A moment is just a moment. What makes it so is due to one who can perceive the events during such. The infinity that you refer to is only infinite so long as a sentient body continues to function or live and thus making such moments finite. Also, I believe "moments" would have to involved a heightened awareness of events which "stretches out" the sequence of events thus dragging it out and increases its intensity. Separation is not an illusion, it absolutely exists. It is a portion of reality perceived by an conscious entity. Illusion is a phenomenon in perception or rather, a misrepresentation of an existent to an observer. Therefore, it implies that something exists to perceive another thing and that being has a form which defines it or, delimits it to a certain nature which in turn, makes it possible for it to identify itself apart from the object which he perceives. What do you call this "one thing"? If it can be named, it cannot be therefore that it is only one thing because obviously, it would follow that other "one things" exist and those also have their names and properties and forms which have limits. You said: "Imagine there is one thing, and one thing only. What surrounds it? It is the only thing, and therefor nothing limits it. It is infinite." You must be a believer of solipsism if you think like this. One cannot fully and truly imagine only one thing existing as imagination involves conception and concepts could not be formed without a context or background. I must point out that you're trying to trip your audience by merely speaking of anything or everything in existence such that you can get away from the act of defining what the hell it is that you want to say. All things are infinite only to the point where they cease. Only to the point where a conscious being chooses a portion (measure) of it to suit his purpose or fill his need and capacity. The possibilities are infinite so long as you do not ask, "the possibilities of what?" and there you will see that the the only borders are the nature of an object and the capabilities and nature of the consciousness who beholds the object. You said: "Right away I have to say that this is not an argument..." Sir, you must know that reflections, when presented to others to be judged will eventually lead to a discourse on the subject and argumentation is an essential part of that. Hell, you can already make evaluations as you observe and reflect and what makes it so is the existence of contrast i.e. you always need two or more things plus a context or background to be able to perform any mental act. If you are not looking for an argument, then are you looking for agreement without judgment? Thanks for the reply. I want people to argue against anything I say, but I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone else... I just want to see what people have to say. I'd sum up what I'm saying like this: Something cannot be limited by nothingness/nonexistence. Limits are always separation; an end is always another beginning. What is really confusing me, though, is the idea of a finite fraction of something infinite. If there is an infinite amount of space, and you were to divide it in two, where the hell would the border be? It seems the border could not exists... Or that one side could never be observed on its own... Also: What is separation? How can there be more than one thing? Or how could one thing be divided??? - Aren't atoms just made up of energy? Haven't they found out that everything is made up of the same energy and really, nothing is physical in the sense of taking up space?