dennislmay

Since 2005 I have been discussing some of my work on alternative physics and alternative cosmology in various forums – primarily on a yahoo discussion group in addition to self-published book form. The work extends from 1990 to the present. It is my opinion that there are many misconceptions as to the current state of evidence supporting Big Bang Cosmology. It is my contention that every major tenant of the Big Bang approach may be better explained using an alternative approach that is internally consistent and consistent with observation. The three major tenants of the Big Bang Theory are: The observed Hubble red-shift is the result of the expansion of space as modeled using General Relativity. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation [CMBR] is the radiation left over from a time when the universe was in black-body thermal contact prior to the continued expansion of the universe. The ratio of light elements found the universe is due to the conditions found during the early portion of Big Bang expansion. My alternative explanation for each of these primary points originates in the foundations of a particular non-linear branch of de Broglie-Bohm [deBB] quantum mechanics incorporating the work of Gregory S. Duane on the foundations of such a quantum mechanics. A quick summary of the alternative explanation for each of the three major tenants: The observed Hubble red-shift is the result of a slow universal increase in the speed of passage of time. Space is not expanding. This is a by-product of the non-linear model of quantum mechanics. Example of observational support – the apparent geometrical size/brightness of galaxies does not match their Big Bang derived distance – rather a distance you would expect if the universe is not expanding. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation [CMBR] is the black-body radiation resulting from non-linear QM thermal contact in the present nearby universe. Example of observational support – the CMBR does not having lensing or shadowing characteristics consistent with a source from near the beginning of a Big Bang expansion. In fact the CMBR shadows fills in behind galaxies indicating continual production in nearby space. The ratio of light elements found the universe is due to the continual recycling and regeneration of matter in a very old universe using non-linear QM. Example of observational support – though supporters claim the ratio of elements support the Big Bang model there are numerous observations contradicting this assertion. The most glaring example is the failure to find first generation red-dwarf stars which according to all theory should be abundant and only beginning their long existence in the age available to the Big Bang theory. Red-dwarf stars are the most abundant type indicating a first order failure in prediction. This is just a flavor and I hope to have time to expand during further discussion.

Hello, I am Dennis May - I have been on some 5-6 Objectivist oriented discussion groups starting in Jan 2000. Just skimming about I see more than a half dozen familiar names. George H. Smith thought I might be interested in contributing thought on alternative physics since that is my lifelong passion and we were discussing it elsewhere. Alternatives to Big Bang cosmology is where I would like to start so I will look around to see where to discuss that topic. See you in the posts.