Jon Letendre

Banned
  • Posts

    4,414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    82

Everything posted by Jon Letendre

  1. I'm making a sign for my front door right now: It would be immoral of you to come through this door uninvited to scream at me in my living room, but don't worry, I will be the big person, I will not punch you or do anything else to you. I would never violate your right to free speech. Thanks!!!
  2. Above all, never say, "Come through my door to practice your right to speech in my living room, and I will pay the legal fees of any of my friends who punch you." Dont say anything like that. It's an incitement to violence in some minds.
  3. Jonathan, you are setting a very negative tone. You know what could happen next if you keep this up. You know Roger's considered opinion of situations like this. You won't be the victim if you keep this up, knowing as you do what might happen next.
  4. And I don't see Rogers posts. He has been on ignore since he informed that words justify violence. I don't want to say the wrong thing to him, so I'm playing safe.
  5. I'm talking the fuck about how I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to Mark, about Harry. Figure it out or just shut up now, please.
  6. Not you. Harry. And yes, really. He sounds like a dopey simpleton in that comment, or a very young person. Whatever the version, I've seen many, they go,like this... "made all his money from eminent domain" "inherited all his money" "didn't do quite as well as the S&P500 over the comparable 30 year period" The last one is my favorite, because it fails to appreciate the difficulty of deploying vast sums of capital into the real world, not securities traded from the couch, but instead land, and millions of dollars of concrete coming Tuesday, and thirty million dollar window orders, etc., without losing all of it, let alone gain and gain and gain, decade after decade. To do anywhere near the S&P500 with whatever Daddy left 'ya, again, with real world projects, is phenomenal. So, all those simplistic reductions of the man are silly, they sound to me like the way third graders grasp the world.
  7. Well done, Mark. Harry is goofy. That's rather how a third grader would put the story together, isn't it?... <<<Gosh, I guess from what people are saying, it was eminent domain. I think I understand how he did it too. Trump took away old ladies homes, then more of them, then more of them, until he had billions of dollars. Oh, and he focused on greed and left his decency behind. Those two, plus eminent domain = billions of dollars. That's all there is to doing what Trump has done. Anyone can do it.>>>
  8. Republican leadership, donors, elites, some 60 planes, they met on Sea Island off Georgia a week or two ago to conspire to thwart the will of the voters. Dirty tricks coming. Piece of Shit Mitt.
  9. Thank god this country avoided nominating the Sea Island fuckers' brilliant idea, the ready-to-capitulate-to-leftist-violence-lest-we-appear-angry, weak-willed, mopey, dopey loser, Rubio: "And everyone just goes around saying I'm going to speak my mind, and if I'm angry I'm going to say or do anything I want. Well there are other people that are angry too. And if they speak out too and say whatever they want, the result is called chaos, it is called anarchy. And that is what we are careening towards in the political process." http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/03/12/rubio_obama_has_used_divisive_language_too_i_admit_but_hes_never_said_to_beat_somebody_up.html
  10. Trump assured that Christian persecution will stop and Christians will feel that their voices are heard. He promised to bring it up a lot. And to make saying Merry Christmas ok again. So obviously, watch soon for deeply, deeply sincere concerns about a Trump Christian Theocracy...
  11. David Horowitz: The mob that came to disrupt the Trump rally in Chicago was neither spontaneous nor innocent, nor new. It was a mob that has been forming ever since the Seattle riots against the World Trade Organization in 1999, whose target was global capitalism. The Seattle rioters repeated their outrages for the next two years and then transformed itself into the so-called “anti-war” movement to save the Saddam dictatorship in Iraq. Same leaders, funders and troops. The enemy was always America and its Republican defenders. When Obama invaded countries and blew up families in Muslim countries, there was no anti-war movement because Obama was one of them, and they didn’t want to divide their support. In 2012 the so-called “anti-war” movement reformed as “Occupy Wall Street.” They went on a rampage creating cross-country riots to protesting the One Percent and provided a whipping boy for Obama’s re-election campaign. Same leaders, same funders and troops. In 2015 the same leftwing forces created and funded Black Lives Matter and lynch mobs in Ferguson and Baltimore who targeted “white supremacists” and police. Behind all the mobs was the organized left – MoveOn.org, the public sector unions run by Sixties leftovers, and the cabal of anti-American billionaires led by George Soros. The mobs themselves were composed of the hate-filled foot soldiers of the political left. Now these forces have gathered in the campaign to elect the Vermont communist and are focusing their venom on Donald Trump. The obvious plan is to make Republicans toxic while driving a wedge through the Republican Party. The plan is defeat Republicans in November so that the destructive forces they have set in motion in the Democratic Party can finish the wrecking job that Obama started. One of the professionally produced signs at the Chicago mob scene proclaimed, “This is what democracy looks like.” Actually it is exactly what fascism looks like. As every student of the Thirties knows, the breakup of democratic forums by Nazi and Communist thugs paved the way for Hitler’s election. Just like the mobs of the Thirties, today’s left is driven by racial and class hate, and is utterly contemptuous of the democratic process – hence the effort to hang the Ferguson cop before the trial and to prevent Trump from expounding his views in Chicago. And what has been the reaction of the presidential candidates, particularly those who propose to save the country? It is to blame Trump as though he and not the left had instigated the riot. If you play with matches like Trump did, opined Hillary Clinton, you’re likely to start a fire. This is the same Hillary Clinton who has compared Republicans to terrorists and called them racists, and who once accused a “vast right-wing conspiracy” of inventing her husband’s paramour. The Democratic Party has officially endorsed the Black Lives Matter racists and rioters. But it is not only the left who is attempting to blame Trump for the Chicago debacle. According to the proudly positive John Kasich, it was Trump who created the “toxic environment” that led to the riot – not the fascist movement that has been metastasizing in our universities and streets for more than a decade. In other words, when you finally go on the attack, attack a Republican rather than a Democrat. That way you get a pass. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz and their spokespeople piled on Trump as well. “Ted Cruz Claims Trump Is To Blame For Violence At His Rallies,” ran a headline in the leftwing New York Times. His Republican attackers attempted to shame Trump for speaking to the anger of his conservative supporters instead of bringing everyone together – those who claim we live in a white supremacist society and the whites they are attacking, those who claim that Republicans are terrorists and racists and the victims of this abuse. As though you can create unity with people who hate you because you are white or rich, or believe that America is a nation worth saving. The fact is that Trump’s anger is pretty controlled, considering the hate-filled environment of Islamic terrorists, illegal immigrants, event disrupters and rival candidates openly smearing him. He is often guilty of over-reach – “punch him in the nose” directed at one disrupter, but this is hardly the sin his detractors suggest in comparing him to Mussolini. That is a much great violence to the man who is its target. Aside from Trump’s compulsive over-reach what is wrong with anger in the current political context? Is it wrong to be angry at what Obama and the Democrats and the progressive mobs are doing to our country? How is this dissociation from Trump mob attack not the same surrender to political correctness that conservatives like Rubio and Cruz claim to reject? Aren’t Cruz and Rubio angry at what is being done to our country? Why are they willing to validate the hypocritical slanders of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, two architects of our disasters? This is the reality we must never forget: There is an anti-American radical in the White House who – with the support of his party – has delivered nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and a hundred billion dollars to our mortal enemies in Teheran who have declared their intentions to kill us. This suicidal deal was not an oversight, as Rubio has correctly observed, but the result of decades of thinking that America and Israel are adversaries, and our enemies are their victims. The extremists of #Never Trump exemplify the malaise Republicans have been prisoners of for years, which is what the primary revolt is about. Why was there no #Never Obama movement in 2012? For Republicans such a movement would be unthinkable. It would be too angry. It would be called racist. On the other hand, no one will call us racist for attacking a fellow Republican. So let’s join the left in smearing one of our own and hope that we can scrub off the stigmas that Democrats have tarred us with in the process. We’re not racists. Let’s not fight Obama, which will prove that we are. Let’s have respectful words for the lynch mob left. If we capitulate the disaster unfolding before us, maybe it will go away. That is what the Trump crowd is angry about and mainstream Republicans should be too. At the outset of the presidential debates all the Republican candidates pledged to support the party’s choice in November. Extra pressure was put on Trump to do so and he did. But now that millions of Republicans have cast their ballots for Trump, Rubio and Kasich are threatening to renege on their pledge, and destroy both the party and the country in the process. And Cruz, while sniping at Trump’s alleged role in inciting the leftists is notably non-committal about whether he will support a Trump primary victory. None of them explain how you can fight fascist leftists without actually fighting them and opening yourself to the charge of anger. Perhaps it is money from the #Never Trump crowd – the extremists who want to thwart the popular vote and fatally split the party - that is behind this perfidy. But as someone who until very recently held high opinions of Rubio and Cruz, I am hoping that it is not too late for somebody to wake them up. I am hoping that somebody says: Cut it out. Come to your senses. Your scorched earth warfare is threatening the very existence of the right. Trump isn’t the enemy. Like you he is opposed to the Iran deal, supports a secure border, recognizes the Islamist threat, wants to reduce taxes and make the country solvent, and is greatly expanding the Republican base. Attempt to beat him at the polls if you think he shouldn’t be president but let the voters decide the result, and respect their decision. The alternative is a fratricidal war that could drive large numbers of conservatives away from the polls, and whose beneficiaries will only be America’s enemies at home and abroad. David Horowitz is the founder of the Horowitz Freedom Center and the author of, among many others, The Black Book of the American Left, a multi-volume collection of his conservative writings. His next book, Progressive Racism, will be published by Encounter Books in March, 2016. The Freedom Center is a 501c3 non-profit organization. Therefore we do not endorse political candidates either in primary or general elections. However, as defenders of America’s social contract, we insist that the rules laid down by both parties at the outset of campaigns be respected, and that the results be decided by free elections. We will oppose any attempt to rig the system and deny voters of either party their constitutional right to elect candidates of their choice. http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/horowitz-how-not-fight-our-enemies
  12. Yes, a great success. Just like Friday evening. "We won! We stopped Trump!" Ideologically similar, and delusionaly similar, too.
  13. Well, you see, Adam, the SJWs don't have free will. Tell them you will punch them if they trespass and violate your speech rights, why, you are basically forcing them to throw bottles at police. Just like Hebdo killers. You know what they're going to do if you draw, so don't try to deny the logical and psychological connection between drawings and killings. It is very well understood connection.
  14. Kasich has been out there saying Trump's words cause violence, so it's all on Trump. Kasich can go fuck himself. He deserves zero consideration.
  15. I would be very surprised. Ted went off tonight, placing blame on Trump instead of those who came to violate free speech. "The tone he has set" and such. He sounded just like a terror apologist pointing out that so and so KNEW drawing Mohamad was forbidden. I don't think he will ever get near a Trump administration. Ben will, but I don't know about VP. He will be great this year. He was great tonight. He can say things Trump should not. The calm, measured, black, brain mechanic is going to reassure that Trump is going to be ok. Ben will bring yet more people in.
  16. Ted has an important role in the Senate. Ted can not win the White House. That's why shitbag Lindsey 'no one would mind if Ted was murdered on the Senate floor' Graham and the other establishment shitbags recommend him.
  17. Their mayor covers up and protects police that murder teens so they... set out to destroy Trump's right to speech. Makes sense, it's not like they can do a damn thing about the Democratic, Obama-pal mayor.
  18. Funny you say that. For over a year I have feared a terrible terrorist attack in October 2016 that would require a temporary postponement of the election. Obama: "...until such time as we can figure out what the hell is going on!"
  19. Actually, you are free to take credit for persuading me, early. I've read only a small fraction, but have followed this thread since July. I had many of the same doubts about Trump as others have. I would come back, read a page or two, and quickly become embarrassed at the doubt, the flimsy, silly, stupid, specific doubt I had entertained. By fall I was totally persuaded you had most of it more or less exactly right.
  20. Formal surrenders and more endorsements coming Wednesday.
  21. Did anyone else notice the defeated and dejected pussies' informal surrender?