Socialism

[Wolf DeVoon]

I am unable to justify government property, state education, or any other form of a commons or commonwealth. The legal issues seem plain.

If property is held in common, it is impossible to litigate. Every current and future member of the collective would be party to a lawsuit and they might all be simultaneously petitioners and respondents, unless an individual member seeks to enjoin or sue everyone else. But legal standing to sue the state is narrowly defined in most jurisdictions. The alleged injury must be personal and unique. If you are similarly situated to other citizens and required to obey laws and pay tax or perform service according to administrative rules that are more or less uniformly applicable to all, then you have no individual standing to sue, comrade.

Every natural person (every living individual human being) is competent to claim the right to liberty -- and numerous law-abiding chumps always end up feeling like slaves. What kind of 'free country' monitors every dollar you earn and spend, regulating and taxing it twice?

Socialist enclaves are destined to stress and infuriate everyone. Nor is it accurate to depict a socialist commune as a family. States and collective institutions are emphatically not families. It is absurd to characterize political leaders and apparachiks as sovereign parents with numerous adopted children, grandchildren, and future generations of minors by definition, none of whom can ever be emanicipated or self-individuated.

The moral crime of brainwashing small kids to deny liberty becomes heinous by claiming that a collective is their perpetual and exclusive moral tutor.

Wolf DeVoon