Selene Posted August 25, 2012 Share Posted August 25, 2012 Why Women Can't Sleep Have you ever wondered how a woman's brain works?Well....it's finally explained here in one, easy-to-understand illustration:Every one of those little blue balls is a thought about something that needs to be done, a decision or a problem that needs to be solved.A man, only has only 2 balls and they consume all his thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 25, 2012 Share Posted August 25, 2012 Why Women Can't Sleep Have you ever wondered how a woman's brain works?Well....it's finally explained here in one, easy-to-understand illustration:Every one of those little blue balls is a thought about something that needs to be done, a decision or a problem that needs to be solved.A man, only has only 2 balls and they consume all his thoughts.You have given 2 reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 (edited) I don't want women to sleep.--Brant Edited August 26, 2012 by Brant Gaede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 I don't women to sleep.--BrantNo Woman no Sleep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 26, 2012 Author Share Posted August 26, 2012 I don't women to sleep.--BrantNo Woman no Sleep?Scary part is you answered that undecipherable post by Brant... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 I don't women to sleep.--BrantNo Woman no Sleep?Scary part is you answered that undecipherable post by Brant...I don't women to sleep.--BrantNo Woman no Sleep?Scary part is you answered that undecipherable post by Brant...i'm used to deciphering sentences with no verbs at all, so one that only contains an auxiliary verb is easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 ~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~I don't want women to sleep.--Branthope that helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 ~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~I don't want women to sleep.--Branthope that helpsIt doesn't help the women much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 ~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~Edit alert!~I don't want women to sleep.--Branthope that helpsIt doesn't help the women much.~Women alert!~Women alert!~Women alert!~They are everywhere! Look!Brant is a misogynist!--Branttrue lies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 XRay quick, where are you? We got him on the run now, he's spooked - it's your chance to go in and make any argument you want, and he'll just roll over and whimper!Still can't trust him though...I heered tell that Mama Gaede didn't raise no misogynists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 XRay quick, where are you? We got him on the run now, he's spooked - it's your chance to go in and make any argument you want, and he'll just roll over and whimper!Still can't trust him though...I heered tell that Mama Gaede didn't raise no misogynists.I know I'm stepping in shit and can't find the exit.--Brantfirst post on my new computergood God!--I'm over 11,000 posts and didn't even notice--I can't be that old! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 26, 2012 Author Share Posted August 26, 2012 Just because the noble Sir Brant of Arizona makes penetrating arguments about women does not mean he is one of those missy thinga ma jigs...And just because this frustrated League of Misandry Madames gets more face time in our perverse modern culture certainly does not mean they know what they are talking about... <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wBIC8JTQMMQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> And clearly Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan were elected on a late ballot... AdamRecording Secretary For the He Man Woman Hater's Club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Hah! You presume we do not earn our visibililty on merit -- (X, Come out of the bathroom, your hair looks fine! No I really mean it it looks great -)and in a rational world, men of superior merit would naturally supersede women of inferior merit, as would women of superior merit, even if they preferred to be thought of as men like Ayn Rand did, supersede oh well anybody of inferior merit oh I don't know XRAY!! COME OUT OF THE BATHROOM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 We need to reset this contretempts with a 1960s' Objectivist cliche: It is the man who penetrates and the woman who is penetrated with all that it means [for the man].--Brantlet the rationality begin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 Alas.much as I hate to halt anything in mid-romp, rationality does in fact rear its ugly head.Rand's inability to separate her individual sexuality from her philosophy was an excuse for serious philosophers not to take her seriously , and as well as a reason her novels continue to sell so well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 26, 2012 Author Share Posted August 26, 2012 So...we should not take Plato and Aristotle seriously because of their individual sexuality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 So...we should not take Plato and Aristotle seriously because of their individual sexuality?Of course not, and nor should readers in the 20th century, but Rand happened to be under public scrutiny then, not in the Golden Age of Greece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted August 26, 2012 Author Share Posted August 26, 2012 So...we should not take Plato and Aristotle seriously because of their individual sexuality?Of course not, and nor should readers in the 20th century, but Rand happened to be under public scrutiny then, not in the Golden Age of Greece.Ok then your principle should apply to current philosophers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted August 26, 2012 Share Posted August 26, 2012 I don't know any current philosophers/ But if my principle is, if your philosophy derives in part from your peronal sexuality, then you better be able to support your whole philosophy six ways to Sunday, then yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now