What if......?


Recommended Posts

Here is a What If to conjure with.  What if Achmed, Faisal and Ibrihim  drove and 18 wheeler filled with high explosive through the Lincoln Tunnel at rush hour and blow themselves up while at the middle of the tunnel?   What do you think the U.S. would do  (1) under our current Prince Obama  (2)  under Queen Hillary   and (3) Under The Donald?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BaalChatzaf said:

Here is a What If to conjure with.  What if Achmed, Faisal and Ibrihim  drove and 18 wheeler filled with high explosive through the Lincoln Tunnel at rush hour and blow themselves up while at the middle of the tunnel?   What do you think the U.S. would do  (1) under our current Prince Obama  (2)  under Queen Hillary   and (3) Under The Donald?  

I will assume that Achmed and Faisal and Ibrihm are muslims. Then Prince Obama would say Islam is a peaceful religion and Queen Hillary would bring more muslims into the country and Donald would load them into boxcars.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jts said:

I will assume that Achmed and Faisal and Ibrihm are muslims. Then Prince Obama would say Islam is a peaceful religion and Queen Hillary would bring more muslims into the country and Donald would load them into boxcars.

 

More and more I think about voting for Trump.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BaalChatzaf said:

More and more I think about voting for Trump.

Bob,

Nah... Don't do that.

Why on earth would you do a damn fool thing like that?

Sit it out and let Clinton win. Be proud that you refused on principle to do the only thing you could have done to keep her from office.

Then enjoy the exciting explosions around New York (and elsewhere) as they go off. Just so long as you or your loved ones are not near one, why sweat it? 

You'll get free entertainment along with the pride of knowing you did not impede it when there was one little thing you could have done.

Then sleep like a baby in your righteousness...

:) 

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Bob,

Nah... Don't do that.

Why on earth would you do a damn fool thing like that?

Sit it out and let Clinton win. Be proud that you refused on principle to do the only thing you could have done to keep her from office.

Then enjoy the exciting explosions around New York (and elsewhere) as they go off. Just so long as you or your loved ones are not near one, why sweat it? 

You'll get free entertainment along with the pride of knowing you did not impede it when there was one little thing you could have done.

Then sleep like a baby in your righteousness...

:) 

Michael

After the Nice Massacre  my blood got hot.  It is 9/12/2001 all over again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Bob,

If Hillary Clinton wins and keeps President Obama's immigration policy in place, I hope you like it when your blood gets hot. There will be a lot of it...

:)

Michael

Hillary may be elected President but she will not be our Queen.  Congress will have a bit to say about immigration....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Like with President Obama?

:evil: 

Michael

Let us first see what Congress consists of after the election.  Then we may wonder about that.  

My guess is that if Lady Rodham has her way we will have trucks running over Americans on our own turf.  Then we shall see how Congress reacts. 

I am not feeling particularly optimistic regardless of  how the election comes out.  The country is fucked up and it may require blood to get people to focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BaalChatzaf said:

The country is fucked up and it may require blood to get people to focus.

True.  But if they lack even a minimal understanding of the political principles that support liberty, that blood generated focus may take them in one of the many wrong directions (fascism, socialism, strong-man?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SteveWolfer said:

True.  But if they lack even a minimal understanding of the political principles that support liberty, that blood generated focus may take them in one of the many wrong directions (fascism, socialism, strong-man?).

Such  has been known to happen.  Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SteveWolfer said:

True.  But if they lack even a minimal understanding of the political principles that support liberty, that blood generated focus may take them in one of the many wrong directions (fascism, socialism, strong-man?).

Exactly so. Many of us have prepared for it with practical measures, little Gulches everywhere, far from U.S. cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wolfdevoon said:

Many of us have prepared for it with practical measures

Yes... and even if change were in the right direction, change can be very turbulent and there can be short periods of violent civil unrest and the cities would be risky places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BaalChatzaf said:

Here is a What If to conjure with.  What if Achmed, Faisal and Ibrihim  drove and 18 wheeler filled with high explosive through the Lincoln Tunnel at rush hour and blow themselves up while at the middle of the tunnel?   What do you think the U.S. would do  (1) under our current Prince Obama  (2)  under Queen Hillary   and (3) Under The Donald?  

I don't know, but you might have successfully got yourself on some kind of watch list  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BaalChatzaf said:

The country is fucked up and it may require blood to get people to focus.

Ba'al,

I've said to a few people that what might be the reason of the divisiveness and ill will toward other men in our country is because we haven't been involved in a large scale war for a while--that we might need a common enemy to find out how much Americans have in common...  realizing this sounds Heraclitian, unfortunately many people in the US don't have the self-initiative to do that and need a jolt.

This kind of strife and change wouldn't apply to people who would want to and can change for the good on their own.  I'd much rather see people self-conscientiousness enough to change themselves and change this country for the good from the inside-out, without bloodshed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KorbenDallas said:

I don't know, but you might have successfully got yourself on some kind of watch list  :)

How?  By speculating what DAESH might do?  If our "protectors" did more speculation we might be safer for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KorbenDallas said:

Ba'al,

 

This kind of strife and change wouldn't apply to people who would want to and can change for the good on their own.  I'd much rather see people self-conscientiousness enough to change themselves and change this country for the good from the inside-out, without bloodshed...

Futile.  The path of evil might just be the way to achieve good.  Perverse thought,  yes???  I can almost sympathize with God  for bringing The Flood. If enough innocent people die it might be a way of getting at the Bad Guys. Marvelously perverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KorbenDallas said:

I don't know, but you might have successfully got yourself on some kind of watch list  :)

 

10 hours ago, BaalChatzaf said:

How?  By speculating what DAESH might do?  If our "protectors" did more speculation we might be safer for it?

Well we need more intelligence gathering...  intelligence gathering to find the enemy and put bullets through their chest.  "Protection" without enforcement isn't protection at all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KorbenDallas said:

Ba'al,

 

This kind of strife and change wouldn't apply to people who would want to and can change for the good on their own.  I'd much rather see people self-conscientiousness enough to change themselves and change this country for the good from the inside-out, without bloodshed...

 

11 hours ago, BaalChatzaf said:

Futile.  The path of evil might just be the way to achieve good.  Perverse thought,  yes???  I can almost sympathize with God  for bringing The Flood. If enough innocent people die it might be a way of getting at the Bad Guys. Marvelously perverse.

Look to history to find the path of evil, tap into some of that antecedental knoweldge of Mankind to start developing principles of what doesn't work, and what does.  Most people won't do that, can't do that (maybe don't know to do that), and end up with a savage dog-eat-dog worldview and live everyday by a perversion of Americanism.  I think these people need more Reason than strife, and I would like a reemergence to be Reason, Art, and Individualism rather than a mental enslavement to one another, leading to more hate and bloodshed..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now