Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/25/2024 at 12:20 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

They put Biden up on camera last night to prove he's still alive. No audience, of course. 

The Predator Class is trying to ignore this, but many people are talking about Biden being dead, or maybe deceased. And they keep talking about it.

For instance:

This ain't going away.

Not with the whole world watching.

Michael

  • Thanks 1

Posted

Just for the record, I wrote out the text so it will appear in OL's search index.

The image alone does not get there, nor does any embedded or quoted text.

So if you ever see me writing out the text of an image, know that I am being sneaky.

:) 

Michael

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

Hunter just took one hell of a gamble.

He pled guilty in court.

 

The play here is he gets convicted and sentenced. His father, if he is still president, pardons him.

And if the court process goes on too long and Kamala Harris wins the election, she pardons him once she gets in office.

 

Here is the risk. Hunter's father dies before he can pardon his son. Kamala Harris loses the election.

Maybe if Joe dies and she loses the election, but she she takes office for a few months due to being VP, she might pardon Hunter. But depending on the political winds, she might not. The leverages are all in the backrooms.

Once Trump takes office, Hunter will have even more judicial headaches, not to mention the plethora of investigations into embezzlement, money laundering, bribery, etc., that will ensue.

Michael

Posted
8 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Hunter just took one hell of a gamble.

He pled guilty in court.

 

The play here is he gets convicted and sentenced. His father, if he is still president, pardons him.

And if the court process goes on too long and Kamala Harris wins the election, she pardons him once she gets in office.

 

Here is the risk. Hunter's father dies before he can pardon his son. Kamala Harris loses the election.

Maybe if Joe dies and she loses the election, but she she takes office for a few months due to being VP, she might pardon Hunter. But depending on the political winds, she might not. The leverages are all in the backrooms.

Once Trump takes office, Hunter will have even more judicial headaches, not to mention the plethora of investigations into embezzlement, money laundering, bribery, etc., that will ensue.

Michael

Another possibility is that the evidence is too damning, and that his lawyers said essentially no way you will win.  He decides to forego the stress and drama of a long drawn out court battle.. and hopes for a not so long prison sentence... So, instead of hoping his Daddy rescues him... he gonna turn on him... (learned his morals well from his Pappy he did)... he is going to throw himself at the courts mercy begging for leniency because his Daddy was a baddie and raised him broken and addicted ... 

I think using that tactic would be less risky than hoping for a pardon when there is literally no way to make such a pardon look to the public like anything other than utter corruption.

Posted

What is it with Joe Biden and MAGA Trump support all of a sudden?

The following is not Photoshopped.

I have seen this and answers to what it is all over the place, so I asked Grok.

GROK TEXT

ME: What is the story behind Biden wearing a Trump hat?

GROK: The story behind President Joe Biden wearing a Trump hat unfolded during an event in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, on September 11, 2024. Here's a synthesis of what happened based on various reports and posts:

- Event Context: Biden was visiting Shanksville as part of commemorations for the 9/11 attacks. During this visit, he engaged with local firefighters and the community.

- The Incident: A Trump supporter, present at the event, asked Biden to wear a MAGA (Make America Great Again) hat, which is emblematic of Trump's political brand. Biden complied, briefly wearing the hat. This gesture was captured in photos and videos, leading to widespread discussion and coverage.

- White House Explanation: The White House, through spokespeople like Andrew Bates, explained this act as a gesture towards "bipartisan unity," reminiscent of the unity seen in the aftermath of 9/11. They highlighted Biden's comments about the need to return to a time when political differences were set aside for national unity.

- Public Reaction: The incident sparked a range of reactions on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). Some saw it as a genuine attempt by Biden to bridge political divides, especially on a day meant for national reflection. Others, particularly Trump supporters or those critical of Biden, viewed it with skepticism, questioning the sincerity or timing of the gesture, especially in light of the upcoming election and Biden's previous criticisms of Trump and his supporters.

- Political Implications: This act was interpreted in various ways, from a simple gesture of goodwill to a strategic move possibly aimed at softening his image among Trump voters or even as an attempt to undermine Vice President Kamala Harris by showcasing a more conciliatory approach towards Trump's base.

- Media Coverage: The event was covered across various media outlets, with interpretations ranging from it being a moment of unity to political spin, depending on the outlet's leanings.

This incident encapsulates the complex political landscape of contemporary American politics, where even symbolic gestures like wearing an opponent's campaign hat can be deeply analyzed for political strategy, unity, or division.

END GROK TEXT

 

I have seen a lot of speculation that Biden is signaling his displeasure with being set aside. I think he is sending a warning sign to the machine to stop trying to get him to step down so Harris can become the first female president, even if only for a few months.

 

And now there's this. I presume it is not fake, but I would need to check.

 

Is there trouble in paradise for Joe Biden?

If so, I suspect Jill has a heavy hand in these photos.

Joe's probably thinking of ice cream.

:evil: :) 

Michael

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Interesting.

It looks like Beau Biden was the good guy among the Bidens.

If the information in the video below is true, he was anti-pedophilia and anti-human trafficking to the extreme.

After all that good work, Hunter the pervert slept with his widow.

Make you wonder about how he died...

Michael

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Daddy to the rescue.

Hunter got his pardon.

 

image.png

I'm surprised it took so long.

You know what the irony is?

Hunter is an addict who is still rationalizing (to my knowledge).

That means he ain't gonna stop.

So new charges not covered by this pardon will happen.

I hope they don't and he stays clean.

All we can do is watch and see, but I bet there is a cottage industry of people keeping an eye on him.

I would not want to be Hunter.

:) 

Michael

 

Posted

Good thing influence peddling isn’t a crime , because he’d need a pardon for that too.

Posted

I'm with Julie.

But on the other side, there is the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Imagine how easy it will be for Trump to issue a blanket pardon for all J6 people who have been prosecuted.

:) 

I doubt he will do that if there is some blatant act of violence with irrefutable evidence instead of that bullshit the courts ginned up, but he might just to make a statement.

Joe Biden just made that task easier.

:) 

Michael

Posted

btw - Hunter lost his Fifth Amendment claim with this pardon. If (and when) he is called to appear before Congress and/or court, he cannot refuse to answer something about the events covered in the pardon with the claim that he could incriminate himself since it will be legally impossible to prosecute him.

What's more, he can be prosecuted if he lies or refuses to answer. Legal infringements after the pardon are not covered by the pardon.

I bet a lot of dirt is going to surface from this.

:) 

Michael

Posted

One of the good things to come from the Hunter pardon is that we get to see compilations like the following to highlight the behavior of scum.

Look at how serious, emphatic, and morally self-righteous these politicians are when they say: "No one is above the law."

What's worse, that morally self-righteous tone is one of the favorite rhetorical frames in O-Land, substance no object.

Pretty, ain't it, when reality makes logical goo of the message?

But, to sanctimonious scoundrels, don't worry.

That tone will appear again tomorrow. Persuade again tomorrow. Hide lies again tomorrow.

I want warn about appearance versus reality, but it's a losing battle.

No one is above the tone.

:) 

Michael

Posted
9 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

btw - Hunter lost his Fifth Amendment claim with this pardon. If (and when) he is called to appear before Congress and/or court, he cannot refuse to answer something about the events covered in the pardon with the claim that he could incriminate himself since it will be legally impossible to prosecute him.

What's more, he can be prosecuted if he lies or refuses to answer. Legal infringements after the pardon are not covered by the pardon.

I bet a lot of dirt is going to surface from this.

:) 

Michael

It won't matter to Joe if Hunter spills the beans because Joe won't be prosecuted being senile alto charges may be brought.

But the lids are going to come off all these stinking pots. And think of all the miscreants who weren't pardoned and civil lawsuits galore!

--Brant

  • Like 1
Posted

Brant,

Yup.

And, with Kash at the FBI, nobody will be able to argue against declassifying and releasing it all to the public, unredacted.

I believe Kash will do it, too.

With the release of the Epstein and Diddy lists, we are going to see a house-cleaning.

:) 

Michael

Posted

I am not sure a president can issue pardons for crimes not prosecuted (preemptive pardons). Not many are talking about this, but this is a legal issue that is not hard and fast, as far as I can tell.

Which means, if the following goes through. Biden is thinking about increasing his own family size for all intents and purposes outside of being literal.

WWW.BREITBART.COM

President Joe Biden is weighing preemptive pardons for his allies in Congress and current and former federal officials.

 

In other words, if a preemptive pardon becomes illegal and Biden issues preemptive pardons to all of these people, including the part of the pardon Hunter got that is preemptive, rather than protect all of these people from the consequences of the crimes and abuses of power they committed, Biden will be corralling them all under the same legal umbrella for future prosecution.

I wonder if this is why Trump himself is being so quiet about this.

:) 

I bet the reason Biden started with one pardon only, the one for Hunter, was to see if any legal challenges would be made about the preemptive part.

I have not heard of any being made. So now he is thinking of issuing preemptive pardons for others. I wonder if he will then start to think about issuing preemptive pardons for all cases and for all time...

Imagine if this is a trap, though. Wouldn't it be a shitter if these bad guys thought they were catching a ride to freedom off of Hunter's pardon only to discover, in the end, that they took a ride to  prison?

:) 

 

In the event this preemptive pardon thing turns out to be valid, these people will all be marked for intense scrutiny from the moment the pardon is issued. When bad guys get a legal advantage, many of them do not know when to stop. They begin to believe they are invincible and do the stupidest things.

This is worth keeping an eye on...

 

Michael

Posted
16 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Just a thought.

Biden's preemptive pardon is a two-edged sword. If any one of those people accept the pardon, this becomes an implicit admission of guilt.

Heh...

:) 

Michael

I’m not entirely sure a person can accept or refuse a pardon.  

Whatever the case I suggest they should actively do neither.


Unlike a virtue signalling cancel mob demanding a person speak out one way or another on some divisive issue, I still believe in the right to remain silent, and the presumption of innocence… but I am an old fashioned Classical liberalism sort of fellow.

Posted
1 hour ago, Strictlylogical said:

I still believe in the right to remain silent, and the presumption of innocence

S,

Presumption of innocence? 

For Liz Cheney? For Anthony Fauci?

:) 

How many innocents have to die through government funds and resources under their control, with those assholes holding the courts and law enforcement at bay,  before they get to be under suspicion?

I mean, Jeez, Louise, isn't one bioweapon attack on mankind, or, say, 3 or 4 endless wars for profit, enough to raise a red flag?

:) 

 

Principles are supposed to come from reality, not the other way around. One can only ignore reality for so long before everyone is dead.

Michael

Posted

Let's not forget all those J6 people serving years in prison, often in solitary confinement, because of Liz Cheney. What about their right to silence and presumption of innocence?

For Liz Cheney, they are perfectly able to exercise it behind bars. 

Michael

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now