DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office... and:

[galtgulch]

THis article appeared in the Canadian Free Press:

Here is the link:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/22221

<<<"

The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office

By JB Williams Saturday, April 24, 2010

Members from all three branches of the Federal government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds. (See JB’s new article on The Bottom Line on Natural Born Citizen)

What they don’t know is how long it will take for most Americans to figure it out, or what to do about it.

The diversionary search for an authentic birth certificate is ongoing and Obama has now spent in excess of $2 million in legal fees to keep that search alive.

Eric Holder’s Department of Justice continues to deploy taxpayer funded attorneys around the country to file dismissals on behalf of Obama, denying all American citizens access to the courts as a peaceful remedy, which only fuels the fire of discontent and the questions about Obama persist.

Michelle Obama states that Kenya is Barack’s “home country.” She knows, after twenty years with Barack. The Ambassador or Kenya has confirmed the same His family friends all know it, and are in fact quite proud of the fact that Americans had no hesitation in electing a “black man from Kenya” as President of the United States.

The US Supreme Court knows what the constitutional condition of “natural born citizen” means. Even the most far left member of that court, Justice Ginsberg, is on record proclaiming that a “natural born citizen” is a birth child of TWO legal US citizens.

Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible for the office of president, which is why she refused to certify the following language when certifying Obama as the DNC candidate for president in 2008.

This is the normal language for certification of nomination for president and vice president, filed by the DNC only in the state of Hawaii…

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice Preseient of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:"

This is the language filed by the DNC in the other 49 states, however…

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the folowing were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:"

Note that the language which certifies that Barack Hussein Obama meets all constitutional qualifications is missing in the DNC documents filed in 49 of the 50 states. The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president was filed only in Hawaii. That text is missing in the DNC certification filings for all other states.

Whereas the RNC filed the exact same certification document, including the constitutional text for John McCain in all 50 states, Obama was technically certified in only one state, Hawaii. A mere inconvenient technicality, I’m sure…

The US Congress knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not constitutionally qualified for the office he holds. Although the congress passed a resolution proclaiming Senator John McCain a “natural born citizen” as the son of two US citizens, no such congressional resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama.

The press knows that Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” having written on several occasions about the “Kenyan born” senator from Chicago. A number of citizens have already been arrested and jailed for asking these questions.

Over four-hundred law suits have been filed across the country asking the courts to force Obama to become the “transparent president” he promised to be, and all four-hundred are being dismissed before discovery, all on the basis that “no citizen has proper legal standing” to ask who and what their president really is…

Over a half-million citizens have now signed a petition demanding to see Obama’s birth records.

Numerous members of the US Military have refused deployment orders from Obama, on the basis that he refuses to evidence his constitutional qualifications to issue such orders. In most cases, the soldiers have simply been reassigned, so as to avoid any disciplinary action that could end in “defense discovery” which might finally force Obama to open up his files once and for all.

Now an eighteen year veteran flight surgeon and active Lt. Colonel faces court martial as he makes his demands for proof that Obama is constitutionally eligible to issue orders as Commander-in-Chief.

Obama’s entire domestic, foreign and national defense agenda has proven to be wholly anti-American

Obama’s entire domestic, foreign and national defense agenda has proven to be wholly anti-American on every possible level. Still, the answers concerning who and what Barack Hussein Obama Jr. really is remain elusive in the face of unprecedented efforts to ask the right questions.

No matter who asks, how they ask or where they ask, not one single individual in Washington DC or even state government seems willing to weigh in on the most important issue of our era. Who and what is the man sitting in the people’s White House?

How in the hell did we get an overtly anti-American resident of the people’s White House without so much as a simple birth certificate to prove who this person really is?

And why won’t a single elected representative of the people engage in the effort to force an answer to this question?

The answers to these and many more questions are likely very simple and equally chilling…

The Speaker of the House does not refuse to certify her candidate as “constitutionally qualified” in forty-nine of fifty states by accident

Nobody spends $2 million in legal fees to hide an authentic birth certificate. The Speaker of the House does not refuse to certify her candidate as “constitutionally qualified” in forty-nine of fifty states by accident. A press that knew he was the “first Kenyan born senator” didn’t forget that he was Kenyan born when he decided to run for president.

Most importantly, the people DO have a right (read - proper standing) to ask who and what their president really is, in any court, any time. And soldiers are court-martialed for refusing orders, unless those orders were issued by an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief.

DC knows what most Americans have yet to figure out…

Obama is NOT a natural born citizen no matter where he might have been born. Obama’s birth father was at no time an American citizen and on this basis alone, Obama cannot be a constitutionally qualified resident of the White House.

They know something else that the American people have yet to figure out…

The US Constitution no longer stands as the governing law of this land. Obama’s many unconstitutional policies, Czars, executive orders and statements provide the proof, and the fact that nobody in DC cares whether or not Obama is constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States should send a shiver down the spine of every red blooded American citizen, no matter their partisan agendas.

The people willing to ask the tough questions are deemed crackpots and conspiracy theorists, racists or bigots. But those tough questions should be obvious questions to all Americans and every president should have to answer those questions, no matter race, creed, color or party affiliation.

I fear that those questions will only be answered at the tip of pitch forks and torches one day. Sooner or later, the people will run out of patience with a system built to exclude them. When that day comes, I fear what methods will be employed and whether or not there will be a country left to save by then.

But sooner or later, one way or another, Obama will have to answer those questions. One day, the world will know who and what this man is and there will be a day of reckoning like no other in American history.

The longer it takes for that day to arrive, the more dangerous the situation will become. A man not even qualified to hold the office is using that office to destroy the greatest nation on earth. How much patience can the people be expected to display?

Obama is not eligible for the office he currently holds and everyone in a position to know - already know.

What they don’t know is how much longer they can keep it all a secret, or what will happen next.">>>

And here is a more definitive discussion of the issue:

<<<"Not "native" or "naturalized" or "citizen," but only "natural born" citizens can hold the office of president.

The Bottom Line on Natural Born Citizen

By JB Williams Wednesday, April 21, 2010

I write this follow up in response to reader mail regarding my column DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office. Even many conservative columnists and pundits seem confused on the issue of natural born citizen, even though the matter is really quite clear.

History answers the question of what “natural born citizen” means, and leaves NO wiggle room for debate or wishful agenda-driven interpretations.

The term was first used by the British Royal family. The question at the time was how to keep the Royal bloodline intact when members of the Royal family traveled abroad extensively, often giving birth to offspring while abroad, therefore bringing the issue of “native born” into question.

Native is a term relative to geography, where a person is at the time of birth. This issue came up as a challenge to John McCain during his 2008 bid for the White House, as he was born “off base” at a local hospital in Panama while his father was stationed on a Navy base in Panama.

As a diversionary tactic to lead obvious questions away from Barack Hussein Obama, some challenged McCain’s “natural born” status as a presidential candidate on the basis that he was not “native born” on US soil, or on US territory, the US Naval Base in Panama. Congress, therefore, passed a resolution proclaiming McCain a “natural born citizen” on the basis that he was the “natural born” son of two US citizens, more specifically, the natural born son of a US Naval Commander.

However, no such resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama, and here’s why;

The term “native” relates to the geographic location of birth. But the term “natural” relates to the “laws of natural,” ergo family lineage or the bloodline of the father.

The term “natural born citizen” next appears in the Law of Nations, a treaty between nations which established certain universal standards, one of which being the term “natural born citizen.”

The related passage from Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations reads as follows;

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

Note the following text—“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

Further clarification—“The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;”

And the final blow to Barack Hussein Obama—“I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

The subject of “natural law” found in the Law of Nations is entirely consistent with the Royal British purpose of the term “natural born citizen.” It keeps the family bloodline intact on the basis of the father’s blood, aka “natural law.” It is the source from which our nation’s Founding Fathers entered those words into the US Constitution, under Article II—Section I—Clause V;

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”

Not “native” or “naturalized” or “citizen,” but only “natural born” citizens can hold the office of president.

The matter is quite clear and it is on this basis that I have written that John Sidney McCain is indeed a “natural born citizen” of the United States, and the Barack Hussein Obama is not, no matter where in the world he might have been born.

A Hawaiian birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama solves nothing, other than curiosity. A “certification of live birth” means even less, as it only confirms that a child was indeed “born live”—with no reference as to where that birth took place, or who attended or witnessed that birth.

Some argue that the XIV Amendment altered the meaning of the term “natural born citizen.”

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States;” However, the XIV Amendment makes no mention of “natural born citizen” as it was written to address issues of “immigration” and “naturalization,”—which excludes any redress regarding “native” or “natural born” citizens of the Unites States. In short, “natural born” is the exact opposite of “naturalized.” They are two completely different subjects and as we know, “naturalized citizens” cannot hold the office of President, though they are indeed “citizens” with otherwise equal rights. As Barack Hussein Obama’s stated birth father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States, but rather a British subject and native citizen of Kenya, it is not possible for Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to be a “natural born citizen” of the United States. It is therefore not possible for Barack Hussein Obama Jr. to be a constitutionally qualified resident of the people’s White House. Does it matter? Does the “will of the people” trump the US Constitution via the outcome of an election which happened as a result of fraud, in which the candidate concealed the fact that he is not a “natural born citizen?”

Only the people can decide…

But I submit to every American the idea that if Article II—Section I of the US Constitution is no longer worthy of protection and preservation, then nothing in that document matters anymore.

If we fail to uphold Article II—Section I of the US Constitution, then we have failed to uphold, protect, preserve or defend any part of the US Constitution or the American way of life.

If the US Constitution no longer stands, then the United States of America no longer stands.

Is there a more pressing issue on the table today?">>>

www.campaignforliberty.com 230,997

Edited April 29, 2010 by galtgulch

[BaalChatzaf]

Utter rot! The courts have certified that he is legit.

Please stop this nonsense. You remind me of Don Quixote tilting with the windmills.

Calm down, and take off that god damn tinfoil hat.

Ba'al Chatzaf

[galtgulch]

Utter rot! The courts have certified that he is legit.

Please stop this nonsense. You remind me of Don Quixote tilting with the windmills.

Calm down, and take off that god damn tinfoil hat.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Ba'al,

Your rant is embarrassing. I thought you might have had more respect for the U.S. Constitution than you exhibit. If the eligibility requirement was considered to be outmoded it should have been amended a long time ago. But as it stands it still holds that to be eligible one must be a "natural born citizen." The Founders stated this for no other office except the Presidency. In those days they wanted to be sure that any child destined to become President would not have divided loyalty by having a parent who was a citizen of another country. Simply enough. As a Constitutional scholar Obama must have realized that he was ineligible but let his power lust cause that realization to be "blanked out." Instead he chose to take advantage of the widespread ignorance and lack of understanding of the issue.

Obama has been forthcoming that his father was a Kenyan therefore a British subject and not an American citizen.

Now we have a Constitutional crisis being ignored. Any legislation signed by our usurper President is unconstitutional. I grant that the Congress is renown for ignoring the Constitution and the Supreme Court justices have become masters of sophistry. Perhaps the Constitutional eligibility requirement can be amended and made retroactive!

As I understand it the Courts have ruled only that no one addressing this issue has been considered to have standing. I wonder if you have a link or reference for your assertion that the Courts have certified his legitimacy as you allege?

I was hoping for a more reasoned reaction rather than your assertions and ad hominem innuendoes. After all Objectivists are known for their advocacy of reason rather than obfuscation of the truth.

galtgulch

www.campaignforliberty.com 231,014

Edited April 29, 2010 by galtgulch

[Chris Grieb]

Gulch; You wonder why no one takes you seriously.

[BaalChatzaf]

It would not matter if Barak Obama is "The Manchurian Candidate" or not. The courts have certified his qualification to hold the office. Every bill he signs will be handled by the courts as proper congressional (statute) law. Every command he gives as Commander in Chief will be obeyed by the officers of the military forces. In short, what you say makes no difference, even if true.

[Brant Gaede]

Basically the media certified him as a bona fide candidate and hence President a long time ago because they wanted him to be President. The media rule this country. He was almost certainly born in Kenya and is possibly a citizen of Indonesia too boot.

Even in the Internet age the media rule. The schools support and maintain the media and government money supports the schools and the government is supported in turn by the media in a virtuous--if you think it's virtuous--circle. It's all about tribal power and power lust and money. The media is overwhelmingly liberal dominated, which is another way of saying progressive dominated and that is in turn a euphemism for fascism.

--Brant

helpless truth--just get out of the way

[galtgulch]

Gulch; You wonder why no one takes you seriously.

Chris,

I think the Supreme Court Justices believe that they are taking the Constitution seriously despite the fact that they are never unanimous in their interpretations and more often than not hold contradictory positions. We all are in the know that there are no contradictions in the universe. Still the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and every politician is sworn under oath to preserve and defend it, whatever that means to them we have yet to be told.

I do think that the Founders themselves were not of one mind. Jefferson was individualistically oriented while Hamilton was certainly a statist.

But the oath is what it is and the meaning of the eligibility requirement that to be eligible one must have been a natural born citizen was understood at the time without the wide disagreement we witness these days. Most ordinary people simply think it means to have been born in this country without regard to ones parents citizenship. Such a person would strictly be an American citizen but not natural born if ones parents were not American citizens. Traditionally it was the fathers citizenship which counted for all in the days when women were treated as if they were no better than furniture.

There are people who do take my word seriously in my daily life and professional life. I don't mind the jibes here but prefer criticism based on reason rather than mere ad hominem nonsense. As I encourage my patients to do when they are disrespected by someone, let your estimate of them go down and your estimate of your own worth remain the same. I think I undoubtedly learned that from Nathaniel Branden.

I wish someone would someday ask Obama himself what his understanding is of the term natural born citizen and if his response does not include ones parents citizenship to confront him on that. Just why did the writers of Article 2 Section 1 make the distinction which did not apply to eligibility for any other office?

I am hopeful that the efforts in over a dozen states now for nullification to squelch this reform bill on health. I have submitted a resolution to the House of Delegates of the medical society to object to its passage on the grounds of its being unconstitutional. No. i did not mention the ineligibility issue.

i admonished them that if they support the individual mandate which is clearly a form of involuntary servitude they may find someday a mandate focused on them. They will find they have no moral leg to stand on in their fight against being coerced if they give their moral approval to forcing mostly young people to buy health insurance or suffer a fine. Otherwise they will be guilty of hypocrisy.

I imagine that the President's response, if too many doctors close their practices and retire, which might threaten availability of services, might be to require that before one can resign or retire a doctor would need to apply for permission to do so or risk substantial fines or imprisonment!

Anyway I warned them in no uncertain terms. The meeting occurs in mid May. It remains to be seen if my resolution is accepted as it would be a late filed one since the passage of the health reform plan happened after the deadline for resolutions.

"Does anybody care? Is anybody out there?" from 1776 voiced by John Adams

Von Mises was personally cheerful but pessimistic regarding the outlook. Despite all his warnings and writings about the nature of money and inflation the printing presses keep rolling faster and faster.

IS anyone here optimistic and if so why?

www.campaignforliberty.com 231,043

[BaalChatzaf]

Basically the media certified him as a bona fide candidate and hence President a long time ago because they wanted him to be President. The media rule this country. He was almost certainly born in Kenya and is possibly a citizen of Indonesia too boot.

Even in the Internet age the media rule. The schools support and maintain the media and government money supports the schools and the government is supported in turn by the media in a virtuous--if you think it's virtuous--circle. It's all about tribal power and power lust and money. The media is overwhelmingly liberal dominated, which is another way of saying progressive dominated and that is in turn a euphemism for fascism.

--Brant

helpless truth--just get out of the way

Blame it on the media if you wish, but it is the judges who have the say. The judges have decided that Lord Obama is our Elected King. The courts have rebuffed every legal challenge to Obama's eligibility.

Ba'al Chatzaf

[Brant Gaede]

Basically the media certified him as a bona fide candidate and hence President a long time ago because they wanted him to be President. The media rule this country. He was almost certainly born in Kenya and is possibly a citizen of Indonesia too boot.

Even in the Internet age the media rule. The schools support and maintain the media and government money supports the schools and the government is supported in turn by the media in a virtuous--if you think it's virtuous--circle. It's all about tribal power and power lust and money. The media is overwhelmingly liberal dominated, which is another way of saying progressive dominated and that is in turn a euphemism for fascism.

--Brant

helpless truth--just get out of the way

Blame it on the media if you wish, but it is the judges who have the say. The judges have decided that Lord Obama is our Elected King. The courts have rebuffed every legal challenge to Obama's eligibility.

Ba'al Chatzaf

The "judges" have been statist pussies ever since FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court over 70 years ago. They just bow in the wind.

--Brant

[BaalChatzaf]

The "judges" have been statist pussies ever since FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court over 70 years ago. They just bow in the wind.

--Brant

Every word a golden drop of truth, but just the same the judges have the say. They have the say even if our liberty is to be sacrificed on the altar of bad laws. Just like Judge Naragansett said in -Atlas Shrugged-. This nation (U.S.A.) has been plagued by bad law since its founding.

Ba'al Chatzaf

[galtgulch]

The "judges" have been statist pussies ever since FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court over 70 years ago. They just bow in the wind.

--Brant

Every word a golden drop of truth, but just the same the judges have the say. They have the say even if our liberty is to be sacrificed on the altar of bad laws. Just like Judge Naragansett said in -Atlas Shrugged-. This nation (U.S.A.) has been plagued by bad law since its founding.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Ba'al,

More ordinary citizens than ever are reading the Constitution for themselves. It brings to mind that once upon a time the Bible was printed in English instead of Latin enabling people to read it for themselves and to make up their own minds.

It may be out of favor for the Congressmen who openly admit that they pay no attention to the Constitution but it is not out of favor with more and more of the people. There is more attention brought to the sophistry engaged in by the Supreme Court as people read the books of Judge Andrew Napolitano.

"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."

—Thomas Jefferson

There is a sea change happening. People who may have been gullible and trusting but who discover that they have been taken advantage of and betrayed by those they believed and trusted will become relentless advocates of their freedom and liberty and of the kind of society which has respect for the rights of individuals, limited government, sound gold and silver backed money, non interventionistic foreign policy and free markets and the rule of law.

There is already a resurgence of interest in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and Lionsgate is going to produce a TV miniseries of Atlas Shrugged before the end of this year. Imagine its effect.

gulch

www.campaignforliberty.com 231,050

www.YALiberty.org

www.fff.org

www.mises.org

www.atlassociety.org

[Chris Grieb]

Like the mosquito in the nudist colony I don't know where to start.

Brant; There were birth announcements in the Hawaiian newspapers of Barrack Obama's birth. A parent can not denounce a child's American citizenship only the child can. Brant; Do you have any evidence that Barrack Obama's mother was ever in Kenya. Even if Obama's mother became a citizen of Indonesia Barrack would have remained a citizen of the US.

It is interesting that this issue apparently first started with strong supporters of Hillary Clinton. This is why the Obama campaign released the birth certificate.

The people who keep talking are suggesting that some plot was concocted that a half black child some fifty years after his birth could run and win the Presidency in 2008. This plot began in 1961. To state the idea is to refute it.

Brant; You are even sillier than Gulch.

Edited April 30, 2010 by Chris Grieb