BaalChatzaf Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Story about Nobel Award in science:Just an excerpt:STOCKHOLM — Two Russian-born scientists shared the Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for "groundbreaking experiments" with the thinnest, strongest material known to mankind — a carbon vital for the creation of faster computers and transparent touch screens.Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, professors at the University of Manchester in Britain, in 2004 isolated graphene, a form of carbon only one atom thick but more than 100 times stronger than steel, and showed it has exceptional properties, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.Experiments with graphene could lead to the development of new superstrong materials to make satellites, airplanes and cars, as well as innovative electronics, the academy said in announcing the 10 million kronor ($1.5 million) award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Story about Nobel Award in science:Just an excerpt:STOCKHOLM — Two Russian-born scientists shared the Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday for "groundbreaking experiments" with the thinnest, strongest material known to mankind — a carbon vital for the creation of faster computers and transparent touch screens.Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, professors at the University of Manchester in Britain, in 2004 isolated graphene, a form of carbon only one atom thick but more than 100 times stronger than steel, and showed it has exceptional properties, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.Experiments with graphene could lead to the development of new superstrong materials to make satellites, airplanes and cars, as well as innovative electronics, the academy said in announcing the 10 million kronor ($1.5 million) award. Krell metal! That'll do it!--Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDS Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 It's a miracle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted October 5, 2010 Share Posted October 5, 2010 Ba'al:I saw that this morning. Imagine how that will change the use of oil and transportation costs. Poor eco-environmental-thugs...another defeat to their anti-industrial agenda.Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 (edited) So now Bob can move beyond his oft-repeated critique of Galt’s motor qua perpetual motion machine to how Rearden Metal is incorrectly formulated. Here’s another one: how did they grow the tobacco to make the dollar sign cigarettes? Does tobacco grow in Colorado? Maybe in a greenhouse, but how could they grow enough to meet the demand from all those heroic Randian chainsmokers? Edited October 6, 2010 by Ninth Doctor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 So now Bob can move beyond his oft-repeated critique of Galt’s motor qua perpetual motion machine to how Rearden Metal is incorrectly formulated. Here’s another one: how did they grow the tobacco to make the dollar sign cigarettes? Does tobacco grow in Colorado? Maybe in a greenhouse, but how could they grow enough to meet the demand from all those heroic Randian chainsmokers?The cigarettes are manufactured in China from African tobacco and delivered by Fed Ex to Denver International where John Galt waits in his Cessna 210 turbo for the final leg to his Gultch. (I mean MM's.) One year there wasn't any because Ragnar accidentally sank a tobacco ship and had to spend two years lecturing on piracy at the University of Denver. This is where he met his wife, but I digress.--Brantknew you wanted to know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 knew you wanted to knowYou’re just making shit up! First of all, a Cessna 210 can’t handle the cargo, and that’s whether you calculate by weight or volume. You know how much those strikers smoke? Maybe a week’s supply could fit, no way a full month, and that's assuming that he's flying solo.Second, there’s a rule in the gulch about bringing in things from outside. I don’t remember how it went, but the upshot is that they were self-sustaining. Presumably they let Ragnar bring in gold to deposit in Mulligan’s bank, but beyond that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 knew you wanted to knowYou're just making shit up! First of all, a Cessna 210 can't handle the cargo, and that's whether you calculate by weight or volume. You know how much those strikers smoke? Maybe a week's supply could fit, no way a full month, and that's assuming that he's flying solo.Second, there's a rule in the gulch about bringing in things from outside. I don't remember how it went, but the upshot is that they were self-sustaining. Presumably they let Ragnar bring in gold to deposit in Mulligan's bank, but beyond that?You've been hookwinkled by Randian mythology. Get your reality right or walk the plank of rationality lest Ragnar keelhaul you.--Brantturn his warship into a passenger ship--what nonsense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 (edited) Show me where, in the Atlas Shrugged valley chapters, anyone eats a dessert made with coconut. QED. Edited October 6, 2010 by Ninth Doctor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I know! Passenger pigeons could carry one pack each! A million birds, a million packs! Using GPS they could drop them all on G.G.--Brantthe obvious tends to elude me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I know! Passenger pigeons could carry one pack each! A million birds, a million packs! Using GPS they could drop them all on G.G.--Brantthe obvious tends to elude meThe ray shield would burn them up. You need to think it through! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I know! Passenger pigeons could carry one pack each! A million birds, a million packs! Using GPS they could drop them all on G.G.--Brantthe obvious tends to elude meThe ray shield would burn them up. You need to think it through!The cigarettes are specially packaged. It's the bird shit that gets burned up.--Brantyou didn't know those birds were extinct, did you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 you didn't know those birds were extinct, did you?Actually, yes I did. I was trying to limit myself to truly trenchant critiques. You could easily substitute another species of avian, after all. A California Condor could deliver them by the carton, if not by the case. Imagine the endangered species police coming in after one gets fried by the ray shield. To the gulag with all the strikers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 you didn't know those birds were extinct, did you?Actually, yes I did. I was trying to limit myself to truly trenchant critiques. You could easily substitute another species of avian, after all. A California Condor could deliver them by the carton, if not by the case. Imagine the endangered species police coming in after one gets fried by the ray shield. To the gulag with all the strikers.Too late! The time to say so was before I GOTCHA!--Brantgotcha twice! I'm so frickin' shallow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 One of the two Nobel winners is quoted extensively in a Guardian story published today. He is quite an amusing, light-hearted fellow -- apparently the only person to have won both a Nobel Prize and an IgNoble prize !!The Guardian article contains his plaint that proposed UK cuts to science are just what the UK does not need if it wants to maintain its place in the rankings of scientific innovation. I highlight a few parts of the story that don't rant on about the need for state support of research; in the Objectivish Valhalla to come, of course, research similar to that done by the Nobel team would be accomplished under capitalism -- though this is disputed by at least one Marxist/Fascist looter in comments following the story.Geim is regarded as a playful and highly creativephysicist who once published a scientific paper thatwas co-authored by his pet hamster, Tisha. In otherwork, he proved that it was possible to levitatefrogs using magnetic fields.Geim and Novoselov's breakthrough came in adeceptively simple experiment in 2004 that involveda block of carbon and some Scotch tape. The two usedthe tape to strip off layers of carbon that wereonly one atom thick. These thin wafers of carbon,known as graphene, were found to have extraordinaryproperties.[ . . . ]Geim encouraged creative experiments at thelaboratory, Novoselov said. "We'd just try crazythings and sometimes they worked and sometimes not.Graphene was one of those that worked from the verybeginning. It's such a robust material and all theeffects were so pronounced."Despite winning the prize, Novoselov said he wasplanning to work in other areas of physics and wasconsidering taking a year or two of sabbaticalleave. "All this graphene business is very exciting,but we've been doing it a while and we're trying todiversify from it and establish some newdirections," he said. "I really like it here andwant to do my research in Manchester."[ . . . ]The Nobel committee said of the two scientists inits press release: "Playfulness is one of theirhallmarks. With the building blocks they had attheir disposal they attempted to create somethingnew, sometimes even by just allowing their brains tomeander aimlessly."Link to full story here. Comment by socialist swine below.Wait? What's this? A basic research project whichhas yielded a result which should change all ourlives for the better? Centrally funded through aresearch council?Yet another example of how government funding ofscience is vital Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 Here is what Brian Cox had to say about the two Russians who won the Nobel Prize for their work with graphene:Brian Cox, a physicist at Manchester University who works on the Large Hadron Collider at Cern near Geneva, said: "I remember when Andrei Geim started at Manchester in 2001. At that time, UK universities were just beginning to feel the effects of the government's enhanced commitment to science: the mood was optimistic and universities were looking to hire the best young scientists from across the world."Andrei was such a scientist, and together with Konstantin Novoselov, they have received the highest award in international science for the curiosity-driven discovery of graphene, a material that has the potential to change the world and generate immense economic benefits. This is what UK science is all about – a world-leading success story that must be treasured and supported for the future."Cox went on to say that Geim and Novoselvov were the fookin' smartest applied physicists he had ever met. (/just joking)Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I'm so frickin' shallowYou’ll get no argument from me on that point. BTW, there are no California Condors in Colorado…if you knew that you’d have said so, therefore you didn’t know, which means you just learned something, and also that I’m the winner of this one-upmanship contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I'm so frickin' shallowYou'll get no argument from me on that point. BTW, there are no California Condors in Colorado…if you knew that you'd have said so, therefore you didn't know, which means you just learned something, and also that I'm the winner of this one-upmanship contest. There are in Arizona. Your arguments by asseveration are pathetic. Isn't there anyone in this bar who can fight?--BrantI knew it but my eyes glazed over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 Isn't there anyone in this bar who can fight?Ah well, beware ye coarse ruffian, for I am a gentleman! Oh and BTW, beware the quality of my foot work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 Isn't there anyone in this bar who can fight?Ah well, beware ye coarse ruffian, for I am a gentleman! Oh and BTW, beware the quality of my foot work. Like Nathaniel Branden I am Not a gentleman. Unlike Nathaniel Branden I did Not sleep with That Woman!Now please explain what This has to do with California Condors in Arizona, but Not in Colorado, dropping cartoons of Yuan-sign cigarettes on Galt's Gulch and why John Galt would do business with the Chin-coms.--Branttaking it all to my grave--all of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9thdoctor Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Now please explain what This has to do with California Condors in Arizona, but Not in Colorado, dropping cartoons of Yuan-sign cigarettes on Galt's Gulch and why John Galt would do business with the Chin-coms.I can't explain, you've lost me. How did this Arizona motif get introduced? I'm going to have to accuse you of asseveration by non sequitur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Now please explain what This has to do with California Condors in Arizona, but Not in Colorado, dropping cartoons of Yuan-sign cigarettes on Galt's Gulch and why John Galt would do business with the Chin-coms.I can't explain, you've lost me. How did this Arizona motif get introduced? I'm going to have to accuse you of asseveration by non sequitur.I live in Arizona with my very own California Condor.--Brantyou had to go ask--I didn't want anyone to know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfgreaves Posted October 10, 2010 Share Posted October 10, 2010 Yet another example of how government funding ofscience is vitalBill,You're wrong about that. You may have missed a third possiblefunding model, besides science-for-profit and public funding:philanthropic endowments, such as for universities and researchfoundations like HHMI.Government has no place funding research unless it relates toa proper function of the state.Rand did allow for the legitimacy of charity, but it is truethat she did not emphasize it's importance enough. It iscertainly true that science-for-profit will not answer allof our questions for us.Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
equality72521 Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 When I read this post my first thought was "This is John Galt speaking." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now