Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 8, 2009 Author Share Posted October 8, 2009 Stuttle,Just because you don't use the word "dishonest," doesn't mean the concept of dishonest is not present. You essentially accused me of being in collusion with Pross to pull one over on everybody to let him get away with plagiarism, then lie about it and pretend to be the victim only because it got found out. I gave my reasons for doing what I did and you said they were basically a lie. That means dishonest in Kelly-speak, but maybe not in Stuttle-speak.I find you insistence on this accusation at the time disgusting.But it's still up.You also qualified your statement about Jennifer's book "if you (Stuttle) are right" (about "the point" in PARC), her book Goddess "does a good job of making it." In other words, her book makes your point if you are right (and does a good job at that). Well what if you're wrong? Does her book change all of a sudden and no longer make "the point"? Are the meanings in her book based on you being right or wrong? Here's some news. Her book means what it means and has nothing to do with whether you are right or wrong about anything, much less some wacky theory to make Valliant's vicious integrity-and-scholarship-be-damned attack on the Brandens not look like that.Pure Stuttle-speak.Boneheaded.Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now