Coronavirus

[Mark]

The epithet “clot-shot” is catchy and it describes one of two known effects of the so-called vaccines:  innumerable microscopic thrombi at random locations of the body, which can lead to immediate and horrible problems: neurological, vascular, cardiac and in women loss of fertility, miscarriage.  An other effect is damage to the immune system.  The problems that causes can be take a long time to become evident, for example a higher chance of cancer.  I’m a math and physics guy and hardly an expert in biology but that’s what I gather from reading popularizations by doctors.

I uploaded three of my video abridgements to Bitchute so you can give out the links without associating yourself with ARI Watch:

   Therapeutic Nihilism
   bitchute.com/video/zt0ODSeWXnwQ
   Dr. Peter McCullough, 2 October 2021.

   Nurses at Minnesota Town Hall Meeting
   bitchute.com/video/KomgehJEO8JX
   September 2021.  A group of nurses “in the front line” discuss how they are  being treated after refusing the vaccine. First they were heroes, now they are terrorists.

   Sen. Ron Johnson’s roundtable on covid vaccine safety
   bitchute.com/video/UFSIr0rJh10k
   Held on November 2, 2021

I’ll be uploading more soon.  (I deleted the old ARI Watch files but links to them will magically turn into the new BitChute links.)

Videos make good propaganda to give people who come home from work too tired to focus on an article or who, though intelligent, are not very intellectual.  And people can better, or more quickly, judge the character of those imparting the information from a video than from a written work.  And the shortened length not only makes the videos more likely to be watched, the dull parts are gone.  (I’m defensive about videos because a couple of highly intelligent people I know can’t stand them.)

When approaching people on this subject, emphasize that

    Vax versus no vax.
is a false dichotomy.  The real choice is
    Vax versus prophylaxis and treatment.

They should be concerned because:

The vax is dangerous whereas prophylaxis/treatment is safe.

The vax offers no, or quickly waning, immunity whereas prophylaxis/treatment works.

 

[anthony]

Co-authored by Harvey Risch, Prof of epidemiology at Yale, some may've followed him.  Brownstone again:

Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Fail the Jacobson Test ⋆ Brownstone Institute

BROWNSTONE.ORG

---

A careful reading of Jacobson shows that it is not just an automatic consideration allowing the government to do what it wants when a...

 

[Peter]

(RNS) —  Marcus Lamb, a prominent Christian broadcaster known for his outspoken opposition to COVID-19 vaccines, has died after contracting the virus. He was 64. “This morning at 4 a.m. the president and founder of Daystar and the love of my life went to be with Jesus,” said his wife, Joni, on a Tuesday (Nov. 30) morning broadcast. “I wanted you to hear from me that he’s with the Lord.” end quote

I wonder if Lamb’s flock of sheep will continue to baaack his views?

Beevis, that is so mean. What is wrong with you? The man died.

Well, Butthead. How many of his flock died because he told them to NOT get the shot? He’s like one a’ them doomsday pastors.

Is not.

Is so.

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Peter,

Marcus Lamb had a whopping case of diabetes, too. 

And, from what I can tell, he only took Ivermectin.  Nobody is saying if he took anything else or if he started Ivermectin early or whatnot.

At any rate, given his diabetes and age alone, I agree he sounds like he was imprudent.

With the press we have these days, I think it will be several weeks before we will be able to sift out the facts from the bullshit about him. This story has too many markers the press salivates over for them to be objective right now. And the people on his side will probably be hiding stuff.

Michael

[Mark]

19 minutes ago, Peter said:

(RNS) —  Marcus Lamb, a prominent Christian broadcaster known for his outspoken opposition to COVID-19 vaccines, has died after contracting the virus. ...

What treatment did he receive?

[Peter]

13 minutes ago, Mark said:

What treatment did he receive?

What he deserved? Michael mentioned Ivermectin but I didn't read pastor the headline.

[tmj]

How many of his flock died because he told them to NOT get the shot?

None, butthead, that's not how that works .

[Peter]

Just now, tmj said:

How many of his flock died because he told them to NOT get the shot?

None, butthead, that's not how that works .

He set a "fine example" for his flock to follow.

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

14 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

I argued with you, and with Barbara, once upon a time over whether Mark is antisemitic.  He's anti America being run to suit Israel.  It isn’t the same thing,

I don’t want to argue the issue again.

Ellen,

I thought I was finished, but this came up from an old post TG just now bumbed.

On 10/18/2007 at 9:05 PM, Mark said:

My writing, Michael says, “borders on antisemitism.”

No, Michael, it is antisemitism.

I had forgotten about this.

It's from 2007.

I suppose I can go out and find quotes from him that are anti-Jew, not just anti-Israel, and probably more insinuation than outright confession like here. But who knows? In the end, why stay in that "Israel is different than Jew" as a smokescreen frame when the guy comes right out and says it? is that really necessary?

 

Now go on and admit it.

Admit it.

I know it ain't pleasant, but you just gotta give it up.

Believe me.

It will even make you feel better...

 

I finally got to pull a gotcha on you.

   

Michael

[Peter]

Fauci is just now on the telly saying the first case of Omincron has been found in California. He is saying something about getting more vaccinations.

 

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

51 minutes ago, Peter said:

Fauci is just now on the telly saying the first case of Omincron has been found in California. He is saying something about getting more vaccinations.

Peter,

Ka-ching!

Michael

 

EDIT: Then there's this.

(We need to take this seriously. It's not a case of wining an argument. The government has to stop blocking people from using medicine so they can sell more vaccines.)

[Mark]

MSK has to put his comment over on this thread, where it has no relevance at all, so he can pretend "Gotcha."

I am an anti-semite. 

For the context see the full discussion in the ARI Watch thread.  I believe Ellen knows exactly what I mean when I say it.

 

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

24 minutes ago, Mark said:

MSK has to put his comment over on this thread, where it has no relevance at all, so he can pretend "Gotcha."

I am an anti-semite. 

For the context see the full discussion in the ARI Watch thread.  I believe Ellen knows exactly what I mean when I say it.

Mark,

Stings, doesn't it?

 

 

Antisemite but not antisemite.

Says crap but says the meaning is not crap.

I could go on, but this sounds like 1984 bullshit.

And that's a big honking tell.

It's like the racist who wants to use the "N" word and starts preaching that there is a difference between the capital letter N and small case letter N. He does that just so he can keep repeating the racist word.

 

Anyway, I'm getting bored again. 

I'm  not going to be doing the verbal dueling anymore--certainly not within that cruddy frame--unless this goes off the rails into low-grade trolling again. I prefer to let readers come to their own conclusions. Enough is now visible, including in your criticisms of me, for them to use their brains according to their own thinking and not be fooled by anyone.

And to make sure this can happen without all that goddam noise, I threw a grenade into the word game propaganda bullshit.

Will they decide this way or that? Damned if I know. That's their business.

In other words, you will not control their thinking.

They will control their thinking.

Every one of them.

Michael

[Marc]

42 minutes ago, Mark said:

MSK has to put his comment over on this thread, where it has no relevance at all, so he can pretend "Gotcha."

I am an anti-semite. 

For the context see the full discussion in the ARI Watch thread.  I believe Ellen knows exactly what I mean when I say it.

 

They asked Bobby Fisher if he was an anti semite and he said no because semites are Arabic and Jews from that region, and I like Arabs and dont like Jews ( not an exact quote, but close ).

I dont mind non Jewish folks who dont like Jews , and hate Israel.

I really though hate the Jews who hate the Jews and Israel.

 

 

[Peter]

2 hours ago, Peter said:

What he deserved? Michael mentioned Ivermectin but I didn't read pastor the headline.

I just wanted to add that I deserve what happens to me because I got the vaccines. If I have to get another different type of shot or a booster, I will watch for reactions to it and then when I am sure it is the right thing for me to do, I will get that too. As far as alt medicine goes, help yourself if you think you are helping yourself. I know Ayn Rand would.  

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

26 minutes ago, Peter said:

As far as alt medicine goes...

Peter,

What the government is blocking is not "alt medicine."

It is mainstream medicine.

Michael

[Marc]

1 hour ago, Peter said:

I just wanted to add that I deserve what happens to me because I got the vaccines. If I have to get another different type of shot or a booster, I will watch for reactions to it and then when I am sure it is the right thing for me to do, I will get that too. As far as alt medicine goes, help yourself if you think you are helping yourself. I know Ayn Rand would.  

If Rand was alive , would she have taken the " vaccine" or would she be " anti vax" ?

Lets say she was 40 and healthy too.

 

[tmj]

Stents as prophylaxis, waiting on the science but feels almost right.

Heart Disease Facts | cdc.gov

WWW.CDC.GOV

---

Learn facts about how race, ethnicity, age, and other risk factors can contribute to heart disease risk.

 

[anthony]

16 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Peter,

What the government is blocking is not "alt medicine."

It is mainstream medicine.

Michael

True, ivermectin's been safely taken by humans since the 80's. Which makes CV vaccines the new kid on the "alt" block.

Whoever suppressed its use, superficially for invented health concerns, have deaths on their hands imo.

Study reporting +/- 90% "confidence level".

"A strong signal of therapeutic efficacy".

American Journal of Therapeutics

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjkhPiyhMT0AhXnQEEAHXScDBEQFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.lww.com%2Famericantherapeutics%2Ffulltext%2F2021%2F08000%2Fivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx&usg=AOvVaw1HTxemTXmcfnrX888RVH2s

[Mark]

Trump again boasts that he is responsible for the mRNA vaccines.  When Nigel Farage of GB News interviewed him at his Mar-a-Lago home:

“I brought the country to a level its never seen before, then we had Covid come in, then I brought it back, came up with vaccines that you're using, we’re all using, the world is using.”

stationgossip.com/2021/12/if-you-love-country-you-have-no-choice.html

(the above quote corrects a typo, were ==> we're)

[Peter]

7 hours ago, Marc said:

If Rand was alive , would she have taken the " vaccine" or would she be " anti vax" ?

Pro vax. She grew up in Russia and then Soviet Russia. She was rational. She probably understood medicine better than I do. So, I rationally chose medicine. Would she have chosen what medicine recommends? Of course, she would!   

[Peter]

1 hour ago, Mark said:

Trump again boasts that he is responsible for the mRNA vaccines.

What? You mean he's rational?

[tmj]

6 hours ago, Peter said:

Pro vax. She grew up in Russia and then Soviet Russia. She was rational. She probably understood medicine better than I do. So, I rationally chose medicine. Would she have chosen what medicine recommends? Of course, she would!   

Do you really think Rand would indulge in floating abstractions? " what medicine recommends"?

mRNA vaccine platforms are radically different than previous 'well' studied platforms , their use at this scale are truly 'experimental', the use of any leaky vaccine during the initial phase of a pandemic flies in the face of 'basic' virology. How is one supposed to reconcile that 'medicine' recommends the level of risk taking in using the novel platforms and especially against a pathogen with such a relatively low mortality rate?

"Medicine" says antibiotics stops or severely mitigates the consequences of bacterium growth, but "medicine" doesn't recommend "get the jab lose your right to x,y or z ( job, travel, ect)

[Marc]

1 hour ago, tmj said:

Do you really think Rand would indulge in floating abstractions? " what medicine recommends"?

mRNA vaccine platforms are radically different than previous 'well' studied platforms , their use at this scale are truly 'experimental', the use of any leaky vaccine during the initial phase of a pandemic flies in the face of 'basic' virology. How is one supposed to reconcile that 'medicine' recommends the level of risk taking in using the novel platforms and especially against a pathogen with such a relatively low mortality rate?

"Medicine" says antibiotics stops or severely mitigates the consequences of bacterium growth, but "medicine" doesn't recommend "get the jab lose your right to x,y or z ( job, travel, ect)

Yeah, I am with TMJ here on this one.

I think Rand would had already written five essays against this whole thing.

She saw the whole thing as a child and knew better than to blindly trust Gov't.

Edited December 2, 2021 by Marc

[anthony]

She would advise to rigorously research and use the best tools on hand according to your health needs. That some nostrum made in a laboratory isn't necessarily 'science' or medicine. And any in a free nation haven't any responsibility to 'society'; concern with your own life is paramount. She would be disgusted that the Motor of the World was slowed down and stilled for a naturally-occurring phenomenon. That man's life, upright, rational and independent, is the standard of value, not a quasi-existence in submission to all others and Govt. authority. For the intimidation through livelihoods by corporations and force by state bureaucrats to impose on their freedom of action and sacrifice all the able and healthy and the youth to acquiesce to locking up, and then vaccinating every individual for the "common good" that is probably not 'good' for many, regardless of his/her free will and choices and individual rights, she would call what it is, the evil: altruism.