emb021 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Immanuel Kant attack ad. Approved by Frederick Nietszche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Campbell Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 Pretty clever. The makers have mastered the rhetoric and presentation of political attack ads.Robert Campbell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfonso Jones Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Now, THAT is funny. A bit of an in-joke.Alfonso Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Grieb Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 (edited) How wonderful! I think it would probably not be done by the candidate but by the Swift Boat Veterans or their equivalent.All that aside it is really enjoyable. Edited December 12, 2007 by Chris Grieb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syrakusos Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 (edited) Immanuel Kant was a real piss antwho was very rarely stable.Heidegger, Heideggerwas a boozy beggarwho could think you under the table.David Humecould outconsumeSchopenauer and Hegeland Wittgenstein was a beery swinewho was just as shlossed as Schlegel.There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach yaabout the bending of a wristSocrates himself was permanentaly pissed.John Stuart MillOf his own free willon a half a pint of shandywas particularly illPlato, they say, could put it way.Hobbes drank whiskey every dayARISTOTLE ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE THE BOTTLELocke was fond of his dramAnd Rene Descartes was a boozy old fart"I drink therefore I am."Yes, Socrates himself was permanently pissed.A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed!http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7208696110833552970Not to be confused withhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4128497748522225531 Edited December 13, 2007 by Michael E. Marotta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiodekadent Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Did not Neitzsche agree with Kant about the Noumena-Phenomena split anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Gomez Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Did not Neitzsche agree with Kant about the Noumena-Phenomena split anyway?Not unless you've read some Neitzsche that I haven't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now