anthony Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Yes, Ye Olde English. It goes down with that other one I used to puzzle over:"You can't see the wood for the trees".Wood? What wood?Ah - "woods". As in, you can't see the *forest* for the trees.Tony:The only way I ever heard it was:You can't see the forest for the trees.AdamAdam, you had the benefit of a smartened-up literature, apparently. I had the archaic kind.I don't know if 'Americanization' of the language was always logical or consistent,but in the main I've learned plenty of respect for it.(Was reading US novelists since young.)
blackhorse Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 "Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding."---George Washington
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now