BaalChatzaf Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 Please have a look at this: Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 Gee, Bob, all that Aristotle studying you did last year and all you really needed to do was watch this silly little video.--Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted August 8, 2010 Author Share Posted August 8, 2010 Gee, Bob, all that Aristotle studying you did last year and all you really needed to do was watch this silly little video.--Brant1. It was amusing, not silly2. It covered the essentials rather well for the kind of presentation it was.Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 Anyway, I much prefer Archimedes to Aristotle.--Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted August 8, 2010 Author Share Posted August 8, 2010 (edited) Anyway, I much prefer Archimedes to Aristotle.--BrantAs do I. Archimedes is my hero-Hellenist. Archimedes is the greatest known intellect of the classic Greek world. He puts all the others, especially the Athenians in the shadows.Archimedes physics of statics and floating bodies is as good today, as it was when he formulated it nearly 2200 years ago.Ba'al Chatzaf Edited August 8, 2010 by BaalChatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George H. Smith Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 According to this video, recent advances in the science of Quantum Physics have blown Aristotle's Law of Non-Contradiction "to hell." I didn't realize that physicists so readily conceded that some of their theories are self-contradictory. Of course, no one except an expert in physics can possibly understand how foolish it is to believe that a proposition and its contradictory cannot both be true at the same time and in the same respect. Mere laymen are not permitted to entrench upon the sacred domain of scientific mysteries. If a physicist contradicts himself, who are we to insist that he adhere to the standards of intelligibility that mere mortals must observe? Ghs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now