     

    I hope none of these folks get cut off from any necessary lifelines. (of all of them, I think Valeria is the most enterprising -- in a plodding way -- with a Patreon, a second YouTube channel, and a Telegram presence, plus Etsy, Instagram ...)

    The tweet below was strangely moving. It's important to be hard-eyed in times of war, to keep a certain flinty disregard for largely emotional appeals. So many hearts aching, so much fear and loathing and contempt almost always on offer.

    Sometimes enough heartache is generated that it can become too difficult to be stony, even though freely expressing yourself can expose you to great personal risk.  If there is no public space for behaviour outside the bright lines, how will you express your thoughts? 

    Today I learned via my US/UK chemical warfare wonk that the Polish and Ukrainian languages are closer to each other than are Russian and Ukrainian. "Mutual intelligibility" being one of the yardsticks. 

    Who know they knew so little about the Polish-Lithuanian heyday (when Poland dominated Ukraine and shaped some of its unique aspects)?

    2022-03-07%2019_09_01-WIkiPediaLithPolCmmWlth-map.png

    By Wikipedia users Halibutt and Mathiasrex - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0

    -- word of the hour: Ruthenian; former word of the hour: Rusyn.

  12. Gack.

     

    1. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      As a tonic, a Twitter thread by Justin Ling:

       

  13. I follow three YouTube channels from Russia, each an "apolitical" slice-of-life channel, where families are featured doing what Russian families do -- when you have an English-speaking 'fan-base' outside of Russia.

    Different Russia is the most homely, boring, plodding of the three. Valeria Kovtunova will take you for a walk with her dog, Sheffield. She'll take you on the train, for a drive, to view the work at their dacha. 

    For the past several videos, the tone has shifted slightly.  Without Valeria saying a word about the war in Ukraine, you can feel the effect on their plodding, happy lives.  Previous videos showed how prices of goods had gone up sharply, with the ruble then having fallen below 100 to the US dollar.

    I don't believe that Russia will ban the use of YouTube by its citizens, although the State Duma is scheduled to vote tomorrow on a "False News" law with penalties of up to fifteen years in prison.  YouTube has "temporarily" demonetized Russian channels, so Valeria is not going to be able to supplement her family's earnings.

    The last day of Ikea for the Kovtunovs ...

     

    1. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      The Duma has passed the bill:

      webMetaImg?v=1
      GROUND.NEWS

      Russia's parliament on Friday passed a law that makes publishing "fake" news a crime, according to

       

  14. My language maintenance and learning uses machine-translated text-to-speech versions of items that I have written but not necessarily shared.

    This is a French reading (with a reasonably human-sounding Canadian accent) of my 2019 musings-to-self about a since-departed OLer:

    "Le seul moyen efficace de lui contrer est avec des moyens psychologiques, des moyens qui sont injustes. Bien qu'il parle de 'gaslighting,' il n'en a aucune idée (à moins que, comme Mama Bear le suggère, il y ait eu A Woman Involved)."
     
    Portuguese, with machined 'Brazilian' accent:

    Spanish with Mexican/US standard accent:

    Italian -- along with Portuguese, a big challenge for my ear, although I can read with varying comprehension due to a grounding in Romance language vocabulary:

    Just for fun, Romanian. It has a lovely sound.

    That is all pretty boring.  This is not on topic, either, but it stuck in my mind. What exactly would happen? 
     
  15.  

    1. Peter

      Peter

      William quoted  . . .” no matter how powerful it seems at the dawn the flag 🇺🇦 will still be there.:"

      Curious after Michael’s listing of legitimate Russian grievances against Ukraine, is Retaliatory use of force, or the Initiation of force, a priority for / against Russia? Think about it in philosophical terms. Why the hell does Russian need to invade a European country? Is Putin off his rocker? 

  16. NewsMax live at CPAC:

    President Trump is speaking.

  17. Top predator says what?

  18. Guess who has a book coming out?  

    toiletsCloggedClassified.gif

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      From Yahoo News: 

      Quote

      Former President Trump on Thursday responded to recent reports about his handling of White House records, claiming that the recent transfer of documents to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) from his resort in Florida was viewed as "no big deal."

      In a statement, Trump said he arranged for boxes containing "letters, records, newspapers, magazines, and various articles" to be transported to the National Archives after "collaborative and respectful discussions."

      "The media's characterization of my relationship with NARA is Fake News. It was exactly the opposite! It was a great honor to work with NARA to help formally preserve the Trump Legacy," he said.

      Earlier this week, The Washington Post reported that the National Archives had recovered 15 boxes of White House records from Mar-a-Lago. The New York Times later reported that possibly classified materials had been discovered among the recovered documents.

      "The papers were given easily and without conflict and on a very friendly basis, which is different from the accounts being drawn up by the Fake News Media," Trump said on Thursday. "In fact, it was viewed as routine and 'no big deal.' In actuality, I have been told I was under no obligation to give this material based on various legal rulings that have been made over the years."

      Trump also pushed back against reports that documents were regularly found flushed down the toilet in the presidential residence during his time in office, calling the claim "categorically untrue and simply made up by a reporter in order to get publicity for a mostly fictitious book."

       

      seo-image.jpg
      WWW.DONALDJTRUMP.COM

      Over the past four years, Donald J. Trump's administration delivered for Americans of all backgrounds like never before. Save America is about building on those accomplishments!
    3. william.scherk
    4. Peter

      Peter

      Apparently, it is BS and not Tsh.. He says it never happened and the person who said it is just trying to sell a book. 

  19. The come-on for this video is "why did London's Millennial Bridge oscillate and require two years of engineering before it re-opened?"

    I got hooked into the the whole thing by the part where you could see people essentially marching in step on the swaying bridge. How did that happen? How do/why do people synchronize?  

    This video goes places ...

     

    1. Michael Stuart Kelly

      Michael Stuart Kelly

      William,

      Cool.

      I've seen this before, but the video is well-worth watching.

      In my writing studies, I came across the tip to "synchronize" the minds of the readers or listeners by using short words that don't flow, then follow with words that do flow. One example was Abraham Lincoln:

      Four score and seven years ago.

      That sticks in the mind a lot better than 87. And not just because it's further removed from simple math.

      The rhythm is sort of like:

      Fump. Fump. da-DAA-da-da-da-da.

      The two fumps synchronize the mind, then the rest of the line kind of completes a small unit.

      In music, the reason for the count-off at the beginning of many pop songs is to synchronize minds. The very rhythm underlying popular music synchronizes people.

      Once I became aware of this synchronizing thing in communications and art, I began to see it everywhere. 

      It even fits well with the AIDA form of writing:
      A - Attention - get the audience's attention.
      I - Interest - cause interest by presenting the familiar with a promise of something new about it.
      D - Desire/Deliver - increase desire by examples and explanations (or even stories) that whet appetites or cause outrage, and/or deliver ideas in the same manner.
      A - Action - tell the audience what to do.

      Synchronizing is an excellent way to get attention. And it also works along the way to reset interest when lulls happen.

      As the video shows, synchronization is a metaphysical form-making thing. It's universal, not just limited to this or that.

      I'm glad you found this.

      :) 

      Michael

  20. How this neuron movement depiction was accomplished, I have no idea.  I also had no idea that neurons have this apparent 'seeking' behaviour:

     

  21. The wags at the Daily Show have culled some prime Jeanine Pirro bits for a 'Daily Affirmations' video. For fans of straight talk. 

     

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      Jeanine Pirro has apparently ended the long run of "Justice with Judge Jeanine" and will transition to Fox's "The Five," according to a story at Bizpacreview, Jeanine Pirro says goodbye to her audience in final show.

       

    3. Michael Stuart Kelly

      Michael Stuart Kelly

      Trevor Noah?

      Heh...

      A few headlines gathered at random (filtering for last year on DuckDuckGo, since headlines for Trevor Noah ratings for last month were not related to ratings).

      ‘Daily Show’ Ratings Plummet to Shocking New Lows

      Nolte: Late-Night Talk Shows Suffer Major Ratings Losses Without Trump

      Nolte: Trevor Noah-Hosted Grammy Awards Ratings Worst Ever By a Mile

      'The Daily Show' With Trevor Noah Ratings Drop 40%

      Late-Night Talk Shows Suffering from Massive Rating Losses

      There are lots more where that came from.

      And here are some people who like watching The Office, South Park, etc., but they are bitching about the commercials for The Daily Show and Trevor Noah. The thread was started last July and continued until last December. I don't think these have any strong political leanings for comedy (maybe a bit rightish), instead mostly a wish to watch something funny.

      Does anyone actually watch the Daily Show with Trevor Noah?

      Read through the comments and I believe you will get a general view of what most people think of him and his show. 

      So now the question becomes, if a comedian tells a joke in the middle of the woods and nobody heard it, did he really tell it?

      Go to Comedy Central's The Daily Show and see if you can figure it out.

      :) 

      Meanwhile, does anyone want to compare Trevor Noah's ratings against those of Jeanine Pirro?

      One may not like her in-your-face-nonstop-contempt for-bullies tone, but she does it well enough to get people to watch her (Justice with Jeanine regularly got well over one million views per show on Saturday nights and not that much in ads). Now she will become a permanent host on The Five, which gets well over three million.)

      Trevor Noah, despite lavish ad and publicity funding, tells jokes for a living and only manages to gather a cringe fringe group of bigots around him. Race-wise, his show is the reverse of a Minstrel show, but fundament-wise (i.e., mannerism humor for bigots), it's the same crap. 

      :evil: 

      The good news is that his poor ratings are a great quality-signal for modern society and a sad indication of the state of bigotry of the upper echelons of the modern predator class. People in general (all types and colors) don't like bigoted mockery as their form of humor. They don't tune in. They might take a little as part of a larger context, but they don't like It as their main comedy. In that sense, the world is in a pretty good place.

      But that Noah dude still gets funding, so if only we could get the bigots out of the upper class of the predator state...

      Leftie predator class people generally call others racist to hide their own racism and bigotry. They are in power right now from cheating, but it's a good thing they are in the minority. They will soon not be in power so that part of the culture--their raw bigotry--will fade, and will do so to the relief of all.

      Michael

    4. william.scherk

      william.scherk

      "Leftie predator class people" ... 

  22. What undersea volcanoes in the South Pacific look like when they blow, from a satellite vantage. The shock wave from the eruption off Tonga's shores perturbed the atmosphere. Early reports from Tonga are hopeful that the resulting tsunami did result in human slaughter. New Zealand is the closest nation with a will to help and the ability to do so. 

    New Zealand coverage roundup.

    1. Peter

      Peter

      I remember living in Hawaii as a Navy brat and an earthquake occurred so we rushed to the shore to see a few inches of high wave appear. What a let down. I think that is an old story I have told before, but I also remember a different smell from the water, like something rotten.  

  23. Hoping everyone has the happiest of holidays, close to family and full of plenty.  


    aynRandXmas.jpg

    See you all on the other side of Christmas ...