Jon Letendre

You don't have to answer, I know it's because Peter complained to you about me laughing at him. Peter makes regular donations. I have never made any donation. That's why you were going to have to do something.

After years of quite intentionally driving away anyone who might challenge your weak little self on anything at all you are left with what's really just your personal blog and with defending a donor, from myself and recently from TG, who is an actual, objective detraction from the site.

Congratulations!

2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

since Jon has found a way to troll with them.

So which is it, Michael? You wondered how the hell I "found a way" or you thought I had that and every other posting privilege the whole time?

And why were you going to restrict my emoting? Why was my emoting "trolling" while every other user simply emotes.

Fuck you.

Ban me, already.

Then ban me, you dumb and weak lying little prick.

It's all I've wanted since your psychotic breakdown over my pointing out Millie Weaver's obviously faked "arrest."

Stop presenting as like we've fixed anything and are "like brothers again."

We're not. I hate you. So ban me.

7 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

 

That's the kind of stuff I used to say, too.

I used to think I was fooling people.

It's a new story right now, but it's always the same old story.

I wish you well.

Michael

Now you added gaslighting psychopath. Nice, Michael.

5 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Getting to ya' is it?

Not at all.

Go ahead and lie more, Loser.

I have never had any problem, Junkie. Nice total imagination smear, there.

Don't push the gutter life on others, Drunk.

You don't need another to toke-up, anyway, Junkie. Have at it.

4 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

And you're a poo-poo head, poo-poo head.

Knock another one back and let's go again.

 

Maybe ask someone else.

11 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

btw - Crack was only five years. But I was a drunk for a decade before that.

Does it take one to know one?...

Maybe...

Just sayin'...

Michael

Nope.

But nice try, Drunk and Crack Fiend.

I was at college, then a software company, then a landlord, then I raised children, while you burned and inhaled a lot of ... something, we will never know exactly what was in it. Sorry, no drugs or drinking for me. I have always been focused and healthy.

Do you have any neurons left, after all the decades of crank and crack or whatever it was they told you were getting?

10 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Poor Jon... Poor poor Jon...

But don't exaggerate like that, I will be fine.

I have seen this before and already knew you were a very small person about some things. You will continue to smear like a scummy very small person and then change the subject, it just is you, your way. I accept it. I'm not hurt at all, why would your shortcomings hurt me? That's cute.

3 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

I didn't realize I was such a meanie.

Yeah. You are pretty dumb and unfair.

1 hour ago, Jon Letendre said:

If I bullied anyone who was going about like you do above, making real discussion without the personal, then I want to sincerely apologize to them. Who was it?

And it is ok that there are no such people for you to cite. I accept that you will readily smear, then refuse to name one specific example of your smear, then pretend nothing happened.

You meme like shit.

Comparatively, the left makes funny memes.

2 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Blah blah blah.

It's all about Jon.

Boo hoo hoo... 

Since this is a humor thread (except for the all about Jon pity parties), let's see if Ginsberg is alive.

Hmmmmm...

Michael

I accept that you will not address the points I made against an obviously fake video beyond your rhetorical "that's enough would to build a house" put-down.

3 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Jon,

I recall the photo comparisons and things like that, but I don't know the source of those things. Everybody has image editors these days.

I do know that I have lived in a country where they actually did put up a dead President as alive (Tancredo Neves).

Even with the shitty Brazilian press, the bad guys did not get away with that one. People still talk about that. Everyday people, not just people on the edges.

What I saw here in America--with the Internet going full blast, at that--was nothing like that.

The fake news media and the establishment are despicable, but porous. The Edward Snowdens do get through against all odds. And I haven't see anything like that in this case.

So I, for one, don't buy the Ginsberg is dead theory as likely. I would not put an attempt like that past the evil boneheads in the Deep State, so I don't discount the possibility. But I find it really remote.

Michael

That is a great statement. I did provide much, much more, it is here.

I only recall getting nasty with people who refused to discuss and went straight to belittling me personally.

If I bullied anyone who was going about like you do above, making real discussion without the personal, then I want to sincerely apologize to them. Who was it? I honestly cannot recall any.

No, I cited many things that are wrong with that video. And I have since seen many other people noticed the same things. You have not addressed them, but only cast doubt on all of it, you responded, "that's enough would to build a house." You don't see what we see, so we must be cliquish and shallow, you went there seamlessly.

4 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Ruth Bader Ginsberg is still alive and kicking.

Some of her doubles are but certainly not the original woman.

I don't need to be taken on faith about that, I only objected when dumb people who haven't looked into it yet knee-jerk their thoughtless rejection, because it sounds like a "conspiracy theory" and offer only put-downs. I have offered much research and evidence on Ruth. I objected to the assholes who demonstrably know nothing, don't even try, but only come with the "you people" put-down. You face it all the time and know exactly what I mean. I did not bully anyone for not right away believing what I know about Ruth, I only bullied those who brought that sort of shitty and bullying-worthy weakass non-responses to my evidence.

I am only concerned about Millie's obvious fakes and lies.

But no, you do not have to take my word for it about the above. You can continue your outrageous insults about me being motivated by cliqueism and shallowness, instead.

9 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Looking out? You mean like for danger?

Here on OL?

Yes. Yes.

No.

Millie and Alex.

But you know that. Sorry you are so hurt, it is not about you, or I.

It is about Millie pretending to be WWG1WGA.

Smart gal.

She addresses the Big Switch Lie that so many liberals who think they are educated actually believe in.

Dinesh D'Souza has destroyed it, as well.

Yup, looking out for the actions by the enemy that the QAnon community has been anticipating for about two years, is ... mere online bickering. Well done, genius.

Stay the fuck home, Fascist Shitbags trying to impose on the healthy and thriving.

Keep your frail, infirm and frightened selves away from us and the children. Rand had that right, the children should not have to see things like you, it is abuse. (She said 'the disabled", and that is what you are.)

And anything we don't like and disagree with we dispose of by calling it online bickering. Infinite convenience.

You defend Alex and Millie out of cliqueism. Fuck cliqueism.

Fun?