basimpson22 Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 (edited) Yeah, explain the disintegration of the twin towers. Steel and concrete easily melt when collided with more steel and concrete. There's another expirement you might like to try. That should explain why there was molten steel at ground zero months after the initial "collapse" I hope you'll pull your head out of your ass before watching this Edited March 19, 2011 by Aristocrates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Airplanes are almost completely made of aluminum which easily melts in a fire.If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, where did it go to?My theory is a duck flew into the building setting off a secondary explosion of illegally stored explosives to be used in a military coup.--Brantdidn't you guys ever watch "Seven Days in May"?I'll give you a blue tip wrench and time you on melting a boeing 757. Hell, I'll give you a flame thrower and time you. We'll call it, "make the boeing disappear". Now come on Brant! Why don't you but a little effort into your defense? That must explain the towers too since they were made of aluminum. No, they were made of tin right?! That's how they collapsed in on themselves. They were built with progressively more massive tin so the heaviest point of the building was at the top. Yep, that explains why both buildings collapsed on themselves. Thank you Brant. Really, truly, I've been blessed to learn that an objectivist best and most irrefutable arguments are those made purely of sarcasm.You're welcome.Decades ago a small plane took off, crashed and burned at a New York airport I flew out of. The airplane frame completely burned up. The remains of the pilot weighed 73 pounds. If you really knew what you were talking about, I'd address that.--Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjw Posted March 19, 2011 Author Share Posted March 19, 2011 Yeah, explain the disintegration of the twin towers. Steel and concrete easily melt when collided with more steel and concrete. There's another expirement you might like to try. That should explain why there was molten steel at ground zero months after the initial "collapse"What do you think of this?:http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htmShayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caroljane Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 [quote name='Aristocrates' timestamp='1300512512' post='} There's another expirement you might like to try..Expirement is the word all right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basimpson22 Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 (edited) the word i spelled wrong. Yes, thank you for your oh so valuable commentary. Edited March 19, 2011 by Aristocrates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basimpson22 Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 (edited) I think you've given a great source for a material scientist who believes the towers were turned into pyroclastic dust through the force of gravity. Hard to believe I used to jump out of that hayloft as a kid. Its a wonder my legs didn't explode on impact. Edited March 19, 2011 by Aristocrates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now