Jerry Biggers Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Link to an article in the London Telegraph, comparing Ayn Rand's depiction of Starnesville and Detroits economic collapse. Not identical, but some interesting paralells.http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100227375/obamanomics-is-turning-america-into-detroit-ayn-rands-starnesville-come-to-life/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Hougen Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 There are still parts of the country that are growing, so I hope we will escape the fate of Detroit.Darrell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Poor Detroit! I think the Sabres donate some players to them in a gesture of city solidarity. Then Detroit would have real Buffalo Wings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dglgmut Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 It's pretty crucial that Detroit not get bailed out or the rest of the country may soon follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Detroit is going back to a wilderness state. Scary, isn't it? Who would of thought that could happen in America?Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Biggers Posted July 24, 2013 Author Share Posted July 24, 2013 Detroit is going back to a wilderness state. Scary, isn't it? Who would of thought that could happen in America?Ba'al ChatzafI think that there was a novelist who had discussed the causes of America's economic decline, including the auto industry, in an obscure, unremembered novel.Anyway, she was a novelist, not a real Social(ist) Thinker, like John Kenneth Galbraith...Dglgmut:We taxpayers already bailed-out Chrysler in the late 1970s. Lee Iacocca came in, reinvigorated the car manufacturer by transferring much of its industry to Chrysler plants in Canada, and saved Chrysler turning it into the number one auto manufacturer it is today. O.K., so poor Chrysler, it back to the wall by greedy foreign car makers, needed yet another bail-out.If the rest of the country bail-out Detroit (and plenty of near-bankrupt states and municipalities are eager to get in line), who will be left to bail them out? But this is an evil selfish question. As Mr.Thompson said, we must all sacrifice for the Greater Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dglgmut Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 Here's Peter Schiff's video about it from a couple days ago (including a clip of Obama boasting). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Biggers Posted July 26, 2013 Author Share Posted July 26, 2013 Wow! It's a LOT worse than I thought.I am not familiar with Peter Schiff ,but he presents a pretty damning indictment of Detroit!Actually, Schiff's presentation is a lot better than Stossel's "Special" on Fox, last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Hougen Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 At this rate, Detroit will be a ghost town before long. It's hard to imagine a major U.S. city becoming a ghost town. I could imagine the federal government stepping in and bailing it out. But, as Schiff says, that will open the spigot to every state, city, and town being backed by the Feds. Then, the entire country could turn into a ghost country.Darrell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Hmm...One would almost think that it is beginning to look like that crazy ladies novel that was written in 1957...Nah, nothing to see here, move on Johnny...get off the corner and get back to being a subservient producer, so that the parasites can survive for another year, or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Biggers Posted July 27, 2013 Author Share Posted July 27, 2013 In my comment above, I did not mention the one really interesting segment of the Stossel show.. He interviews a developer by the name of Rod Lockwood, who is heading a group investers and developers that wants to buy or lease a huge island, Belle Isle, between Detroit and Windsor, Canada. Their plan, if it was accepted by Detroit and Michigan authorities (highly unlikely, in my uninformed view), is to create a tax-free, laissez faire zone (Lockwood compares what he has in mind to the highly industrialized and economically successful city-state, modern Singapore, as an example of what he has in mind).Stossel played an excerpt from Stephen Colbert's show where he sarcastically mocks his strawman distortion of Lockwood's idea, referring to it as "an Objectivist orgasm" (or words to that effect). Stossel then asked if he (Lockwood) was an Objectivist, to which he said yes. Lockwood has a book out describing his proposed transformation of Belle Isle. See this link for more information: http://www.mackinac.org/18932 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 In my comment above, I did not mention the one really interesting segment of the Stossel show.. He interviews a developer by the name of Rod Lockwood, who is heading a group investers and developers that wants to buy or lease a huge island, Belle Isle, between Detroit and Windsor, Canada. Their plan, if it was accepted by Detroit and Michigan authorities (highly unlikely, in my uninformed view), is to create a tax-free, laissez faire zone (Lockwood compares what he has in mind to the highly industrialized and economically successful city-state, modern Singapore, as an example of what he has in mind).Stossel played an excerpt from Stephen Colbert's show where he sarcastically mocks his strawman distortion of Lockwood's idea, referring to it as "an Objectivist orgasm" (or words to that effect). Stossel then asked if he (Lockwood) was an Objectivist, to which he said yes. Lockwood has a book out describing his proposed transformation of Belle Isle. See this link for more information: http://www.mackinac.org/18932The idea of a tax free, mostly free enterprise zone in the U.S. is a reproach to every governmental policy and principle since the New Deal.It does not have a hope of being approved. If it were approved it would immediately become the real life Galt's Gulch. We cannot have every productive person in the U.S. defect, can we?Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Biggers Posted July 27, 2013 Author Share Posted July 27, 2013 Here is the link to the Amazon page discussing the book. It is apparently available as a Kindle download or paperback. Already some interesting comments.Also, I misquoted Stephen Colbert's comment. He did not say it sounds lake an "Objectivist orgasm." Rather, an Objectivist "wet dream."Actually, I'm surprised the proposal got this far. The likelihood that Detroit will sell Belle Isle to him is,...zero..http://www.amazon.com/dp/1300621923/ref=rdr_ext_sb_ti_hist_1#_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Hougen Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Just an update. The judge in the bankruptcy filing has named a mediator. He is a member of the Federalist society. However, I don't think that his libertarian leanings will have much effect. As a mediator, all he can really do is shuttle between the groups trying to broker a deal and advising them on the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Just an update. The judge in the bankruptcy filing has named a mediator. He is a member of the Federalist society. However, I don't think that his libertarian leanings will have much effect. As a mediator, all he can really do is shuttle between the groups trying to broker a deal and advising them on the law.Darrell:That is not true. A mediator has much more subtle power than you my realize.A... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Just an update. The judge in the bankruptcy filing has named a mediator. He is a member of the Federalist society. However, I don't think that his libertarian leanings will have much effect. As a mediator, all he can really do is shuttle between the groups trying to broker a deal and advising them on the law.Darrell:That is not true. A mediator has much more subtle power than you m[a]y realize.A...The mediator has more de facto power than the judge who would probably be loath to over-rule the situation after giving him a job to do, especially, as is the likely case, if they had known each other and worked together previously. The judge would not be happy if the opposing parties didn't make things happen and the mediator would be embarrassed. His "subtle" power is a club in the closet behind him--the "club" is the judge is the court.--Brantoh, and the mediator is another judge: put that in your pan and fry it--good luck with that (the feds have completely taken over, BTW) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 No need to have a gun in Detroit...There is one Democrat, State Senator Gretchen Whitmer, who, not realizing what political party she is a member of, actually argued something mostly sensible: “If you want people to live in the city, and not just visit to go to games, you have to invest in schools, in having the police to respond to calls.” (Remember, it takes an average of about an hour for police to respond to emergency calls.) “There are so many investments that should trump a sports stadium.”http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/07/444-million-hockey-stadium-to-be-built-in-bankrupt-detroit/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Right now I feel like police everywhere should take longer than an hour , in fact it might be safer if they never showed up at all.Better to spend the money on hockey.In addition to the killing here recently, the 22 officers plus EMTs managed to trample all over the crime scene, kick potential evidence out of the way, and oh yes, taser the suspect after he had been shot nine times and was apparently dead. Nobody bothered to cordon off the witnesses/spectators who were getting a real eyeful.The cops were solely concerned with the "one of their own" who looked like he might get in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dglgmut Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I love it.In the Zimmerman case it's, "He should have waited for the police!"When the police screw up, "Fuck the police!"It is tough to commit to anything, though, and even tougher to shut up about what you're not committed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 FYI , I consider that Zimmerman was considering himself as the police in that situation.It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 FYI , I consider that Zimmerman was considering himself as the police in that situation.It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one.Saws don't cut wood. Carpenters cut wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dglgmut Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one.That's like saying anyone who's had their arm cut off by a snow-blower "shouldn't have had one". Or anyone who's caused a car accident shouldn't have had a car.What you want is an unrealistic level of control over reality... and it shows throughout your politics.What can be controlled are incentives for people to behave ethically. That means this cop should be charged with at least manslaughter, to make sure police are careful, for their own sake, not to go overboard when dealing with potentially dangerous suspects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 FYI , I consider that Zimmerman was considering himself as the police in that situation.It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one.Saws don't cut wood. Carpenters cut wood.People are not wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 FYI , I consider that Zimmerman was considering himself as the police in that situation.It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one.Saws don't cut wood. Carpenters cut wood.People are not wood. Carol:You know better than to make a specious counter argument.His comparison/analogy is excellent.A... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 FYI , I consider that Zimmerman was considering himself as the police in that situation.It was the guns that killed Trayvon and Sammy, and neither Zimmerman nor Forcillo should have had one.Should Brant Gaede have a gun? Carol snaps her fingers and Brant's gun(s) disappear. Brant no longer has any guns. Brant is home invaded. Brant kills three home invaders with his samurai sword. Should Brant have a samurai sword? Carol snaps her fingers and the samurai sword disappears.Uh, Carol, all I have left now are steak knives. Would you kindly mind your own business?--Brantblood luster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now