Reidy

Members
  • Posts

    1,723
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Reidy

  1. Loeb was a founder of E. F. Hutton and the author of popular investment books. He and Rand both planned in the 1940s to build houses with Wright in Redding CT, but neither went through with it. As an informal financial adviser to Wright he advised him to take the job designing for the movie version of The Fountainhead and chided him over this in later years when he complained about lack of money. He also knew Jack and Harry Warner, who would have been the clients for the job, having helped to take the studio public.

    The quote comes from Letters p. 154.

  2. While I'm not a heavy-duty student of the topic, I've enjoyed the writings of Hubert Dreyfus (What Computers Can't Do and Mind Over Machine) and The Improbable Machine by Jeremy Campbell. They treat AI as a case of rationalism, the mistaken attempt to treat all intellectual activity as rule-bound deduction. Campbell draws an explicit analogy to Hayek on this point, digital AI being the counterpart of centralized economic planning.

    Dreyfus allows that formal calculation can simulate the real thing ever more skillfully but still argues that such simulation won't amount to human reason. Software is much better at this than it was when he wrote, but I suspect I'd still agree with him if I were to revisit the question.

    • Like 1
  3. 1. Somebody other than Branden, perhaps not a member of the collective at all; not my burden of proof.

    2. Don't remember.

    I wonder if the industrialist Mr. X mentions was the Bogart character in Sabrina. The problem is that it would have been a current movie at the time, not an oldie.

  4. He's not NB, even allowing that Rand may have changed minor details for confidentiality. Mr. X was in therapy, and he suffered what appears to be chronic depression. Branden in his twenties had no romantic failures behind him. He was married to his first serious partner and - well, you know the rest. Those major features eliminate him. Mr. X was probably someone in the inner circle, though, given that she was willing to spend time with him. I've heard that they were all Branden's patients at one time or another. I've never heard of any of them being an engineer, and I don't know how old they were when they met her (NB was nineteen and making a career in psychology; those count as minor details). For that matter Mr. X may have been a woman.

    I don't see that it's a coincidence. She was writing an accurate-enough account of someone she'd known.

  5. My hunch is that the name-change remark is a version of the discredited Ben-Rand story that's been knocking around for decades. (It's at least as old as Nora Ephron's 1968 article in the NYT Sunday book review.) The reporter, guessing goes, wasn't quite confident enough go into print with that one, and this is what's left.

  6. This strikes me as silly. Branden was a niche figure, popular with the (non-orthodox) Objectivist audience and with the pop-psych audience. He was not newsworthy in his own right even when he was turning out new books and publicizing them personally. A test of the present claim would be to see how the media handled his public doings and sayings on days when ARI did not issue press releases. Short answer: they didn't handle them.



    It cuts both ways in any case. Alan Gotthelf belongs in Objectivist history for his part in bringing Rand into the academic big time. He co-founded and for many years chaired the ARS/APA and edited its anthologies. TAS cites him on several occasions but didn't note his death.



    My guess is that ARI issued the press release to coincide with the publishers' settling on a cover design.

  7. Progress is the result of the activities of the intellectual and moral elite -- not the masses. The massman seems to be permanently ignorant and depraved: a kind of low animal usually given over to the lowest common denominator. By themselves they seem doomed, and like they deserve this fate.

    Sounds like Jonathan Gruber without the PowerPoints, and about as credible.

  8. More testimony to Rand's irascibility comes from John Hospers, with whom she was friendly ca. 1960: http://johnhospers.com/Articles/Conversations2.html (do a text search on "Aesthetics" and read his account of her behavior at an academic conference).

    As Nerian mentions, there's another side of the story, which we get from Peikoff, Valliant and others. One reason I'm inclined to be skeptical of them is that the people who say that she could be unreasonably angry are evenhanded and enormously respectful of Rand - NB, BB, Hospers and others. The Peikoff/Valliant circle, by contrast, are capable only of badmouthing anybody who crosses them.