You've routinely mentioned the connection between Husayni's ties to Axis powers and the fate of Israelis and Palestinians. I find the connection you imply overblown honestly. While its no secret Husayni was an evil man who did his best to corrupt Islam with Nazi ideology its practical effect was limited. I think it also distracts from the actual causes of the unrest in 47-8, causes still at work today. When I look at the actual practical effects of Husayni's Nazism on the Palestinian population it is very, very limited. I do not know the circulation of Husayni's propaganda in Palestine but I know he was heavily opposed by the people. The Nashabishi and other tribes resented his dictatorship, even going as far as accepting negotiation with Zionism. Husayni's crown achievement - outside of raising a small army to attack Arab Muslim targets in Egypt, Transjordan and Iraq - was raising a small Balkan army for the Axis powers. Not a Palestinian "SS" but a Balkan one. Keep in mind at this point in the war the SS was not really the Nordic, Pagan society but a State on its own with Arab, French and even Slavic units. An adherence to Nazi ideology was not nearly as relevant as more guns on the battlefield. Husayni was also sidelined in the Palestinian movement when the war broke out. Show me leaders in Arab Salvation Army, Arab League, or Islamic clergy at the time expressing ideas with clear roots in Nazism as opposed to Arab Socialism or Islam and I will reevaluate my opinion. Not only, IMHO, was Husayni's Nazism irrelevant but it masks his blame in crucial respects. Its widely known that Palestine is not burdened by a glut of competent leadership. What is not widely known is Husayni is largely the problem's cause. In the 20's Husayni had the option of forming an Arab Agency, parallel to the Jewish Agency, under British supervision. The Jews had successfully built up trade unions, postal services, health care, political parties and even an army through the Jewish Agency. Husayni refused the offer, his national pride would not give an inch. As a result the Palestinian class most needed to form a government - the doctors, lawyers, teachers and so on - were forced to be British employees. When the British pulled out this class - a full one hundred thousand - moved to Egyptian, Syrian, Jordanian and Iraqi labor markets. Palestine was effectively decapitated by Husayni's pride before a shot had been fired by the Jews. The long term damage this caused is obvious. 60 years after the war Palestine is just beginning to develop democratic institutions plagued by corruption, tribal conflicts and an underdeveloped economy. As the board anti-zionist I also believe the emphasis on Husayni's Nazism distracts from the real grievances of the Palestinians which fueled both the Nakba and the current conflicts. The Zionists displaced and thus angered the Palestinian Fellahin. They had been made homeless - by the Hundreds of Thousands - through Jewish land purchases of dubious legitimacy. Unable to integrate into an intentionally designed racist labor market in the Yishuv the Palestinians were left without a political solution (thanks to Husayni). You do not need Nazism to explain a violent resistance which predates Hitler by decades. This same economic displacement continued through the Occupation. It was illegal for Palestinians to set up a wide variety of businesses, constant embargoes made any trade difficult forcing the Arabs to become cheap labor for Israel. This continues today with a system of check points, routine land and resource expropriation, and trade embargoes. I fail to see how Nazism is required to explain the Palestinian reaction.