Had to google as I wasn't sure whether you were truly just making-up this term "Cigarette Bags" as I'd never heard it before nor do I think of "under-eye aesthetics" as a chief visual indication of a smoker (and this concept that Public Smokers - unsure why you capitalized those words there...-are "rotten, uncaring people" is just silly, smoking "in public" can be a rotten, uncaring act - it could also be a no-harm action, depending on the context.....not as black&white as you're trying to make it)
Anyways, is that post some rhetorical style that's flying over my head or are you serious? The vaporizing-nicotine devices are incredibly likely to have a non-zero impact on health and frankly I don't think I've ever met someone who argued against that, but for you to talk about how "comical" it is that people are addicted is just cold, am trying to re-read it in a way that doesn't make you seem like you're mocking people for self-harming, addictive tendencies that they're trying to work against (if they're using a vaporizer instead of smoking cigarettes)
And just FYI there's no 'smoke' when someone's vaporizing, they're...ahem...vaporizing, not combusting('smoking'), their drug- saying you "see a vapor smoker" is, to use Rand's words, "is a contradiction-in-terms" ?
