What happend to solo passion

[Brant Gaede]

I was pleasantly surprised by the warm welcome I received when I first came on board. (Brant made me laugh "fee fie fo fum..!"

Give it back, Jack. No recycling allowed.

--Brant

once is enough

[Jules Troy]

Ha!

[Flea]

John Kim, a.k.a. Madmax/Doug Bandler, is dripping more of his diseased drivel over in SOLO. For example:

"BTW, the fact that Charlize Theron did not reproduce her stunning Nordic genetics is a true crime (Google her up to see interviews she gives in Afrikaner; ie Dutch. What a stunning Aryan woman). To see her with her adopted black African "son" makes me want to cry. I don't care how much a person wants to preach "individualism" but if whites do become extinct, women like Charlize Theron bear partial responsibility. She didn't earn her Nordic beauty. She was bequeathed it. And she betrayed it."

In other words, he says to Theron, "You didn't build that." A woman's beauty isn't due to her own activities but is purely due to genetics, and so it belongs to the race and shouldn't be betrayed by choosing not to have children. That is, "Du bist nichts; dein Volk ist alles." And you know, that Hitler chap wasn't really so bad. He had his reasons, and they were good reasons:

"And an objective study of WW2 and Hitler would lead to the conclusion that the Nazis were in large part a response to the *Jewish dominated* Communist movement which was responsible for the mass starvation of tens of millions of gentiles (Ukraine and Armenia, etc). The Jews as Communists engineered the slaughter of over 20 million Christians. The Nazis paid them back by killing 4-6 million Jews. If you dig deep into any attempted mass slaughter you will always find a deeply seated ethnic grudge. And such grudges are often not arbitrary. There are legitimate reasons people have ethnic hatred."

So yeah, the Jews just had it coming. Here's a snapshot of SOLO "culture" in a week or so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Mg6Gfh9Co

[william.scherk]

That deep gurgling sound you hear is the drains at SOLO Sewerage Works processing bigotry and fanaticism.

Poor old Lindsay Perigo turned his website into a lair of the demented, with clobberhead 'Boug Dandler' leading a surge into Lower Regions. Lower, lower, and then lower still. It is sad and embarrassing to see old friends like Neil Parille participating there -- participating on the side of Boug's 'racialist sense.'

Gurgle.

Depressing, perhaps, to see the Good Ship Reason torn apart by bigotry and fear and stupidity. There is no upside, to my eyes. The situation is not even funny enough or tragic enough or karmic enough to make the whole wet sucking sound anything other than sad and pitiful.

Thanks, Flea, for monitoring the sewerage and its outfall.

[Roger Bissell]

Coupla comments:

1. Charlize Theron was, is, and probably always will be my favorite African-American.

2. Being happily married, I find I have very little need for "solo passion."

REB

[Jules Troy]

Needless to say, I drop in from time to time.

And then? I leave...

[william.scherk]

Gurgle. I read the full linked article again. I went to the Cabaret video scene with blond Aryan youth singing a sweet song of tomorrow. I read the portents. I read the offending article again. I think of the new composting toilets at the home show. I think of Trog. I think of some wicked clogs I am missing in the drains below other online articles. I go pour caustics down all our drains. All of them. Then I read the article one more time.

It doesn't go down any better even with the Principle of Charity or the Disagreement Hierarchy or guessing Doug's score on the Right-Wing Authoritarian Test. It does not survive the Translation Test. It is just a spew of fear of the end of white people. Deranged. It doesn't swirl, it doesn't sink. It floats, and foams and seems to colonize all surfaces with contaminant. Do I want this kind of person on my boat? If necessary, can we later Osama him?

Here's our 44 year-old B-Dandler discovering he will never likely spawn an empire or a child or much beyond a fake name and face at an online hate sink:

"There are grave stakes at play here. Not to mention the potential end of the white European genotype. If caring about that makes me Hitler, then long live Hitler."

The only thing that can cleanse my palate after reading Hate Boy is an equally odious thing, a thing of greater power, great German sappy lieder, from the maddest of the mad German superstars, Heino, with a medley of his nationalist songs from 2007.

This is how Nazi-lovers who do it right end up, Doug. Loved, lavished with ladies, and loving all things meaty and sweet and white and full of German gemutlichkeit. If only Doug had understood that gemutlichkeit comes not by fear but by self-confidence and comfort. How sad that he is not at peace, and sees only apocalypse for his Folk.

In case you refuse to watch five minutes of Heino, just see it as a Trump rally, with unity and happiness and white people having fun being white. Of course, Heino-Trump may so love sheer Germanosity he seems utterly bizarre, but hey. Listen along and you will get a reward at the Heino-Trump rally at the four minute mark, when Mexico is mentioned in song, and the brown people start dancing in their colorful outfits and horns blare. Mexico, senoritas, love of country, love of white sausage and gemutlichkeit and unity trumpery. It is a show-stopper. When I am next on the line with the Trump campaign in Iowa I am going to recommend they watch them some Heino Live in 2007.

Edited January 22, 2016 by william.scherk

[Jules Troy]

Not to worry Bill I don't think poor Doug has found Mrs. White to breed with in order to save "the race".

[Jonathan]

It is just a spew of fear of the end of white people. Deranged. It doesn't swirl, it doesn't sink. It floats, and foams and seems to colonize all surfaces with contaminant.

It'll be okay, Billy. Just walk away. SOLO is now nothing. It's less than nothing. It's over.

In case you refuse to watch five minutes of Heino, just see it as a Trump rally, with unity and happiness and white people having fun being white.

It reminds me more of Obama rallies during his first run, leaving aside the superficial differences of skin color and specific aesthetic style. It's got the same sort of creepy cult of personality herd mentality to it. The same gaga dazes. The only things missing are the fake temple pillars, people passing out from charisma/star power overload, and teleprompters.

J

[George H. Smith]

Years ago I posted frequently on SOLO. At first I was treated cordially, even courted, probably because Atheism: The Case Against God is pretty well known in O'ist circles. But that didn't last long. After I defended anarchism and, even worse, criticized James Valliant's book, The Passion of Ayn Rand's Critics, which had achieved the status of Holy Scripture on SOLO, I became the chief target for a while. Most of the criticisms were exceptionally lame, so I posted the comment, "I don't know how you people make it through a meal without stabbing yourself in the face with a fork." I suppose that didn't help matters any. 8-)

Ghs

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

George,

LOL...

And what makes you think some of them knew what a fork was?

Michael

[Mark]

There’s some truth in the first part of what Flea quoted of Bandler. The communist movement was indeed a jewish movement whose leaders in Russia systematically murdered millions of people. (Google Leon Trotsky, Lev Kamenev, Grigory Zinoviev, Genrikh Yagoda, Leonid Reichman, or Lazar Kaganovich – the spelling of the names varies.) Bandler is wrong to restrict their victims to gentiles though naturally almost all were. Bandler goes off the deep end with the payback business.

In the 1930s it looked very possible that the Soviets would invade Germany and that a fifth column would help them. The Nazis used that legitimate fear to gain power. Though it wasn’t the only reason they got control it was a major factor – never mentioned in Peikoff’s book by the way.

Hitler was rotten without the exaggerations of jewish historians.

[Neil Parille]

SOLO used to be a much higher traffic site. Remember all the people who used to post there - Robert Campbell, Jim Valliant, Dr. Diana, Ph.D., Casey Fahy, Fred Weiss, Amy Peikoff, etc.?

For me the highlight was Jim Valliant. I love this:

Placing a word or phrase within quotation marks does not indicate that the word or phrase is even a quotation, verbatim or otherwise. Even if it is a partial quotation, it is not uncommon to reorder the used words within a phrase, so long as the meaning remains intact. The result is not a "misquoatation." In these cases, the alleged "misquotations" did not change the meaning of either -- and we've been given no reason to think that they did, just the assertion that they did.

* * *

In any event, such re-ordered wording is standard practice -- so long as the meaning is undistorted -- and these instances accurately conveyed the meaning of both. (Indeed, I got high grades from professors when I did just this with their own words, both as an undergraduate and as graduate student.)

Jim also had the inability to follow a simple argument. You'd "quoat" something from another person and he would inexplicably attribute it to you, for example.

As far as Jews and communism goes, it's interesting, In addition to the names Mark mentioned, there was Kurt Eisner and Bela Kun (born Bela Kohn). Lenin was 1/4 Jewish.

On the other hand, the libertarian and Objectivist movement has had plenty of Jews such a Rand, Rothbard, von Mises, etc. I think you find Jews "over-represented" in most movements.

Interesting Yaron Brook and even Harry Binswanger - both of whom support open immigration even if it turns Europe Islamic - are opposed to open immigration for Israel.

[Jonathan]

SOLO used to be a much higher traffic site. Remember all the people who used to post there - Robert Campbell, Jim Valliant, Dr. Diana, Ph.D., Casey Fahy, Fred Weiss, Amy Peikoff, etc.?

For me the highlight was Jim Valliant. I love this:

Placing a word or phrase within quotation marks does not indicate that the word or phrase is even a quotation, verbatim or otherwise. Even if it is a partial quotation, it is not uncommon to reorder the used words within a phrase, so long as the meaning remains intact. The result is not a "misquoatation." In these cases, the alleged "misquotations" did not change the meaning of either -- and we've been given no reason to think that they did, just the assertion that they did.

* * *

In any event, such re-ordered wording is standard practice -- so long as the meaning is undistorted -- and these instances accurately conveyed the meaning of both. (Indeed, I got high grades from professors when I did just this with their own words, both as an undergraduate and as graduate student.)

Has anyone here watched Making a Murderer? It's freaking infuriating. It shows how incompetent, corrupt, unjust and irrational the police, investigators, prosecutors, FBI "expert" witnesses, court-appointed attorneys, judges and jury were in the Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey cases. It's fucking insane. Having watched the series, and now seeing Valliant's name again, makes me wonder how much injustice may have been done in his time as a prosecutor due to his "quoating" people in court or using similar slimy, greasy inventions of his which he felt were perfectly acceptable and normal. Just think of what a whirlwind of tainted and misused evidence and resources his silly book about TheBrandens™ was, and apply that same drooling beast twisted thinking and passion to a criminal case. Scary.

Jim also had the inability to follow a simple argument. You'd "quoat" something from another person and he would inexplicably attribute it to you, for example.

A good example of that is given in the What a Dipshit thread here on OL. Heh. Seriously moronic dipshittery.

J

[Brant Gaede]

It's okay to shoot Sam instead of Al. As long as someone gets killed call Al, Sam and Sam, Al.

--Brant

only the body count matters

maybe his profs didn't bother reading his stuff and just stamped on the grade matching their preconceptions of him as a student

[Neil Parille]

Jonathan,

I remember you mentioning the dipshit post when Cathy and Valliant appeared on SOLO in 2013.

When I pointed out Valliant's error he then descended (as usual) into incoherence:

____

As anyone can read below, Gregster suggested that Mr. Parille had once "insinuated" that O'Connor was gay, but then recalled that this insinuation was from a review (of a Rand biography) that Parille had used. Mr. Parille was thus being challenged about his use of that book review because it had suggested something dubious. Parille then posted the following as his answer to Gregster:

"I'm certain the reason I called it to Linz's attention was the following: ..."

This was Parille zeroing in on the part of the review that he seemingly endorsed. If there was something else that he found dubious that was the moment he should've said so. Indeed it was his responsibility, at that point, to say so.

It is Mr. Parille's "way" to drop all context, pretend that he had not said what, in fact, he actually just did.

____

Huh?

[Brant Gaede]

I never could figure out the rationality behind JV's quoting technique. I don't recall any except others doing it too--sort of like a reverse or inverse argumentum ad hominem.

Why do it unless you're up to no good and/or incompetent and lazy?

--Brant

sorry for stating something so blatantly obvious, but sometimes the blatant deserves its own special notation if not monument

[Jonathan]

Jonathan,

I remember you mentioning the dipshit post when Cathy and Valliant appeared on SOLO in 2013.

When I pointed out Valliant's error he then descended (as usual) into incoherence:

____

As anyone can read below, Gregster suggested that Mr. Parille had once "insinuated" that O'Connor was gay, but then recalled that this insinuation was from a review (of a Rand biography) that Parille had used. Mr. Parille was thus being challenged about his use of that book review because it had suggested something dubious. Parille then posted the following as his answer to Gregster:

"I'm certain the reason I called it to Linz's attention was the following: ..."

This was Parille zeroing in on the part of the review that he seemingly endorsed. If there was something else that he found dubious that was the moment he should've said so. Indeed it was his responsibility, at that point, to say so.

It is Mr. Parille's "way" to drop all context, pretend that he had not said what, in fact, he actually just did.

____

Huh?

Weird.

J

[Flea]

In a bit of free time, I read some of John Kim a.k.a. Madmax/Doug Bandler's older postings at SOLO Passion. At the risk of beating a brain-dead ass, I'll share this bit of what is either stupid ignorance (stupid in that he didn't even check Wikipedia for basic facts) or a deliberate lie--though in that case probably a deliberate lie he stole from some slightly less stupid driveler, since he doesn't seem to have the "brain power...or temperament to create" anything original:

"Blacks do not have the brain power at the population level nor the temperament to create advanced civilizations. I know, that is a depressing assertion but one clearly obvious by a study of history. When the blacks finally conquered Egypt during the 26th Dynasty, they ruled over a mixed race society. That ancient civilization would come to and end. There would be no 27th Dynasty."

What he meant was the 25th Dynasty (760-656 BC), a period when Egypt had been taken over by the Nubians. It was in fact a period of restoration of traditional Egyptian culture that, contrary to Kim's assertions, was followed by the native 26th Dynasty, which ruled for 140 or so years--it was then succeeded by what Kim declares to have not existed, the 27th Dynasty, which was a period of Persian rule, followed in turn by three more native dynasties and finally the last Persian dynasty before conquest by Alexander the Great. Well, John Kim seems really intent on claiming himself to be a fully pure member of a superior white race, but if he even is, I guess the intelligence genes didn't get transmitted or expressed in his case.