Save us from inauthentic behavior, Zuck! 

When will they make Pence President, Shit-for-Brains?

19 hours ago, Jon Letendre said:

What?

People who spend so much time and effort scoffing at a coming sekrit awakening seem to miss a larger point , the boat is already sailing.

I’m ambivalent, agnostic as to the flesh and bone personage of Q, but if I got  on knees before I lay me down to sleep , I’d ask for blessing and long living to Q.

5 hours ago, tmj said:

People who spend so much time and effort scoffing at a coming sekrit awakening seem to miss a larger point , the boat is already sailing.

I’m ambivalent, agnostic as to the flesh and bone personage of Q, but if I got  on knees before I lay me down to sleep , I’d ask for blessing and long living to Q.

Now I see, thank you. 

"When I woke up from my dream, there were many questions  ..."  Tell me how much time you spend on Twitter, while doing your Q-Level work. Don't your co-workers ever wonder why your work-product is so slap-dash?

Something big is always coming. Just ask Manafort, Gates, Flynn and Stone. Oh, and 'trust Sessions,' 'disinformation is necessary,' and 'trust Huber.' For the republic.

On 12/21/2019 at 6:56 AM, tmj said:

People who spend so much time and effort scoffing at a coming sekrit awakening seem to miss a larger point , the boat is already sailing.

I’m ambivalent, agnostic as to the flesh and bone personage of Q, but if I got  on knees before I lay me down to sleep , I’d ask for blessing and long living to Q.

He acts like someone who knows this Q stuff eventually leads to him.

"I don't want EGGROLL, I want INDICTMENTS" ...

"Let Mr Nunes know ..."

I just looked at your Twitter. You don’t speak much at all anywhere in your own voice, do you? Just reposting other people, like at OL. Very safe. Can’t be quoted. Can’t be shown to have been wrong if you never say what you think about anything or answer any questions here, at your climate blog or anywhere else. But the downside is you are disappearing. You are becoming a ‘bot that repeats the 4am memo, the Deep State narrative. Generic faceless leftie loser. Tens of millions of those. Not very interesting.

Egg roll? I want sweet and sour pork and pork fried rice too.

Murry Qristmas Errabody!

Merry Christmas William, and to everyone on OL It is a good night.

Here's a little Xmas present for William.

Jokes aside, Merry Christmas.

Michael

This speaks for itself.

Trump just retweeted a 'QAnon' conspiracy-theory hashtag to his 68 million followers

It's hard to play the denial-by-featuring-goofy-fringe-folks game when the president himself does the Q stuff this blatantly.

Michael

"Q" is on a tear about supposed shenanigans in the March primary elections in California ... "Q" is not a top-level analyst.

DemocRats in California are violating the civil rights of their citizens and countless election laws.

Forcing of extra steps, jumping through hoops, to register as Republican is just one example.

They know who wins if they do not cheat in every possible way.

13 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

"Q" is not a top-level analyst.

And you are the expert who would know?

Were you told in a dream?

Intuition?

If you could support this assertion you would, but you cannot support anything you assert these days. Just drive-bys. So intellectual. Shit-for-Brains. Loser.

23 hours ago, william.scherk said:

the March primary elections in California

From the linked-to article:

Quote

[...] NPP [No Party Preference] voters may vote in a political party's partisan election if the political party, by party rule duly noticed to the Secretary of State, authorizes NPP voters to vote in the next presidential primary election. An NPP voter may request the ballot of one of the political parties, if any, that authorizes NPP voters to vote in the presidential primary election.

The following parties have notified the Secretary of State that they will allow No Party Preference voters to request their party’s presidential ballot in the March 3, 2020, Presidential Primary Election:

American Independent Party
Democratic Party
Libertarian Party

I.e, in California permission has to be given by a political party in order for no-party-preference (NPP) voters to vote in that party's primary.

The California Democratic, Libertarian, and American Independent parties have given permission for NPPs to vote in their primaries.  The California Republican Party has not given permission.

I think that it would be a tactical blunder for the California Republican Party to allow NPPs to vote in its primary.  Non-party-affiliated persons who want Trump defeated would take advantage and would vote in the Republican primary for some candidate other than Trump. 

Ellen

The charges are that election officials in CA are intentionally confusing voters and making registering Republican more difficult than registering Democrat. Both charges are true and have nothing to do with CA Republican Party disallowing non-Republicans from voting in the March primary.

Many non-affiliated voters who receive those mailings will check DemocRat and send it back and this makes them a registered Democrat, unless Newsom signed another new law last night.

Even Californians do not understand their own system, which changes every cycle.

The linked-to article was written by one of the accused.

This is too funny. I'm a fan of Law & Order: SVU, so it is doubly funny.

Ice T gets red-pilled about Q, then about the nastiness of those who are afraid of Q.

Lionel didn't present the event well (but, in his defense, trying to find links right now is a holy mess). His analysis is spot on, though.

Here's what happened. Ice T posted this on Twitter.

Twitter exploded.

How dare you? How dare you? How dare you? 

Outrage... outrage... outrage...

Then this happened.

Here's a little more.

I do not think Ice T is amused.

Michael

If that professor that went on Fox saying “10% of the population thinks Q is a good thing” was anywhere near correct then it spreads like fire from now on.

The Ice T incident is a good example of why and how it takes off once a tipping point like 10% is reached. He didn’t even intend to redpill his millions of followers. Like fire now.

A funny thing happened on the way to the forum. 

Ted Nugent used a Facebook account to -- seemingly -- endorse Q, and then -- seemingly -- reversed the seeming endorsement, and used pretty strong language to denounce a few items.

This came to a boil just after a Trump2020 campaign actor denounced Q.

Whoever or whatever "Q" is, he or she or they are probably enjoying the break, not having posted since December 29 2019.  This break has had zero effect on propagation of the 'cleaned-up' version of the mighty conspiracy-of-all-conspiracies ... from Mike Rothschild:

The article is here.

As "Q" might say, The 'silent' war continues.