Hey, this is like a re-union so many posters I used to deal with at Greg's blog. Don't you feel sorry for them? I think I remember Perigo way back at Greg's blog. Not much of a thinker. He tried to attack me lamely, which I dodged with no sweat. She used to be a regular at Greg's blog, didn't like my style and (I think) tried to get me removed, but failed. I think her purpose is to tell people how many VIPs she knows and how many books she's read to be admired as an intellectual. He conversed with me once when I first started posting at Greg's blog, in a sense, I think he's like me. He's kinda intense and tends to ask profound and pertinent questions in a very direct way. Even though he was my opponent at the time, and pretty intense and aggressive one at that, he was fair. His questioning forced me to give the longest and the most detailed answer I gave to a person I think is an Objectivist. Btw. It was about morality. I think he posted every now and then at Greg's blog, didn't talk too much. One of the semi-regular poster, at Greg's and a pretty good thinker. I think I gave him a very hard time once or twice at Greg's (but not in a bullying way) Smart in a tactical sense, didn't talk too much at Greg's blog in a way to leave himself vulnerable to counters. If I remember him correctly, I think I gave him a very hard time once at Greg's blog. (But no bullying) What's the answer? Btw. Greg Nyquist's blog is dedicated to exposing Objectivist "fallacy". Sometimes I agreed with Greg, sometimes with a few claiming to be Objectivists, which kinda pissed Greg off. (He thought I was on his side.) I was seeking the best correlation I can find between various proposed "causes" and "effects". Neither necessarily for "Objectivism" nor against "Objectivism".