Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 24, 2009 Share Posted May 24, 2009 Xray,I don't care what you've studied. I'm not impressed with such declarations. When you claim that "multiple definitions" are "contradictions," and that Rand's definitions are "arbitrary" without having even read them, much less understood them, you show clearly that, despite the learning you claim, you either don't know, or refuse to acknowledge, the difference between words and concepts.I almost always lose interest in such a high quantity of communication complications in really easy primary level stuff that I have encountered in our brief exchanges. And I did this time, too. I get it. Your subtext (discerned though your constant repetition and insistence on attributing wrong meanings and pointing to contradictions that do not exist) is "Rand was wrong" at all costs, even when she wasn't.This impasse is bigger than both of us.But do carry on. I personally have to move on to something more productive...Be well and be happy...Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now