Jon Letendre Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 15 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said: Rand's thesis is that the sanction of evil puts the potency of the sanctioner into evil. No sanction no transfer of potency and evil dies on the vine or it never gets going in the first place. --Brant Correct. And now it’s not impotent. Like I said, many posts ago. In the land of make-believe, where no one ever sanctions evil, evil is impotent. In the world we live in, evil is not impotent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 11 minutes ago, Jon Letendre said: Correct. And now it’s not impotent. Like I said, many posts ago. In the land of make-believe, where no one ever sanctions evil, evil is impotent. In the world we live in, evil is not impotent. That's why Rand wrote Atlas Shrugged. You just tossed the novel into the trash can. --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Good creates, evil negates; sanction or no sanction. Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Brant Gaede said: That's why Rand wrote Atlas Shrugged. You just tossed the novel into the trash can. --Brant I just checked my shelves, Brant, and all five copies are still there. Do you need a nap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said: Good creates, evil negates; sanction or no sanction. Brant I have agreed to that multiple times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Wrecking balls negate. Are they impotent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 42 minutes ago, Jon Letendre said: I just checked my shelves, Brant, and all five copies are still there. Do you need a nap? Lots of great sex! --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 56 minutes ago, Jon Letendre said: I have agreed to that multiple times. Ah, so negation is potency? Like 9/11? --Brant it is to the Jihads and their tribe--are we saying potency is contextual (or is it just me)? I am saying in the context of Western Civilization potency is individualistic and the rest of whatever you want to call it is collectivist and destructive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Letendre Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 12 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said: Ah, so negation is potency? Like 9/11? --Brant it is to the Jihads and their tribe--are we saying potency is contextual (or is it just me)? I am saying in the context of Western Civilization potency is individualistic and the rest of whatever you want to call it is collectivist and destructive Not just to the Jihadis. If I had been one of those forced to leap out a window to my death, I’m pretty sure on the way down I would not have been contemplating the impotence of those who did that to me. In the context of a dictionary, potency doesn’t convey good or bad. Potency is not moral, political or sociological, it just means power, including power to destroy. Evil is not impotent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 40 minutes ago, Jon Letendre said: Not just to the Jihadis. If I had been one of those forced to leap out a window to my death, I’m pretty sure on the way down I would not have been contemplating the impotence of those who did that to me. In the context of a dictionary, potency doesn’t convey good or bad. Potency is not moral, political or sociological, it just means power, including power to destroy. Evil is not impotent. You are focused on the result, Rand on the cause. --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Sadly Brant it looks like you may have to build a northern wall due to Trudeau’s contemplation of “a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian” and the possibility of him allowing Isis fighters to return home because they are “tired”. I would be fine with that if they were facing a war crimes tribunal, but sadly such is not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 5 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: Time to pay up, whore. “United States District Judge S. James Otero issued an order and ruling today dismissing Stormy Daniels' defamation lawsuit against President Trump. The ruling also states that the President is entitled to an award of his attorneys' fees against Stormy Daniels. A copy of the ruling is attached. No amount of spin or commentary by Stormy Daniels or her lawyer, Mr. Avenatti, can truthfully characterize today's ruling in any way other than total victory for President Trump and total defeat for Stormy Daniels. The amount of the award for President Trump's attorneys' fees will be determined at a later date.” https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-15/stormy-daniels-lawsuit-dismissed-trump-entitled-legal-fees Jon, Outside of pimps, President Trump is the only man I know of who can get a whore to pay him. Since he's a newly formed politician, maybe it's sumpin to do with feminism, gender equality or sumpin... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 14 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Outside of pimps, President Trump is the only man I know of who can get a whore to pay him. Even more hilarious, how about all those dorks who donated money to Stormy Daniels' GoFundMe campaign for legal expenses? This money will now go to President Trump to pay his lawyers. How cool is that? Thanks, dorks... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Even more hilarious, how about all those dorks who donated money to Stormy Daniels' GoFundMe campaign for legal expenses? This money will now go to President Trump to pay his lawyers. How cool is that? Thanks, dorks... Michael That makes me laugh more than a little bit. Judge K for deciding the damages? Damn that would stir up the libtards into a frenzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 16 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: It is called a hydrological cycle. It snows on the continent and ice cleaves off. This has been going on for billions of years and does not indicate net ice loss. No doubt Lesley has stood riverside contemplating the day it inevitably runs out of water. Yes, and she has probably not only concluded that the one river that she was observing would run out of water, but that globally, all rivers would run out of water, that it was therefore settled science, and that it would be so, so wonderfully lovely if she could only beg and pressure Mr. President to take the issue seriously and agree that Punishments are needed to prevent universal doom. J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Stormy asked for it. She's now in the payoff phase of President Trump's rope-a-dope stratagem. And neither her nor her dorky lawyer saw it coming. What's more, it's going to get worse for them from here. This is Trump territory and his competence is hell on earth for his targets. Let's let the big man say it himself. “Federal Judge throws out Stormy Danials lawsuit versus Trump. Trump is entitled to full legal fees.” @FoxNews Great, now I can go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer in the Great State of Texas. She will confirm the letter she signed! She knows nothing about me, a total con! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 16, 2018 Horseface? LOL... After mushroom dick, how can she complain about that? What's worse, now that you think about it, she does look horsey... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 22 hours ago, Jon Letendre said: It is called a hydrological cycle. It snows on the continent and ice cleaves off. This has been going on for billions of years and does not indicate net ice loss. No doubt Lesley has stood riverside contemplating the day it inevitably runs out of water. These people are so dumb and ignorant they think the ice in their brains will melt because of AGW. If only. --Brant I'd love to tell her the Titanic sank because of CC and watch her run with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/13/2018 at 11:03 AM, Jonathan said: I don't know whom Lenny Peequaff commanded his toads to vote for, if anyone, but, with his long history of retarded political misdiagnosis and backward thinking in his advocacy of parties and candidates, I could easily see him supporting Hillary. Same with Yawon Bwook. Squaresville, Daddy-O. No sense of the reality of the culture, just their 50s-Rand-mimic cloistered theories. J Maybe Lenny Peequaff and his Lilliputian army of toads is capable of such a blasphemy, but I am not so sure. I advocated McCain and Romney over the demon-cratic candidates and I still would. But by now I am even rethinking my support of Ted Cruz over Trump. Nope. I would support Trump now. Let's see; Cruz or Rubio or Poco-haunt-us in 2024? Cruz. Then Rubio. Never Warren. I think I once voted for the Libertarian candidate for Prez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 23 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Jonathan, There's actually a bigger context that is being blanked out. The crowds that show up at events where Trump said those things came out to see him. He was talking about the disruptors (generally paid) of peaceful crowds. Nobody in those crowds came out to see the disruptors. If the disruptors had stayed home, nobody in the peaceful crowds would have even thought about them. As contrast, the Democratic Party MOBS that show up in restaurants, at private homes, etc., are showing up as MOBS precisely to intimidate, threaten, and sometimes commit violence against their targets. Trump gathers peaceful crowds in large venues to see him. The Democratic Party MOBS gather on their own to go and threaten and bust heads of peaceful people going about their normal lives, often in small venues. Huge difference. I don't believe the blanking out of this difference is innocent, either. I think it's on purpose by people who believe in mob violence against innocent people so long as it's their mob and they have a political beef with the target. Michael Protesting a man eating his dinner can quickly escalate to terroristic threatening. I say "book'em Dano and fine them." Jail them for a second offence for 30 days. For a third offense, one year in federal prison or even better, pay the local county lock up to take them in for a bunk and three squares a day. And lots of rotating friends/bunk mates. OH, no! Does that mean terrorist moms will be separated from their kids? Pooh on the kids. Who will cash mom's welfare or George Soro's check? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Horseface? LOL... After mushroom dick, how can she complain about that? What's worse, now that you think about it, she does look horsey... Michael Comedy writers everywhere are straining against their deadlines today to produce memorable material that evokes the idea that she's used to pornstars who are hung like horses, so intercourse between her the Donald was like tossing a hot dog (or a mushroom) down a hallway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 12 hours ago, 9thdoctor said: Comedy writers everywhere are straining against their deadlines today... Dennis, I haven't seen any so far, so culture-wise, this is probably the equivalent of an inside joke for anti-Trumpers. Stormy said something about a small penis, but then she accused Trump of bestiality and blew her own put-down. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 4 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Dennis, I haven't seen any so far, so culture-wise, this is probably the equivalent of an inside joke for anti-Trumpers. Stormy said something about a small penis, but then she accused Trump of bestiality and blew her own put-down. Michael And the bestiality comment is a good setup for Trump. Will he take advantage of it? "Bestiality? Okay, ya got me there. After all, I did have an encounter with horseface. That counts as bestiality, right? Yeah, I think it does." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 (edited) Mr Thompson and the Fake News ... read the transcript of AP’s interview 22 hours ago, 'Sick and disgusting, gaslighting, mentally ill narcissist pig' said: It is called a hydrological cycle. It snows on the continent and ice cleaves off. This has been going on for billions of years and does not indicate net ice loss. Edited October 17, 2018 by william.scherk img code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 21 hours ago, Peter said: Maybe Lenny Peequaff and his Lilliputian army of toads is capable of such a blasphemy, but I am not so sure. Lenny has always feared the Christians more than anyone. He sees them as the biggest threat. President Lizzy "1/1024" Warren could take all of Lenny's inherited retirement fund via new taxes, waterboard him to force him to tell her where he has hidden a few extra bucks and some MREs, and he might still order his toads to vote for her out of the fear that the Christian Right was amassing with the goal of forcing him to go to church. J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Trump: Federal Reserve is my biggest threat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now