Ellen Stuttle

Members
  • Posts

    7,080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

Ellen Stuttle last won the day on February 8 2023

Ellen Stuttle had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Ellen Stuttle

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Psychology, Physics, Philosophy, Literature, Music

Recent Profile Visitors

19,172 profile views

Ellen Stuttle's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

553

Reputation

  1. I’m having a peculiar reaction to some extra-strong dilating stuff that was used at the clinic Tuesday so pictures of the retinas could be taken. The stuff is being pokey slow wearing off. I can just barely discern text now but not well enough for posting anything complicated. Ellen
  2. I'll second that. I’m currently working on an attempt to unsnarl the tangles of terminology and classification from the recent series. Stay tuned. I might get stuff posted later today or tomorrow. If not by then, not till Wednesday. Left eye injection day on Tuesday. Ellen
  3. Michael, you wrote: "I would especially like to avoid having to write about things like your last comment in my quote above. I do not refer to mRNA packets as "little manufacturing plants." I refer to mRNA packets that have been absorbed and interacting with the body at specific points like in cells around capillaries as "little manufacturing plants." "Another thing. I have never said the jabs are injected into the bloodstream instead of muscles. I myself made a "curse of knowledge" assumption that injection into muscles was understood because I talked about the lymphatic system as the form of conveyance." I'm not being able to get quoting to work from one page to the next page, so I'll just refer you to your post Nov 1 at 6:30 for what I'm referring to with the first (your description is awfully fuzzy, granted) and your post of Nov 4 at 6:08 pm for the second. (See the first sentence of your "Step 2.") Your mind's eye picture is thoroughly a mess. I was trying to help, but I think you like the mess, so I shall leave it be. Ellen
  4. Michael, I’m not sure if you saw my reply to you from Saturday am (linked to above). Maybe you haven’t had time to respond or you lack interest in the subject, especially with midterms looming. Fine, if so. However, while I’m about it, I want to correct another misunderstanding. You refer to the mRNA packets as "little manufacturing plants." The mRNA doesn’t manufacture anything. The ribosomes of the host's cells do the manufacturing. What the mRNA provides is instructions to the ribosomes on how to make the Covid virus's spike proteins. Thus the packets could be thought of as "little instruction manuals." The instruction manuals wouldn’t accomplish anything in the bloodstream, where there aren’t ribosomes to be instructed. So the trick was to get the mRNA into the cells. The molecules are too big and awkwardly shaped to pass through little interstices of the cell membrane. That's where Robert Malone's (unfortunately) ingenious idea came in. His idea was to encase the mRNA (or medicine that couldn’t slip through the membrane) in lipid packets, thus both compressing the shape and providing a smooth surface that would slip through into the cell. (The idea is similar to putting granular medicinal substances into a softgel capsule for ease of swallowing.) The idea was feasible (unfortunately in this case), although there was considerable development between Malone’s demonstrating that the technique could work and the current mRNA Jabs. Ellen
  5. Michael, The mRNA Jabs, like vaccines, are injected into muscle not into the bloodstream. I don’t know what sort of general mental image you have of what molecules look like. Could you provide a link to a picture? Do you have an idea of what a cell looks like? A cell is a lot of (organized) molecules inside a membrane (itself composed of molecules). Please take a look at the images of 4 levels of protein organization at this link and tell me what they do to your mind's eye - drive it nuts? make sense? some of each? https://comis.med.uvm.edu/VIC/coursefiles/MD540/MD540-Protein_Organization_10400_574581210/Protein-org/Protein_Organization_print.html Ellen
  6. TG, I don’t have time for reading the article now. Quick question. What does the study mean by "fraudulent" reporting - classifying as caused by Covid deaths that were actually from some other cause, or fabricating deaths entirely (or maybe a combination)? Ellen
  7. Michael, My sighing is because I don’t know if I can help to give you a "picture" of what's going on with Covid viruses, spike proteins, mRNA Jabs. Maybe if I start here. You wrote (last paragraph of your post): "Oh, hell. I can't resist. In my mind's eye, I see two kinds of doggies running wild, the "packages of messenger RNA" through the lymph system, and the spike proteins they produce once they come into being and before they attach to COVID viruses." Looks like you don’t understand that Covid viruses come equipped with spike proteins as part of their structure (similarly to the normal human body coming equipped with hands as part of its structure). Spike proteins are what give the Corona virus its name - "corona," crown. Here's an NIH report with a transmission electron microscope image. Novel coronavirus structure reveals targets for vaccines and WWW.NIH.GOV Researchers produced a detailed picture of the part of SARS-CoV-2—the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19—that allows it to infect human cells. The fuzzy aura around the viruses is comprised of the spikes. As the article says, the spike proteins are what allow the virus to enter a host cell: "Like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 particles are spherical and have proteins called spikes protruding from their surface. These spikes latch onto human cells, then undergo a structural change that allows the viral membrane to fuse with the cell membrane. The viral genes can then enter the host cell to be copied, producing more viruses." The spike proteins are also what triggers the immune system of the host to start producing counteractive antibodies. The idea with the mRNA stuff was to inject into human cells part of the instruction code from the Covid virus, the part which directs production of the spike proteins. The immune system was then supposed to go on alert against the foreign protein and produce antibodies, therefore making the person pre-geared (battle equipment already at the ready) if the person was infected by Covid. But things didn’t proceed like they were supposed to. Instead of staying at the locus of the injection, the manufactured spike proteins went roaming here, there, and elsewhere in the body, fastening onto the body's cells (as in the vascular endothelium) and generally getting the immune system of the recipient messed up so that it started identifying one's own cells as foreign bodies to be attacked (as I said before, in effect producing an auto-immune disorder). So…. I hope that helps with clarifying. Ellen
  8. "long covid": https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html As I suspected, more deception from the Jabbers. Ellen
  9. But then it isn’t part of the virus. See my post to Michael. Ellen
  10. Michael, sigh……. Right, the spike proteins from the mRNA injections DO run around the body like a dog off the leash (metaphorically speaking). The spike protein of a corona virus DOES NOT do that. It's part of the virus, not detached. SL spoke of dangers from spike proteins, whether from the injections or from the virus. There isn’t the danger with spike proteins from the virus. All those do is give the virus entry into a cell. Ellen
  11. Where is the idea of "long covid… and spike proteins in general" coming from? Is that some sort of new attempted defense by Jabbers? The spike protein of a corona virus is part of the virus. It doesn’t roam around the body like a dog off the leash causing mischief here and there. Ellen
  12. Yeah, that's what I was thinking. It’s going to be very difficult to find out. Ellen
  13. Michael (and Marc), The figure I was actually wondering about there in speaking of "the number of hospitalizations" is the total number, including hospitalizations either correctly or incorrectly diagnosed as Covid cases which didn’t result in death. I.e., how many people lived to tell of the hospitalizations? What percentage of hospitalizations resulted in death? Ellen
  14. "Not safe from contracting Covid, safe from any adverse consequences." And you wouldn’t be safe from contracting Covid, or at any less risk from contracting Covid, if you did get "the Vax." (I know that you know that, just emphasizing that all the Jabs do for a person is put the person at risk of adverse reactions. No benefit conferred.) Ellen
  15. You're right about the Nazis keeping excellent records. However, from what I find in studying the CDC material on figures, record-keeping by US hospitals and clinics during the Covid brouhaha has been disorganized and the CDC themselves don’t have good estimates of the number of hospitalizations. There does have to be a paper trail with CARES and insurance payments, but tracking the trail won’t be easy. Ellen