syrakusos Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 To meet the immense volume of demand obligations,which are, by their terms, payable in gold, there existsin actual gold under a modern banking system an amountequal to but a small fraction of the total amount of golddebts. This system is therefore safe only if the creditof the banks is so strong as to inspire a confident reliancethat even if actual gold in large quantity is at one and thesame time demanded from one or from several banks, themetal will not be needlessly and wastefully hoarded, thepublic and the banks themselves being confident thatmoney so withdrawn will be redeposited, so long as thereremain some institutions the credit of which cannot beshaken."Central Bank of the United States" by P. M. WarburgAmerican Economic Association Quarterly, 3rd Series, Vol. 10, No. 1, Papers andDiscussions of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting. Atlantic City, N.J., December 28-31, 1908(Apr., 1909), pp. 338-358Published by: American Economic Association(I'll go ya one better, if ya got the nerve: I'll race ya all the way to ....)The National Government, by the enactment of laws establishingthe national banking system, and by the adoption of Governmentcontrol of its machinery, has undertaken to safeguard theinterests of the Government and of the people in this most importantagency for our national development. I think there are veryfew people who now deny that the National Government has thepower to establish a system of this kind and to provide suitablemachinery for its operation."ADDRESS BY HON. NELSON W. ALDRICH,United States Senator from Rhode Island and Chairman National Monetary Commission." From "The Need for Currency Reform" by L. S. Rowe, Nelson W. Aldrich, Theodore E. Burton, A. Piatt Andrew, George E. RobertsAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 37, Supplement (Jan., 1911), pp. 1-32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 I have no issue with floating currency at present. There are very logical and useful reasons for a floating currency. The major issue is really controlling corruption. I further believe that, given the organization of government as a representation of the people living under it, the government can successfully function as the source of credibility and confidence in the currency. Again, the problem is corruption and not the actual theory itself.As a result, the above snippets don't bother me much. Of course, we always need transparency to avoid corruption. For this reason, Bernanke's position against Ron Paul's proposition absolutely reeks of tainted intentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey smith Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I'm in the midst of reading Niall Ferguson's Ascent of Money. So far, very good read, and looks like a book worth reading if you haven't read it yet. He goes into a great deal of historical detail about the whys and wherefores of the system we operate under now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now