J.K. Gregg Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Objectively speaking...Would a security alliance between two states be a proper exercise in government authority? If so, would an agreement including the clause that an attack on one alliance member is an attack on all be rational?Thanks,J.K. Gregg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Objectively speaking...Would a security alliance between two states be a proper exercise in government authority?If so, would an agreement including the clause that an attack on one alliance member is an attack on all be rational?Thanks,J.K. Greggan alliance against a common enemy. sure. why not?Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjw Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Objectively speaking...Would a security alliance between two states be a proper exercise in government authority?If so, would an agreement including the clause that an attack on one alliance member is an attack on all be rational?Thanks,J.K. GreggIt depends on what the original attack was about. An alliance to retaliate regardless of who is the original aggressor is definitely bogus.Shayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now