sbeaulieu Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Why would the state wither away like that? Why wouldn't it do what most states do: find new threats and new reasons for its continued existence and expansion? For instance, there are always social problems and there are always external threats -- and even if neither are that serious, new ones can be dreamed up or current ones exaggerated.I don't disagree that the state would try to find new ways to sucker its population into supporting, through "voluntary" taxation, new problems or threats. Let's just hope that the public would be a smarter breed and see through the BS. ~ Shane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan2100 Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Why would the state wither away like that? Why wouldn't it do what most states do: find new threats and new reasons for its continued existence and expansion? For instance, there are always social problems and there are always external threats -- and even if neither are that serious, new ones can be dreamed up or current ones exaggerated.I don't disagree that the state would try to find new ways to sucker its population into supporting, through "voluntary" taxation, new problems or threats. Let's just hope that the public would be a smarter breed and see through the BS. ~ ShaneThere's definitely an arms race of sorts between the rulers and the ruled. I also think there are definite limits to statism, especially under a competitive international order. (Which hints that the less competitive an internation order is, the less stringent the limits on statism.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now