Kimmler Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 We all know that Obama is a socialist and we all know that socialism always ends in the gulag, the gas chamber and in a blood field full of rice.So, putting two and two together I just wondered if anyone here has a time line for when America is going to end up in the gulag, the gas chamber and in a blood field full of rice?I e-mailed the White House and they said that don’t worry, Obama is not a socialist and the Democrats are not a socialist party. Obama has no plans for America to end up in the gulag, the gas chamber and in a blood field full of rice. I then put it to him that Obama does have plans for America to end up in the gulag, the gas chamber and in a blood field full of rice as he is a narcissistic Socialist who hates the prime movers. He then e-mailed me back saying If I was so clever did I have a time line for that.Well…he had me there, but I bet you lot do have a time line for when America will end up like that.Helps out here and let me put one over on this little White house squirt. Give me a time line and then he print off his e-mails, get a plate, a knife and fork and eat his words. So anyone out there who can answer me these questions three:When will America end up?1) In a gulag2) In a gas chamber3) In a field of rice and bloodI’d love to be a fly on the wall when that jobsworth gets this time line…ha ha ha as lets face it when it happens (questions 1 – 3) he will be the first go, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 You need to hire a writer dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbeaulieu Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 You need to hire a writer dude.That was a bit hard to digest. I doubt, very seriously, that any of those three would ever happen. Sure, the government has its issues. But the people would not let such events come to pass.~ Shane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 You need to hire a writer dude.That was a bit hard to digest. I doubt, very seriously, that any of those three would ever happen. Sure, the government has its issues. But the people would not let such events come to pass.~ ShaneShane:Steven was just making a banal attempt to deride my "exaggeration" about the final result of marxist or fascist countries. I agree that it would be very difficult here, but not impossible. I would guesstimate less than five (5%) or ten (10%) percent. He substitutes [democratic] "socialism" into my phrasing to achieve a pretty pitiful piece of attempted satire. I think he could be charged with "impersonating a satirist" and be found guilty by a jury of his peers.Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Engle Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 I do not think you were in any of those places, er . . . in the first place. But, if you were, it is only the fault of those first places that they did not get you to at least the "second place."Know whattuh meen?rdeSomeday, Gawd will-uh puth them thahr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 8, 2010 Author Share Posted December 8, 2010 I'm confused...Obama is a socialist right? Socialism always ends in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood drenched paddy field. Yet...no one can give me a time line for this to happen in America? Why not? The people won't allow it? Why can't Obama, like the other socialists just make this (ending) happen? Why did the American people vote in a socialist president? Have they ever done this before? If so, why didn't that end in the gulag, gas chamber and blood drenched paddy field?All I need to know is:Obama is a socialist yes/no?Socialism always end in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood soaked paddy field yes/no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Socialism always end in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood soaked paddy field yes/no?No. Sweden is socialist and they have no gulags there. What a socialist system produces more often than not is mediocrity and boredom, not death.Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 8, 2010 Author Share Posted December 8, 2010 Socialism always end in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood soaked paddy field yes/no?No. Sweden is socialist and they have no gulags there. What a socialist system produces more often than not is mediocrity and boredom, not death.Ba'al ChatzafThere is no socialism in Sweden...as if there was there would be no money, buying or selling or a state and that is just for starters. Now all of these things exist here.But it you don't believe me then how can you explain this?http://www.happyplanetindex.org/explore/global/index.htmlGoing by this index there is more happiness in Sweden than there is in the US. Maybe the socialists there slip prozac in the water? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Socialism always end in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood soaked paddy field yes/no?No. Sweden is socialist and they have no gulags there. What a socialist system produces more often than not is mediocrity and boredom, not death.Ba'al ChatzafThere is no socialism in Sweden...as if there was there would be no money, buying or selling or a state and that is just for starters. Now all of these things exist here.But it you don't believe me then how can you explain this?http://www.happyplan...obal/index.htmlGoing by this index there is more happiness in Sweden than there is in the US. Maybe the socialists there slip prozac in the water?I can't explain a map that is based on either subjective or irrelevant data. How does one measure satisfaction?Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 8, 2010 Author Share Posted December 8, 2010 Socialism always end in the gulag, gas chamber & the blood soaked paddy field yes/no?No. Sweden is socialist and they have no gulags there. What a socialist system produces more often than not is mediocrity and boredom, not death.Ba'al ChatzafThere is no socialism in Sweden...as if there was there would be no money, buying or selling or a state and that is just for starters. Now all of these things exist here.But it you don't believe me then how can you explain this?http://www.happyplan...obal/index.htmlGoing by this index there is more happiness in Sweden than there is in the US. Maybe the socialists there slip prozac in the water?I can't explain a map that is based on either subjective or irrelevant data. How does one measure satisfaction?Ba'al ChatzafHow can you measure boredom? You state that socialism creates mediocrity. Yet the same could equally be said of objectivism or indeed any -ism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 How can you measure boredom? You state that socialism creates mediocrity. Yet the same could equally be said of objectivism or indeed any -ism.Good point. But that leaves the matter as a subjective judgment. A more objective way of seeing things is to count the number of people running from socialist states to non-socialist states versus the traffic in the opposite direction. How many people have actually fled Cuba or North Korea?I am thinking about Sweden's greatest export, Ingmar Bergman who fled Sweden because his tax rate went up to 105 percent of his top income bracket. In short, he was penalized for becoming rich. So he left. Sweden's loss. Our gain. Sweden is probably not an extreme socialist state because there is private ownership of the means of production, but there is a lot of government redistribution of income via taxation which is the low-calorie form of socialism practiced in Europe. Most likely people are too sensible, these days. to make the government the sole proprietor or even the main proprietor of productive capital. So they settle for the next "best" thing, to wit redistribution via taxation. Ba'al ChatzafBa'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 9, 2010 Author Share Posted December 9, 2010 From space you can see no borders. We, and previous generations, have built up a productive capacity that is more than sufficient to feed, clothe, shelter, educate and amuse everyone on the planet. The only barrier to its use for that purpose is that it exists as capital. The only basis for its continuing existence as capital is our continuing acceptance of capitalist and state property rights. From below, at the sharp end, in the worker’s-eye view, these look as obsolete and obscene as property rights in people. Without those rights, capital would just be machinery, that we all together already operate and improve upon every day, every minute, collectively and globally. The only way in which these rights can be permanently abolished is consciously, politically, collectively and globally, at one fell swoop. Not on the same day all over the world of course, but in the space of a few years, in one historical moment. And why not? Slavery and feudalism were in the end abolished, with a stroke of the pen followed if necessary by a stroke of the sword.Why should we not think, then, of the abolition of capitalism? We can’t reform it out of existence. Long experience, as well as theory and common sense, tell us this. Neither ‘socialist’ governments nor ‘communist’regimes have ever brought society a day nearer socialismor communism. There are many reasons why not, but thebasic reason is simple. Production for exchange can’t begradually reformed into production directly for use. Nor,in a world where almost everything is produced as partof a global division of labour, can it be abolished locallyin one community, or one country, or one continent. It’sall or nothing.Closely related to that reason is another. A society ofconscious and voluntary co-operation can’t beestablished unconsciously or unwillingly. It can’t beimposed from above or from outside or from behind ourbacks. Many will agree, if pressed, that the world cooperativecommonwealth can be thus establishedeventually, but not now. In the meantime, they wantsomething else: a society called socialism which retainswages, price, and profit but keeps them in the hands ofthe state and the state, they hope, in the hands of theworkers, which all too often means the hands of theworkers’ party, which all too often means in the hands ofthe correct leaders of the workers’ party. They wantthat, or they want steps in that direction. The cooperativecommonwealth itself is, they insist, for thedistant future.Why not now? We don’t need to wait for capitalismto increase productive capacity to the point where theco-operative commonwealth is possible, because it’salready done so, and it’s already the greatest barrier tothe use and expansion of the productive capacity thatexists. Why then should we vote for reforminggovernments to manage it, or ‘progressive’ regimes todevelop it further? Especially when these reforminggovernments and these ‘progressive’ regimes waste somuch of production, and so many of us, in war and slump.We have to make up our minds, once and for all, thatwe want rid of this system, for good and all. Let thosewho want to keep it reform it and improve it and expandit. It’s their job while it lasts. The job of those who wantto end it is to give such people not a vote, not a gun, nota penny, not a person, not an inch, not an ounce ofsupport. No political contender who is not a wageslavery abolitionist, nobody who advocates in word anddeed anything less than, and anything other than, thespeedy end of this system, and the consequentemancipation of the working class, deserves anotherminute of our time. To everyone who claims to wantsuch an end eventually, but advocates something other orsomething less in the meantime, we can say we’ve livedalready a long time in that meantime, and we’re still nonearer.All it would take to do away with this system andestablish the world co-operative commonwealth is formost people in the world to agree to do it. It’s no newsthat most people don’t. The number who understand andwant the commonwealth is tiny. The only revolutionaryaction worth the name is working to increase thatnumber. Nothing more is needed, and nothing less willdo.- Ken MacLeod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 From space you can see no borders. We, and previous generations, have built up a productive capacity that is more than sufficient to feed, clothe, shelter, educate and amuse everyone on the planet. Other than being absolutely absurd and specious, the border between North and South Korea at night is clear as a bell. Therefore, his first attempt at over generalizing fails.His second assertion is also unsupported, undefined and facially false. Adam Stopped reading the post after that start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 10, 2010 Author Share Posted December 10, 2010 Anyone got a time line for Obama & his 'socialist' brethren centralizing power and nationalising America's industries? I've e-mailed the White house but they won't tell me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 :When will America end up?1) In a gulag?How about financially and economically ruined?One cannot live beyond one's means forever. Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 10, 2010 Author Share Posted December 10, 2010 :When will America end up?1) In a gulag?How about financially and economically ruined?One cannot live beyond one's means forever. Ba'al ChatzafGreat. Time line please.BTW - I take it you believe that Obama is a socialist but don't believe that socialism ends up in the gulag, gas chamber or the blood soaked paddy field thingy. I checked out Sweden the other day but could not find the number of people who flee from there every year. Do you have the figure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 BTW - I take it you believe that Obama is a socialist but don't believe that socialism ends up in the gulag, gas chamber or the blood soaked paddy field thingy. I checked out Sweden the other day but could not find the number of people who flee from there every year. Do you have the figure?Very few. They have lo-calorie socialism aka left wing democratic socialism. They are willing to put up with a degree of collectivism and socialization that Americans would find absolutely unbearable. Just for the record, how many people are fleeing TO Sweden?As far as I am able to tell their greatest economic achievements have been the SAAB, the Volvo and ABBA.Sweden is a nice peaceful mediocre society. It does not make great contributions to human existence, and it is not an evil nasty place such as North Korea.Sweden is just right for the Swedes. Not too hot, not too cold. Just right. Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike11 Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Canada is socialist but lacks these evils.Then again we gave the world Celine Dion............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 13, 2010 Author Share Posted December 13, 2010 (edited) Canada is socialist but lacks these evils.Then again we gave the world Celine Dion............But you also gave us Bryan Adams...before everything I do he was brilliant.Canada is not socialist, it's a capitalist country. As is Sweden.As for the - How about financially and economically ruined?One cannot live beyond one's means forever. Am I going to get a time line? Edited December 13, 2010 by Kimmler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike11 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 As for the - How about financially and economically ruined?One cannot live beyond one's means forever. Am I going to get a time line?You know I was going to read post 12 in an effort to figure out how you are using the term Socialism. Then I realized given the jaded, angry and bitter nature of your posts I wouldn't waste time. Funny as I think ideologically I am closer to you than I am to the other posters.Are you getting your lulz here Kimmler? Is it even worth it for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ValueChaser Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 So is every Democratic President before Obama a socialist to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 So is every Democratic President before Obama a socialist to you?John:Steven is attempting to be clever by starting this thread. He does not succeed. Apparently he refuses to define socialism. I have asked him for an example of a socialist society and I am still waiting. Adamwelcome back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 :When will America end up?1) In a gulag2) In a gas chamber3) In a field of rice and bloodI'd love to be a fly on the wall when that jobsworth gets this time line…ha ha ha as lets face it when it happens (questions 1 – 3) he will be the first go, right?How about 4) in the poor house.Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 John,Yo.Good to see you again.Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimmler Posted December 15, 2010 Author Share Posted December 15, 2010 So is every Democratic President before Obama a socialist to you?Nay, nay and thrice nay!Not to me, but as for the others here...well don't hold your breath for them to answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now