Hastert Indictment


Recommended Posts

Good points here: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/06/03/so-evading-government-scrutiny-is-a-crime-why/

"What if the government installed surveillance cameras on various streets in a municipality and then made it a crime to walk along a route that skirted those cameras?"

You'd think the fourth amendment would actually mean something:

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

"Probable cause" is not a paranoid blanket suspicion of every citizen, else you may as well throw out the entire amendment because it means nothing. "Shall not be violated" becomes a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now