adarsha

Thank you Alfonso. I have read what you want, but I speak about my ideas in this way. Perhaps you are not the correct destiny. Sorry Néstor González Loza Engineer

Well, Alfonso. Let me rewrite it: We, as human beings, want to produce goods and services of a highly superior value compared with the goods and services which we’ll consume. We might say that we’re capable of producing 50% more than we consume. If we acknowledge the certainty of this indisputable difference between the human species and the animal kingdom, and independently of whether we concur that its cause is metaphysical, let’s analyse what happens in reality. Only 10% of people achieve their 50% surplus objective. They’re those whom we call enterprisers. Either because they delimit a plot of land, invent a machine or buy it, they can generate surpluses in said proportion. Moreover, the potency of their human objective manages to drag with it another objective, as important as the human one, or more so: When they work with assets, they make that capital also produce 50% more than it consumes. In this manner, the wheel is set in motion, the most exquisite virtue of human beings: progress. The rest of the people, the ones we call salaried, don’t achieve their objective because they don’t count on capital, and must use their boss’s capital. And since their boss doesn’t pay them for what they do, but rather for what they need, they end up producing scarcely a little above what they consume. In this aspect, they give the impression of existing more like an animal than a human being. If the boss would pay them for what they do, he would surely cause his personnel to achieve their transcendent objective, so that this “drawing forward” would make their capital also achieve revenues four times higher than at present. To do this, the boss would have to calculate the percentage that his company is achieving. He should compare the profits of his enterprise with the sum of the costs of frozen capital and those of his personnel, which is none other than what both protagonists consume. Afterwards, he should apply that percentage as a plus over the salaries. However, he’s satisfied with lower yields because he resolves his own problem. Yet the outcome is that his objective is not a social one. However, the State should endeavour that labour relations attain viability for this transcendent objective of the salaried, because this would not only eradicate poverty but also make the progress of overall society constantly escalate. Nonetheless, strangely enough, the State does exactly the opposite. It taxes the profits of the firms but instead of redirecting that money towards the personnel of said firm, it uses it as assistance for the poor that its own error is generating. The State is affixed to unnatural doctrines that constrict the greatest energy that exists on the planet: the attitude of the salaried. For this reason, the damage becomes infinitely potent. If Profits Tax were redirected towards the own personnel and the outside personnel of all enterprises, the salaried could achieve their objective (physical, psychological and spiritual) of producing around 50% more than they consume. And all the capital invested in production would be highly profitable, doing away with unemployment and poverty. It should be pointed out that Profits Tax punishes principally the enterprises with a higher load of personnel. And that is the chief reason why unemployment exists. Synthesizing, we have been designed to produce far more than we consume. Besides, that innate interior potency which we all posses and which resides in the psyche (exclusive to human beings), is capable of making the capital used with the aforementioned objective, even if it’s not our own, also produce far more than it consumes, in identical proportion; that’s to say, it can achieve exceptional revenues. We’ve decided to call the virtues of these novel labour relations “Drawing Forward Theory”.

Let me show you our theory: We, as human beings, have been designed to produce goods and services of a highly superior value compared with the goods and services which we’ll consume. We might say that we’re capable of producing 50% more than we consume. The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, referred to in Genesis, and which is situated in the garden between our physical home (the body) and our spiritual home (the soul), imposes this transcendent objective on us. It’s the one that produces this fruit; that’s to say, the estimated 50% aforementioned aggregate. Animals don’t rely on that tree. They only have The Tree of Life, thanks to which they may go through life without extraneous shocks, but failing to produce a surplus above what they’ve consumed. If we acknowledge the certainty of this indisputable difference between the human species and the animal kingdom, and independently of whether we concur that its cause is metaphysical, let’s analyse what happens in reality. Only 10% of people achieve their 50% surplus objective. They’re those whom we call enterprisers. Either because they delimit a plot of land, invent a machine or buy it, they can generate surpluses in said proportion. Moreover, the potency of their human objective manages to drag with it another objective, as important as the human one, or more so: When they work with assets, they make that capital also produce 50% more than it consumes. In this manner, the wheel is set in motion, the most exquisite virtue of human beings: progress. The rest of the people, the ones we call salaried, don’t achieve their objective because they don’t count on capital, and must use their boss’s capital. And since their boss doesn’t pay them for what they do, but rather for what they need, they end up producing scarcely a little above what they consume. In this aspect, they give the impression of existing more like an animal than a human being. If the boss would pay them for what they do, he would surely cause his personnel to achieve their transcendent objective, so that this “drawing forward” would make their capital also achieve revenues four times higher than at present. To do this, the boss would have to calculate the percentage that his company is achieving. He should compare the profits of his enterprise with the sum of the costs of frozen capital and those of his personnel, which is none other than what both protagonists consume. Afterwards, he should apply that percentage as a plus over the salaries. However, he’s satisfied with lower yields because he resolves his own problem. Yet the outcome is that his objective is not a social one. However, the State should endeavour that labour relations attain viability for this transcendent objective of the salaried, because this would not only eradicate poverty but also make the progress of overall society constantly escalate. Nonetheless, strangely enough, the State does exactly the opposite. It taxes the profits of the firms but instead of redirecting that money towards the personnel of said firm, it uses it as assistance for the poor that its own error is generating. The State is affixed to unnatural doctrines that constrict the greatest energy that exists on the planet: the attitude of the salaried. For this reason, the damage becomes infinitely potent. If Profits Tax were redirected towards the own personnel and the outside personnel of all enterprises, the salaried could achieve their objective (physical, psychological and spiritual) of producing around 50% more than they consume. And all the capital invested in production would be highly profitable, doing away with unemployment and poverty. It should be pointed out that Profits Tax punishes principally the enterprises with a higher load of personnel. And that is the chief reason why unemployment exists. Synthesizing, we have been designed to produce far more than we consume. Besides, that innate interior potency which we all posses and which resides in the psyche (exclusive to human beings), is capable of making the capital used with the aforementioned objective, even if it’s not our own, also produce far more than it consumes, in identical proportion; that’s to say, it can achieve exceptional revenues. We’ve decided to call the virtues of these novel labour relations “Drawing Forward Theory”.

Drawing Forward Theory We, as human beings, have been designed to produce goods and services of a highly superior value compared with the goods and services which we’ll consume. We might say that we’re capable of producing 50% more than we consume. The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, referred to in Genesis, and which is situated in the garden between our physical home (the body) and our spiritual home (the soul), imposes this transcendent objective on us. It’s the one that produces this fruit; that’s to say, the estimated 50% aforementioned aggregate. Animals don’t rely on that tree. They only have The Tree of Life, thanks to which they may go through life without extraneous shocks, but failing to produce a surplus above what they’ve consumed. If we acknowledge the certainty of this indisputable difference between the human species and the animal kingdom, and independently of whether we concur that its cause is metaphysical, let’s analyse what happens in reality. Only 10% of people achieve their 50% surplus objective. They’re those whom we call enterprisers. Either because they delimit a plot of land, invent a machine or buy it, they can generate surpluses in said proportion. Moreover, the potency of their human objective manages to drag with it another objective, as important as the human one, or more so: When they work with assets, they make that capital also produce 50% more than it consumes. In this manner, the wheel is set in motion, the most exquisite virtue of human beings: progress. The rest of the people, the ones we call salaried, don’t achieve their objective because they don’t count on capital, and must use their boss’s capital. And since their boss doesn’t pay them for what they do, but rather for what they need, they end up producing scarcely a little above what they consume. In this aspect, they give the impression of existing more like an animal than a human being. If the boss would pay them for what they do, he would surely cause his personnel to achieve their transcendent objective, so that this “drawing forward” would make their capital also achieve revenues four times higher than at present. To do this, the boss would have to calculate the percentage that his company is achieving. He should compare the profits of his enterprise with the sum of the costs of frozen capital and those of his personnel, which is none other than what both protagonists consume. Afterwards, he should apply that percentage as a plus over the salaries. However, he’s satisfied with lower yields because he resolves his own problem. Yet the outcome is that his objective is not a social one. However, the State should endeavour that labour relations attain viability for this transcendent objective of the salaried, because this would not only eradicate poverty but also make the progress of overall society constantly escalate. Nonetheless, strangely enough, the State does exactly the opposite. It taxes the profits of the firms but instead of redirecting that money towards the personnel of said firm, it uses it as assistance for the poor that its own error is generating. The State is affixed to unnatural doctrines that constrict the greatest energy that exists on the planet: the attitude of the salaried. For this reason, the damage becomes infinitely potent. If Profits Tax were redirected towards the own personnel and the outside personnel of all enterprises, the salaried could achieve their objective (physical, psychological and spiritual) of producing around 50% more than they consume. And all the capital invested in production would be highly profitable, doing away with unemployment and poverty. It should be pointed out that Profits Tax punishes principally the enterprises with a higher load of personnel. And that is the chief reason why unemployment exists. Synthesizing, we have been designed to produce far more than we consume. Besides, that innate interior potency which we all posses and which resides in the psyche (exclusive to human beings), is capable of making the capital used with the aforementioned objective, even if it’s not our own, also produce far more than it consumes, in identical proportion; that’s to say, it can achieve exceptional revenues. We’ve decided to call the virtues of these novel labour relations “Drawing Forward Theory”. We´ll go for an intrenational award with this What do you think?

I don´t know him

It is not a question of “spreading” other’s money or feeding the “class struggle”. It is not a question of inventing a “new international alliance” as the ones that have failed in this struggle against poverty. The topic is much simpler. Every salary earner in natural conditions, without the negative influences of the present social economic systems can easily produce 50% more than what he consumes. But nowadays, half of the salary earners produce only 10% above their consumption and the rest consume more than what they produce. Half of the salary earners work as animals, and the other half live from other’s work, more outrageously than animals. Imagine that one of the two horses that are supposed to pull a cart suddenly climbs onto it. The secret of the struggle against poverty, then, is on the awakening of the salary earners attitude, which is the natural incentive to the action that is on lethargy at the present time. The essential problem can be resolve with a mobilization measure that will generate more surpluses; plus the collection, which will end with the union conflict, the unemployment and poverty, and the consistent lack of safety. For that horse, which is making a double effort, to breath, and for the other one to be dignify returning to his place of pulling the cart, there is a Bill that can be instigate in order to end with poverty in a few months. It is a question of paying the salary earners for their work and not for their needs. We all know that in any salary negotiation, those are the two options (maximum, and minimum respectively). There has not been a single State who has guaranteed justice in that negotiation. Then, salary earners succumb and that is the reason why they lose the natural incentives to the action. They became lethargy people, with frustration, anxiety, dejection, depression, addiction and a self exclusion of the community, which made them less productive and violent. In order to end the union conflicts and to make the enterprises more profitable, a specific part of what the employers have paid as the profits tax must be prorated between the own and third personnel of the enterprise. It is the State, then, who has to pay those pay rises for the productivity the employers have never sustained because of their privilege position. There is a mathematical model showing the influences these labour relations will have in the economy and it reads that the investments will quadruple its profitability and that the salary earners will duplicate their purchasing power. Any million dollar investment in production will yield 250,000 per year, when it only yields 60,000 at the present. And all the salary earners will duplicate their profits; this benefit will not be dissolved with the time as it always does, on the contrary, it would improve. The salary earners will be prosperous for the first time in history. They will be paid for what they do and not for what they need. There will be economic stability and total predictability, and the index will always grow. At the time all the productive investments are more profitable, unemployment and poverty will disappear. Please read all the details in our web site, and help us to spread this Project, which is the most effective for the ending of this self interested economy behavior, which is the cause of poverty. Our Project does not collide with any ideology, but it strengthens all of them. www.proyectoactitud.com

Thank you Michael!: We think this is a global trouble, but in Latin américa is emphasised. How could a society work out without knowing who is good and who is evil? There is great confussion in that matter because of the "operations" that had modified persons and public opinion. The "vatican social doctrine" stablished the idea that ethics is equivalent to moral simulation. But the worst harm it has done to us, is to neutralize the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil", establishing a paradoxal economic social system. The "Reversed Tree" teachs us that if someone produces more than consumes, is a good person. The others (not been handicapped) are not convenient for the society. When salary-earners became payed for what they do and not for what they need, good persons will be prosper, and evil persons will be poor. It will be easy to differentiate one from another, an so they could be treated as deserved. It will finish fear and blame manipulation hold by politics And ethics simulation will be the worst immorality.

If someone produces more than consumes, is a good person. The rest, if able, don´t suit to society. If we begin paying salary-earners for what they do, and not for what they need, good persons will be prosper and bad persons will be poor. It will be easy to differentiate one respect the other, an so they could be treated as worth. It will finish political manipulation.

Dear Michael: You can see that our Project is based in Ayn Rand teachings. That´s why we want to post here if we can. Thank you Néstor

Dear Michael Stuart Kelly, First of all our apologizes for our very bad English; our ancestors are also celtic as yours but they were from North Spanish region. For your good idea of publishing the printscreen with the error , we could investigate the problem and we found a page that explains it in a very clear way. The website is http://kb.mozillazine.org/Macromedia_Flash and in it you can read the following: Illegal Operation In Plug-In If certain web pages cause "Illegal Operation In Plug-In" errors that refer to "Shockwave Flash" and contain the message, The plugin performed an illegal operation. You are strongly advised to restart Navigator (or Firefox): The Mozilla ActiveX plugin can cause this error [8]. Removing the file "npmozax.dll" from the Firefox or Mozilla Suite installation directory plugins folder (see above) may stop the error. Removing the files "GetFlash.exe" and "GetFlash.exe.manifest" from the Firefox or Mozilla Suite installation directory plugins folder and from the C:\WINDOWS\System32\Macromed\Flash folder (if found) may stop the errors [9] The problem is often resolved [10] by uninstalling Flash 8 or 9 and installing Flash 7 (on Windows, use the Netscape installer for Firefox and Mozilla Suite - see above). This problem may be caused by a rootkit type virus. Scanning your hard drive using a program like F-secure Blacklight(trial version) and having it rename the offending files has been reported to solve the problem for some. As you can see the problem is or a configuration trouble or a virus infection in your machine. We hope that this can help you to solve this problem. Best regards, Mónica Suárez Groba and Ulysses Pimentel Viaño Webmasters of www.proyectoactitud.com

Dear visitor, the link that you mention is referred to the main page of the website that is in html code with two flash objects embedded (the animation and the sound) and four gif files corresponding to 2 buttons and 2 flags. We never use any type of malware (virus, trojans, spyware, keyloggers, phishing, etc) in our designs and not even cookies or another intrusive method in this site in question. This page has not none code line in dynamic code as php, asp, javascript, etc. neither. We tested this page in two differentes PCs and each one with two different browsers in two different resolutions (IE 1024x768, Firefox 1024x768, IE 800x600, Firefox 800x600) and we have never received any message of an illegal operation. The Flash plugins installed in each PCs are: 9,0,28,0 and Flash 9,0,45,0. We have never received any question or consultation about this subject from anybody of the more than 5500 visitors of the website, but we will answer you any technical question that you want to ask us. As the page code is in simple html and not in php (it does not process in server) can be audited for you only seeing the code from the browser. Best regards. The webmasters of www.proyectoactitud.com

Dear visitor, The link that you mention is referred to the main page of the website that is in html code with two flash objects embedded (the animation and the sound) and four gif files corresponding to 2 buttons and 2 flags. We never use any type of malware (virus, trojans, spyware, keyloggers, phishing, etc) in our designs and not even cookies or another intrusive method in this site in question. This page has not none code line in dynamic code as php, asp, javascript, etc. neither. We tested this page in two differentes PCs and each one with two different browsers in two different resolutions (IE 1024x768, Firefox 1024x768, IE 800x600, Firefox 800x600) and we have never received any message of an illegal operation. The Flash plugins installed in each PCs are: 9,0,28,0 and Flash 9,0,45,0. We have never received any question or consultation about this subject from anybody of the more than 5500 visitors of the website, but we will answer you any technical question that you want to ask us. As the page code is in simple html and not in php (it does not process in server) can be audited for you only seeing the code from the browser. Best regards. The webmasters of www.proyectoactitud.com

What a wonderful corner! I am argentine and want to show our project to you. Thank you! It deals with the Latin American economic outline that could solve the poverty problem appealing to an unknown energy: the attitude of the salary-earners. It is really innovative and it does not collide with the social vatican doctrine, except from that there is not a “superior request” to the productive projects, which “redistribute” the wealth. It is the first time an economist proposes that each salary-earner should administrate the generated surpluses. Many have suggested that this administration should be in hands of the owner of the means of production, or the State, or some enterprising, professional, or salary-earners corporation. This is the relevance of the matter. It could be the third millennium economy and it will probably be adopted briefly by all the countries. It is an innovative proposal, which consists on redirect the Profits Tax to the own and outside personnel of every means of production, authorizing the enterprises and the autonomous to settle all this tax through discounts receipts to all the personnel of the project, proportional to the remunerations. This will be the key to be able to solve the surpluses of the economy and consequently to grow. It proposes, concretely, that the Profits Tax will not be for the State, but for the personnel of every project. In this way, all the production investments will be more rentable; and enterprisers and wage-earners will prosper in their work. The rest of the community servants will grow in harmony with it "The objective of the enterprisers and salary-earners, will be compatible" With this law, there will be more investments, more profits; there will be progress in each of the participants of the economy, more profitability of the productive investments and maximum collection of the Consumption Tax. It will begin to collect what is being evaded. It will be a supporting plan that will attend all the rights of the majority of the participants of the economy. The artifice of using valuable computer science structure of the Profits Tax, will allow taking advantage of this unique opportunity of the new social-economic system. It will also be an incentive for the personnel of all the enterprises to be compromise in the results of the project. When millions of persons should discover that the Profits Tax of ‘his’ enterprise will be distributed between them, they will start to make an extra effort and they will be more creative. The power of fake syndicalists and irresponsible sponsors of unfair causes will be blurred. The 100 % of the citizenship will be in action through this original mechanism that will motivate everyone in the same direction. The collection through the Profits has been diminishing in the last years. How much you cost, how much you are expected In spit of not noticing it yet, the profitability of all the projects is being reduced dangerously if it is consider at constant values. This means that the paralysis is growing each day. If we say that the enterpriser “owns” minimum the interests, amortizations, maintenance, insurances and taxes inherent to his immobilized capital, (well, that is why he started the project) and if we say that the salary-earner “owns” similarly their remunerations and law accessories, (because that is why they get up every morning and go to work), then, if after paying that costs, there still profits in the project, this is due to the fact that their participants have done more than was expected from them. This is the reason why the profits shall be award proportionally to them. Because the costs are the only thing that allows us to determine the relative potentiality of both: how much you cost, how much you are expected. It is about the logic applied to all the natural humane incentives to the action.

It deals with the Latin American economic outline that could solve the poverty problem appealing to an unknown energy: the attitude of the salary-earners. It is really innovative and it does not collide with the social vatican doctrine, except from that there is not a “superior request” to the productive projects, which “redistribute” the wealth. It is the first time an economist proposes that each salary-earner should administrate the generated surpluses. Many have suggested that this administration should be in hands of the owner of the means of production, or the State, or some enterprising, professional, or salary-earners corporation. This is the relevance of the matter. It could be the third millennium economy and it will probably be adopted briefly by all the countries. It is an innovative proposal, which consists on redirect the Profits Tax to the own and outside personnel of every means of production, authorizing the enterprises and the autonomous to settle all this tax through discounts receipts to all the personnel of the project, proportional to the remunerations. This will be the key to be able to solve the surpluses of the economy and consequently to grow. It proposes, concretely, that the Profits Tax will not be for the State, but for the personnel of every project. In this way, all the production investments will be more rentable; and enterprisers and wage-earners will prosper in their work. The rest of the community servants will grow in harmony with it "The objective of the enterprisers and salary-earners, will be compatible" With this law, there will be more investments, more profits; there will be progress in each of the participants of the economy, more profitability of the productive investments and maximum collection of the Consumption Tax. It will begin to collect what is being evaded. It will be a supporting plan that will attend all the rights of the majority of the participants of the economy. The artifice of using valuable computer science structure of the Profits Tax, will allow taking advantage of this unique opportunity of the new social-economic system. It will also be an incentive for the personnel of all the enterprises to be compromise in the results of the project. When millions of persons should discover that the Profits Tax of ‘his’ enterprise will be distributed between them, they will start to make an extra effort and they will be more creative. The power of fake syndicalists and irresponsible sponsors of unfair causes will be blurred. The 100 % of the citizenship will be in action through this original mechanism that will motivate everyone in the same direction. The collection through the Profits has been diminishing in the last years. How much you cost, how much you are expected In spit of not noticing it yet, the profitability of all the projects is being reduced dangerously if it is consider at constant values. This means that the paralysis is growing each day. If we say that the enterpriser “owns” minimum the interests, amortizations, maintenance, insurances and taxes inherent to his immobilized capital, (well, that is why he started the project) and if we say that the salary-earner “owns” similarly their remunerations and law accessories, (because that is why they get up every morning and go to work), then, if after paying that costs, there still profits in the project, this is due to the fact that their participants have done more than was expected from them. This is the reason why the profits shall be award proportionally to them. Because the costs are the only thing that allows us to determine the relative potentiality of both: how much you cost, how much you are expected. It is about the logic applied to all the natural humane incentives to the action.